L-PRF Versus Sticky Bone Grafting of the Jumping Gap in AI-assisted Computer-Guided Socket Shield Immediate Implantation
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
2
Brief Summary
the rationale of the current study is to address a focused and clinically relevant gap in socket shield therapy: which biologic modality best supports healing of the shield-implant gap when SST is performed under a standardized, digitally guided workflow. The study will compare three shield-implant gap filling modalities: (i) L-PRF alone (without membrane), (ii) sticky tooth (autogenous dentin graft +i- PRF), and (iii) sticky bone (particulate graft + i- PRF) under AI-assisted, patient-specific guided implant placement based on IOS/CBCT superimposition, with CBCT follow-up at immediate, 3 months, and 6 months. The working hypothesis is that biologically active, cohesive composites (sticky tooth and sticky bone) will provide superior hard- and soft-tissue dimensional stability compared with PRF alone by improving space maintenance and early wound stability in the shield-implant gap . The null hypothesis is that there will be no statistically significant differences between the three modalities in radiographic and digitally assessed clinical outcomes over the 6-month follow-up period .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 23, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 3, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 28, 2027
March 18, 2026
March 1, 2026
1 year
February 19, 2026
March 16, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
marginal bone level
marginal bone level (FMBL) will be recorded as the vertical distance (mm) from the implant shoulder (or implant platform reference) to the most coronal point of the facial bone crest on the midfacial aspect
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Peri-implant vertical bone defect depth
12 months
Study Arms (3)
PRF alone group
ACTIVE COMPARATORImmediately after implant placement, leukocyte-platelet rich fibrin (L-PRF) will be prepared, then gently packed into the implant-shield gap
Sticky tooth group
EXPERIMENTALThe extracted palatal root portion will be cleaned and processed chairside into dentin particles, then mixed with PRF clot to form "sticky tooth" that will be packed into the implant-shield gap
Sticky bone group
EXPERIMENTALxenograft will be mixed with PRF clot to form "sticky bone" that will be packed into the implant-shield gap
Interventions
shield/implant gap will be grafted by sticky tooth graft
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Medically healthy patients according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system; only patients belonging to ASA I and ASA II categories will be included in this study.
- Age \> 18 years.
- Patients presenting with one non-restorable hopeless anterior tooth due to extensive caries, cervical/root fracture, vertical or oblique root fracture, multiple failed endodontic treatments, or root resorption.
- Sufficient apical/palatal bone to obtain primary implant stability.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients belonging to ASA III, ASA IV and ASA V will be excluded.
- Vertical root fracture involving the labial aspect of the root planned to be retained as the facial shield.
- Horizontal root fracture that is too far apically located.
- Presence of acute (active) periapical infection.
- Large chronic periapical lesion.
- Lack of sufficient bone apical to the extraction socket to obtain primary stability. \* Ankylosed tooth positioned too apically in relation to adjacent teeth.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
faculty of dentistry, kafrelsheikh University
Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh, 214312, Egypt
Walid Elamrousy
Kafr ash Shaykh, 76130, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- outcome assessor is masked
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of periodontology, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2026
First Posted
February 25, 2026
Study Start
February 23, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 3, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 28, 2027
Last Updated
March 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will not be shared