Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy for Adults: A Prognostic Model for Success
NordicETV
1 other identifier
observational
1,000
4 countries
19
Brief Summary
Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy for Adults with Hydrocephalus: Creating a Prognostic Model for Success - A Retrospective Multicenter Study Background: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is becoming an increasingly widespread treatment for hydrocephalus, but most of the research is based on paediatric populations. The ETV Success Score (ETVSS) was developed in 2009 to predict the outcome of ETV in children. There is no similar tool for predicting outcome in adults. Objective: The purpose of this study is to create a prognostic model to predict the success of ETV for adult patients with hydrocephalus Methods: The study will adhere to the TRIPOD reporting guidelines and will be conducted as a retrospective chart review of all patients ≥18 years old treated with ETV at the participating centres between Jan 1st, 2010 and Dec 31st, 2018. Data collection is conducted locally in REDCap. Univariate analyses will be used to identify several strong predictors to be included in a multivariate logistic regression model. The model will be validated using K-fold cross validation. Discrimination will be assesses using AUROC and calibration with calibration belt plots. Expected outcomes: The ability to predict who will benefit from an ETV will allow better primary patient selection both for ETV and shunting. This would reduce additional second procedures due to primary treatment failure. A success score specific for adults could also be used as a communication tool to provide better information and guidance to patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2020
Typical duration for all trials
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2022
CompletedMay 3, 2022
May 1, 2022
2 years
February 22, 2021
May 1, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
ETV success
The procedure is considered successful if the patient experience clinical improvement at first follow up and receives no further CSF diversion procedures, within one year of the initial procedure.
Evaluated 1 year after operation
Secondary Outcomes (2)
ETV survival
From procedure to latest documented follow-up, adressed up to 31 dec. 2020.
ETV related adverse events
Up to 3 months after operation.
Eligibility Criteria
The study population is all first time ETV performed at the participating centres between January 1st 2010 and December 31st 2018.
You may qualify if:
- ETV procedure performed
- ≥18 years old at time of first ETV
You may not qualify if:
- \<18 years old at time of first ETV
- Permanent intraventricular foreign bodies left behind after the ETV. eg. Shunt or stents. Temporary external ventricular drains, ICP-monitoring probes or ligated shunts where the ventricular drain is removed, are not excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (19)
Department of Neurosurgery, Aalborg University Hospital
Aalborg, Denmark
Department of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Denmark
Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital
Odense, Denmark
Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki
Helsinki, Finland
Department of Neurosurgery NeuroCenter Kuopio University Hospital
Kuopio, Finland
Department of Neurosurgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland & Research Unit of Clinical Neuroscience, Oulu University
Oulu, Finland
Neurocenter, Department of Neurosurgery and Turku Brain Injury Center, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku
Turku, Finland
Department of Neurosurgery, Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, Norway
Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet
Oslo, Norway
Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål
Oslo, Norway
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of North Norway
Tromsø, Norway
Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs University Hospital
Trondheim, Norway
Department of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg, Sweden
Department of Neurosurgery in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University
Linköping, Sweden
Department of Neurosurgery, Lund University Hospital
Lund, Sweden
Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, Sweden
Department of Neurosurgery, Umeå University Hospital
Umeå, Sweden
Department of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University Hospital
Uppsala, Sweden
Related Publications (29)
Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Mallucci CL, Sgouros S, Roth J, Constantini S; Canadian Pediatric Neurosurgery Study Group. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus. J Pediatr. 2009 Aug;155(2):254-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.02.048. Epub 2009 May 15.
PMID: 19446842BACKGROUNDReddy GK, Bollam P, Caldito G, Willis B, Guthikonda B, Nanda A. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications in hydrocephalus patients with intracranial tumors: an analysis of relevant risk factors. J Neurooncol. 2011 Jun;103(2):333-42. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0393-4. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
PMID: 20842407BACKGROUNDMerkler AE, Ch'ang J, Parker WE, Murthy SB, Kamel H. The Rate of Complications after Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Surgery. World Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;98:654-658. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.136. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
PMID: 27826086BACKGROUNDReddy GK, Bollam P, Shi R, Guthikonda B, Nanda A. Management of adult hydrocephalus with ventriculoperitoneal shunts: long-term single-institution experience. Neurosurgery. 2011 Oct;69(4):774-80; discussion 780-1. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821ffa9e.
PMID: 21508873BACKGROUNDGrand W, Leonardo J, Chamczuk AJ, Korus AJ. Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in 250 Adults With Hydrocephalus: Patient Selection, Outcomes, and Complications. Neurosurgery. 2016 Jan;78(1):109-19. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000994.
PMID: 26295500BACKGROUNDBouras T, Sgouros S. Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 Jun;7(6):643-9. doi: 10.3171/2011.4.PEDS10503.
PMID: 21631203BACKGROUNDDusick JR, McArthur DL, Bergsneider M. Success and complication rates of endoscopic third ventriculostomy for adult hydrocephalus: a series of 108 patients. Surg Neurol. 2008 Jan;69(1):5-15. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.08.024.
PMID: 18054606BACKGROUNDLabidi M, Lavoie P, Lapointe G, Obaid S, Weil AG, Bojanowski MW, Turmel A. Predicting success of endoscopic third ventriculostomy: validation of the ETV Success Score in a mixed population of adult and pediatric patients. J Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;123(6):1447-55. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS141240. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
PMID: 26207604BACKGROUNDFoley RW, Ndoro S, Crimmins D, Caird J. Is the endoscopic third ventriculostomy success score an appropriate tool to inform clinical decision-making? Br J Neurosurg. 2017 Jun;31(3):314-319. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2016.1229744. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
PMID: 27624099BACKGROUNDBreimer GE, Sival DA, Brusse-Keizer MG, Hoving EW. An external validation of the ETVSS for both short-term and long-term predictive adequacy in 104 pediatric patients. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013 Aug;29(8):1305-11. doi: 10.1007/s00381-013-2122-8. Epub 2013 May 5.
PMID: 23644629BACKGROUNDDurnford AJ, Kirkham FJ, Mathad N, Sparrow OC. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus: validation of a success score that predicts long-term outcome. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 Nov;8(5):489-93. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.PEDS1166.
PMID: 22044375BACKGROUNDWaqar M, Ellenbogen JR, Stovell MG, Al-Mahfoudh R, Mallucci C, Jenkinson MD. Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in Adults. World Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;94:386-393. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.07.028. Epub 2016 Jul 17.
PMID: 27436208BACKGROUNDDlouhy BJ, Capuano AW, Madhavan K, Torner JC, Greenlee JD. Preoperative third ventricular bowing as a predictor of endoscopic third ventriculostomy success. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012 Feb;9(2):182-90. doi: 10.3171/2011.11.PEDS11495.
PMID: 22295925BACKGROUNDKehler U, Regelsberger J, Gliemroth J, Westphal M. Outcome prediction of third ventriculostomy: a proposed hydrocephalus grading system. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2006 Aug;49(4):238-43. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-950382.
PMID: 17041837BACKGROUNDIsaacs AM, Bezchlibnyk YB, Yong H, Koshy D, Urbaneja G, Hader WJ, Hamilton MG. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for treatment of adult hydrocephalus: long-term follow-up of 163 patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Sep;41(3):E3. doi: 10.3171/2016.6.FOCUS16193.
PMID: 27581315BACKGROUNDHong S, Hirokawa D, Usami K, Ogiwara H. The long-term outcomes of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in pediatric hydrocephalus, with an emphasis on future intellectual development and shunt dependency. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019 Jan 1;23(1):104-108. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.PEDS18220. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
PMID: 30497212BACKGROUNDDewan MC, Lim J, Shannon CN, Wellons JC 3rd. The durability of endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculoperitoneal shunts in children with hydrocephalus following posterior fossa tumor resection: a systematic review and time-to-failure analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 May;19(5):578-584. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.PEDS16536. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
PMID: 28291428BACKGROUNDStovell MG, Zakaria R, Ellenbogen JR, Gallagher MJ, Jenkinson MD, Hayhurst C, Mallucci CL. Long-term follow-up of endoscopic third ventriculostomy performed in the pediatric population. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Jun;17(6):734-8. doi: 10.3171/2015.11.PEDS15212. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
PMID: 26870897BACKGROUNDFaggin R, Calderone M, Denaro L, Meneghini L, d'Avella D. Long-term operative failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in pediatric patients: the role of cine phase-contrast MR imaging. Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Apr;30(4):E1. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.FOCUS10303.
PMID: 21456920BACKGROUNDBeuriat PA, Puget S, Cinalli G, Blauwblomme T, Beccaria K, Zerah M, Sainte-Rose C. Hydrocephalus treatment in children: long-term outcome in 975 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Jul;20(1):10-18. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.PEDS16491. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
PMID: 28430083BACKGROUNDSacko O, Boetto S, Lauwers-Cances V, Dupuy M, Roux FE. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: outcome analysis in 368 procedures. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010 Jan;5(1):68-74. doi: 10.3171/2009.8.PEDS08108.
PMID: 20043738BACKGROUNDKadrian D, van Gelder J, Florida D, Jones R, Vonau M, Teo C, Stening W, Kwok B. Long-term reliability of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery. 2005 Jun;56(6):1271-8; discussion 1278. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000159712.48093.ad.
PMID: 15918943BACKGROUNDGangemi M, Mascari C, Maiuri F, Godano U, Donati P, Longatti PL. Long-term outcome of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in obstructive hydrocephalus. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2007 Oct;50(5):265-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-990305.
PMID: 18058641BACKGROUNDVulcu S, Eickele L, Cinalli G, Wagner W, Oertel J. Long-term results of endoscopic third ventriculostomy: an outcome analysis. J Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;123(6):1456-62. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.JNS14414. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
PMID: 26230473BACKGROUNDVogel TW, Bahuleyan B, Robinson S, Cohen AR. The role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013 Jul;12(1):54-61. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.PEDS12481. Epub 2013 May 17.
PMID: 23682819BACKGROUNDRahme R, Rahme RJ, Hourani R, Moussa R, Nohra G, Okais N, Samaha E, Rizk T. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: the Lebanese experience. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2009;45(5):361-7. doi: 10.1159/000257525. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
PMID: 19907200BACKGROUNDGliemroth J, Kasbeck E, Kehler U. Ventriculocisternostomy versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt in the treatment of hydrocephalus: a retrospective, long-term observational study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Jul;122:92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
PMID: 24908225BACKGROUNDWoodworth GF, See A, Bettegowda C, Batra S, Jallo GI, Rigamonti D. Predictors of surgery-free outcome in adult endoscopic third ventriculostomy. World Neurosurg. 2012 Sep-Oct;78(3-4):312-7. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.09.018. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
PMID: 22120264BACKGROUNDTefre S, Lilja-Cyron A, Arvidsson L, Bartek J, Corell A, Forsse A, Glud AN, Hamdeh SA, Hansen FL, Huotarinen A, Johansson C, Kamarainen OP, Korhonen T, Kotkansalo A, Mansoor NM, Mendoza Mireles EE, Miscov R, Munthe S, Nittby-Redebrandt H, Obad N, Pedersen LK, Posti J, Raj R, Satopaa J, Stahl N, Tetri S, Tobieson L, Juhler M. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for adults with hydrocephalus: creating a prognostic model for success: protocol for a retrospective multicentre study (Nordic ETV). BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):e055570. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055570.
PMID: 35105647DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sondre Tefre
Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Marianne Juhler
Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2021
First Posted
February 26, 2021
Study Start
May 27, 2020
Primary Completion
June 1, 2022
Study Completion
August 1, 2022
Last Updated
May 3, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
The study is conducted as part of the Nordic Young Neurosurgeons Research Collaborative (NYNReC). Data is available upon reasonable request. Interested parties must apply in writing through nynrec.org including plan for analysis and dissemination of findings. Application will be evaluated by the NYNReC Committee and study lead. A request for access may be declined if the proposal lacks clarity or a satisfactory methodology.