NCT04774523

Brief Summary

BIO\|Adapt study is designed to provide evidence for the clinical benefit of the CRT AutoAdapt feature. This feature provides continuous adaptation of AV delay and biventricular pacing modality. However, additional clinical data on the short and mid-term improvement of CRT-D patients by the CRT AutoAdapt feature are needed.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
198

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable heart-failure

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable heart-failure

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 19, 2021

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 1, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 31, 2021

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 18, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

February 19, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 17, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

CRT therapyHeart FailureAV optimizationLeft Ventricular Ejection FractionAutoAdapt algorithm

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • CRT-responder rate based on improvement in Clinical Composite Score developed by Packer at 12 month follow up.

    It will be use Packer Score to assess the clinical outcome in heart failure patients. It takes into account all possible dimensions of outcome, i.e. mortality, morbidity and quality of life and is based on the following data points: * Death (yes/no) * Any unplanned hospitalization for worsening heart failure (yes/no) * Change in NYHA class compared to baseline (improved/unchanged/worsened) * Patient's global assessment (PGA) compared to baseline (improved - three stages / unchanged / worsened - three stages) * Discontinuation of study protocol due to worsening heart failure, treatment failure or lacking therapeutic response (yes/no) At the end of the study, the outcome of each patient is classified as: * Worsened * Unchanged * Improved

    12 month Follow Up

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Acute hemodynamic effect of AutoAdapt feature

    At pre-hospital discharge assessed up to 30 days since the implantation

  • Change in LVEF

    12 month Follow Up

  • Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic and Systolic Diameter (LVED(S)D)

    12 month Follow Up

  • Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic and Systolic Volumes (LVED(S)V)

    12 month Follow Up

  • Change in NYHA class

    12 month Follow Up

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group will be made up of patients implanted with CRT-D devices without the CRT AutoAdapt feature, or with the CRT AutoAdapt feature deactivated.

Procedure: Echocardiography AV optimizationProcedure: EchocardiographyOther: Self Assessment Score

AutoAdapt group

EXPERIMENTAL

This group will be made up of patients implanted with CRT-D devices that have the CRT AutoAdapt feature available. It is mandatory that all patients within this group have the feature activated, independently of other characteristics.

Procedure: Echo-based assessment of the acute hemodynamic effect of the CRT AutoAdapt feature.Procedure: EchocardiographyOther: Self Assessment Score

Interventions

Patients in the AutoAdapt group undergo the echo-based assessment of the acute hemodynamic effect of the CRT AutoAdapt feature. Three steps must be followed: 1. Standard AV programming: perform echo for AoVTI assessment. 2. Echo-optimized AV programming: perform standard echo-based AV-optimization (Ritter method or iterative method, according to routine at investigational site); measure AoVTI at optimized setting. 3. AutoAdapt optimized programming: The system allows different programming options for the parameter 'Adaptive AV reduction'. The nominal value is 0.7, but it can be modified to different values ranging from 0.5 to 0.9. The AoVTI shall be measured at standard setting of the "Adaptive Av reduction" parameter, 0.7.

AutoAdapt group

Patient in the control group undergo the routine echo-based AV-optimization that is usually performed at the investigational site (Ritter method or iterative method). Performance of an additional VV-delay optimization is left to the investigator discretion

Control group

Echocardiography must be performed at baseline and 12 month Follow Up to collect the LVEF/LVESD(V)/LVEDD(V)

AutoAdapt groupControl group

Patient must complete the self assessment score at 6 and 12 month Follow Up, that will be use for the Packer Clinical Composite Score

AutoAdapt groupControl group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Indication for de novo implantation or upgrade to a CRT-D device
  • Enrolled in BIO\|STREAM.HF but not yet implanted with or upgraded to CRT-D
  • LVEF \< 35%
  • QRS \> 120 ms
  • NYHA II-IV
  • Atrial heart rate during sinus rhythm at rest below 100 bpm
  • Patient is able to understand the nature of the study and willing to provide written informed consent to this submodule

You may not qualify if:

  • Planned implantation or previous implantation with a BIOTRONIK DX ICD lead
  • History of persistent/permanent AF
  • History of complete AV-block

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dr Francisco Javier Garcia

Burgos, Castille and León, 09006, Spain

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart FailureArrhythmias, CardiacVentricular Dysfunction, Left

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsVentricular Dysfunction

Study Officials

  • Francisco Javier García Fernandez, Physician

    Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Spain

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: There will be two arms with the same study flow chart along the study.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2021

First Posted

March 1, 2021

Study Start

August 31, 2021

Primary Completion

July 31, 2024

Study Completion

July 31, 2025

Last Updated

September 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Locations