Berzosertib + Topotecan in Relapsed Platinum-Resistant Small-Cell Lung Cancer (DDRiver SCLC 250)
A Phase II, Open-label, Single-arm Study of Berzosertib (M6620) in Combination With Topotecan in Participants With Relapsed Platinum-resistant Small-Cell Lung Cancer (DDRiver SCLC 250)
2 other identifiers
interventional
76
7 countries
51
Brief Summary
The main purpose of this study is to assess efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Berzosertib in combination with Topotecan in participants with relapsed, platinum-resistant small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study will be conducted in two parts: safety run-in part and main part. The safety run-in part will be conducted in Japan.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Mar 2021
51 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 29, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 21, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 21, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 26, 2024
CompletedSeptember 26, 2024
August 1, 2024
2.3 years
February 19, 2021
July 17, 2024
September 3, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Main Part: Objective Response Rate According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Objective response rate was defined as percentage of participants with either a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) from first administration of study treatment to first observation of progressive disease (PD). CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR: At least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of their diameters, and no unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or appearance of any new lesion.
Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
DLT is defined as drug-related: Neutropenia Grade 4 for greater than (\>) 7 days' duration; Febrile neutropenia (that is \[i.e.\] absolute neutrophil count less than (\< ) 1000 per millimeter cube (mm\^3) with single temperature of \> 38.3°degree Celsius or a sustained temperature of greater than or equal to (\>=) 38 degree Celsius for more than 1 hour; Infection (documented clinically or microbiologically) with Grades 3 or 4 neutropenia; Thrombocytopenia \>= Grade 3; Grade \>= 3 non-hematological AEs.
Up to Cycle 1 Day 21 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether considered related to the study intervention or not. A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs were defined as events with onset date or worsening during the on-treatment period. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs. Treatment-related TEAEs is defined as reasonably related to the study intervention.
Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs
Vital signs included body temperature, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and respiration rate. Number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs were reported. Clinical significance was decided by Investigator.
Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
ECG parameters included PR interval, RR interval, QT interval, QRS duration, QTc intervals (derived using Fridericia's correction method) and heart rate. A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position after a rest of at least 5 minutes using an ECG machine. Clinical significance was decided by investigator. Number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in 12-Lead ECGs were reported.
Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
The laboratory measurements included hematology and biochemistry. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities with Grade greater than or equals to (\>=) 3 in laboratory values reported as TEAEs as per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v5.0 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe; Grade 4: Life-threatening; Grade 5: Death. Clinically Significance was decided by investigator.
Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Secondary Outcomes (35)
Main Part: Duration of Response (DoR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
From first documented objective response to PD or death due to any cause, assessed up to 27.7 months
Main Part: Progression-free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Time from first administration of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, assessed up to 27.7 months
Main Part: Overall Survival (OS)
Time from first administration of study treatment to the date of death, assessed up to 27.7 months
Main Part: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Measured by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1), end of treatment (up to 62 weeks). Each cycle is of 21 days
Main Part: Number of Participants Who Improved, Worsened or Remained Stable in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life and Lung Cancer Specific Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-LC13)
Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1), end of treatment (up to 62 weeks). Each cycle is of 21 days
- +30 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Safety run-in Part (Dose Level1 [DL 1]): Berzosertib 105 mg/m^2 + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m^2
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received Berzosertib at a dose of 105 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2 ) intravenously on Day 2 and Day 5 of each 21-daycycle in combination with Topotecan at a dose of 1.25mg/m\^2 intravenously on Days1 through 5 of each 21-day cycle in DL1 of safety run-in part until disease progression or other criteria for study intervention discontinuation are met.
Safety run-in Part (DL2) +Main Part: Berzosertib 210 mg/m^2 + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m^2
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received Berzosertib at a dose of 210 mg/m\^2 intravenously on Day 2 and Day 5 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Topotecan at a dose of 1.25 mg/m\^2 intravenously on Days 1 through 5 of each 21-day cycle in DL 1 and DL 2 of safety run-in part and main part until disease progression or other criteria for study intervention discontinuation are met.
Interventions
Participants received Berzosertib at a dose of 105 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2 ) intravenously on Day 2 and Day 5 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression or other criteria for study intervention discontinuation are met.
Participants received Topotecan at a dose of 1.25 mg/m\^2 intravenously on Days 1 through 5 of each 21-day cycle in DL1 and DL2 of safety run-in part and main part until disease progression or other criteria for study intervention discontinuation are met.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Dose level 1 participants with histologically proven advanced solid tumors, for which no effective standard therapy exists, or standard therapy has failed or cannot be tolerated
- Dose level 1 participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) less than or equal to (\<=) 1 and Karnofsky Scale greater than or equal to (\>=) 70 percent (%)
- Dose level 2 and main part participants with ECOG PS \<= 2 and Karnofsky Scale \>= 60%
- Dose level 2 and main part participants with histologically confirmed SCLC
- Dose level 2 and main part participants with radiologically confirmed progression after first-line or chemoradiation platinum-based treatment (carboplatin or cisplatin), with or without immunotherapy, for treatment of limited or extensive stage SCLC, with a Platinum-free interval (PFI) less than (\<) 90 days. The PFI is measured by the elapsed time from the last day of the regimen of a platinum-based treatment until the first day of documented disease progression
- Dose level 2 and main part participants with measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (RECISTv1.1) at Screening. Evidence of measurable disease must be confirmed by the IRC prior to start of treatment
- Tumor tissue provision: archival (collected within 12 months before date of informed consent form \[ICF\]) signature for Screening) or fresh biopsy specimen, if medically feasible
- Have adequate hematologic and renal function
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically relevant (that is \[i.e.\], active), uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, severe active infection including, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection/coronavirus disease 2019, immune deficiencies, uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, symptomatic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Classification greater than or equal to \[\>=\] Class III), unstable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, cerebral vascular accident/stroke. Calculated corrected QT interval (QTc) average (using the Fridericia correction calculation) of greater than \[\>\] 450 millisecond (msec) for males and \> 470 msec for females. Any psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
- Unstable brain metastases; however, participants with known brain metastases may be enrolled in this clinical study if they are clinically stable (without evidence of progression by imaging for at least 2 weeks prior to the first study intervention dose and any neurologic symptoms have returned to baseline), have no evidence of new brain metastases, and are on a stable or decreasing dose of steroids for at least 14 days prior to study intervention Participants with carcinomatous meningitis are excluded regardless of clinical stability. Screening central nervous system imaging is not mandatory
- Prior malignant disease within the last 3 years. Exceptions include fully resected basal cell carcinoma of the skin or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, in situ cervical cancer, fully resected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, superficial or noninvasive bladder cancer, and Stage IA, Grade I endometrioid endometrial cancer with no myometrial invasion, that has undergone curative therapy. Participants with other localized malignancies treated with curative intent need to be discussed with the Medical Monitor
- Participants not recovered from adverse events (AEs) Grade \> 1 from prior anticancer therapies, including surgeries. Exception: Grade 2 AEs not constituting a safety risk (for example \[e.g.\], alopecia), based on the Investigator's judgment; must consult with the medical Monitor prior to enrollment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (51)
Providence Medical Foundation
Santa Rosa, California, 95403, United States
St Joseph Heritage Healthcare
Santa Rosa, California, 95403, United States
Cotton-O'Neil Clinical Research Center, Hematology and Oncology
Topeka, Kansas, 66606, United States
National Cancer Institute
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Cancer & Hematology Centers of Western Michigan
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49546, United States
MidAmerica Cancer Care
Kansas City, Missouri, 64114, United States
NJ Center for Cancer Research
Brick, New Jersey, 08724, United States
Southeastern Medical Oncology Center
Goldsboro, North Carolina, 27534, United States
FirstHealth of the Carolinas, Inc.
Pinehurst, North Carolina, 28374, United States
Summa Health
Akron, Ohio, 44304, United States
Toledo Clinic
Toledo, Ohio, 43623, United States
Millennium Physicians Association, LLP
Houston, Texas, 77090, United States
Centre Hospitalier de l'Ardenne
Arlon, Belgium
Institut Jules Bordet - Department of Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, Belgium
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, Belgium
AZ Delta
Roeselare, Belgium
CHU UCL Namur - Mont-Godinne
Yvoir, Belgium
Beijing Cancer Hospital
Beijing, China
Jilin Cancer Hospital
Changchun, China
Sichuan Cancer Hospital
Chengdu, China
West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, China
Jiangsu Province Hospital
Nanjing, China
Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute
Shenyang, China
Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Xi'an, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University school of medicine
Zhejiang, China
Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux, France
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil - Service de Pneumologie
Créteil, France
Hopital Albert Calmette - CHU Lille - service de pneumologie et immuno allergologie
Lille, France
CHU Poitiers - Hôpital la Milétrie - service d'oncologie médicale
Poitiers, France
CHU Nantes - Hôpital Guillaume et René Laënnec - Service de Pneumologie
Saint-Herblain, France
CHU de Strasbourg - Nouvel Hôpital Civil - Service de Pneumologie
Strasbourg, France
IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo Per Lo Studio e La Cura Dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" - IRST
Meldola, Italy
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Niguarda (Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda)
Milan, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana (Presidio di Cisanello)
Pisa, 56124, Italy
Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena IRCCS
Roma, 00144, Italy
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS - UOC Oncologia Medica
Rome, Italy
National Cancer Center Hospital
Chūōku, Japan
Kansai Medical University Hospital
Hirakata-shi, Japan
National Cancer Center Hospital East
Kashiwa-shi, Japan
Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR
Kōtoku, Japan
Kindai University Hospital
Osaka, Japan
Kurume University Hospital
Osaka, Japan
Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital
Takatsuki-shi, Japan
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, Spain
Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria - Oncology Service
Málaga, Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
Málaga, Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
Seville, Spain
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Communication Center
- Organization
- Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Responsible
Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2021
First Posted
February 24, 2021
Study Start
March 29, 2021
Primary Completion
July 21, 2023
Study Completion
July 21, 2023
Last Updated
September 26, 2024
Results First Posted
September 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Within six months after the approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the United States and the European Union
- Access Criteria
- Qualified scientific and medical researchers can request the data. Such requests must be submitted in writing to the company's portal and will be internally reviewed regarding criteria for researchers' qualification and legitimacy of the research proposal.
We are committed to enhancing public health through responsible sharing of clinical trial data. Following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the US and European Union, the study sponsor and/or its affiliated companies will share study protocols, anonymized patient data and study level data, and redacted clinical study reports with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website bit.ly/IPD21