Intravenous Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine on the Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients having lumbar spinal fusion often complain about severe postoperative pain and postoperative rehabilitation process can be affected negatively. Postoperative pain that cannot be well controlled may lead to delayed mobilization, pulmonary and thromboembolic complications, prolonged hospital stays, and chronic pain syndromes. Pain after spinal surgery can arise from several different tissues, such as the vertebrae, disks, ligaments, dura, facet joint, muscle, fascia, and subcutaneous and cutaneous tissues. Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been shown to reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). However, the duration of analgesia after single-shot ESPB with commonly used local anesthetics is reported to be no more than 12 h, which often not long enough to provide satisfactory postoperative pain relief, as the pain typically lasts for several days. Compared with perineural route, intravenous additives to local anesthetics are commonly accepted as its safety and efficiency have been reported. Moreover, co-administration of intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine significantly prolonged the time to first rescue analgesic request after single-shot interscalene brachial plexus block. However, more data are needed especially for lumbar ESPB.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2021
CompletedMarch 29, 2022
March 1, 2022
6 months
February 19, 2021
March 26, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The cumulative opioid consumption
At 24 postoperative hours
The time to first rescue analgesic request
Up to 48 postoperative hrs
Secondary Outcomes (4)
The pain scores determined by the numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10)
At 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48 hrs after the surgery
Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting
Up to 24 postoperative hrs
Postoperative hospital length of stay
Up to 3 weeks
Adverse events
Up to 48 postoperative hrs
Study Arms (2)
DD group
EXPERIMENTALco-administered intravenous dexamethasone 10 mg and dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg
D group
PLACEBO COMPARATORintravenous dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg
Interventions
General anesthesia was induced with sufentanil 0.5-0.8 ug/kg, propofol 1.5-2.0 mg/kg, and rocuronium 0.5-1.0 mg/kg. Intravenous dexamethasone 10 mg was injected and a 50-ml syringe containing dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg in 0.9% saline was infused after induction of general anaesthesia over a 30-min period. Anesthesia was maintained by remifentanil and sevoflurane to keep the Narcotrend index reading between 40 and 60.
Intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg was infused after induction of general anaesthesia over a 30-min period.
The probe was installed in the sagittal axis in the midline at the L3 vertebral level. The spinous processes were first visualized, after which the probe was lateralized, and the transverse processes and the erector spinae muscle were visualized approximately 3 cm laterally to the midline. The needle was advanced between the transverse process and the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle from the caudal to the cranial using in-plane technique. The location of the needle was confirmed with 2mL saline solution, after which 20 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine was administered.
Intravenous PCA included 0.9% saline with sufentanil and was programmed to run at 2ml with a 1-ml bolus dose and a 10-min lockout time. The patients with VAS more than 4 despite using intravenous PCA were treated with rescue analgesics comprising intravenous parecoxib.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-65 yrs
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical statusⅠ-Ⅲ
- Involvement of ≤3 spinal levels
- Undergo elective posterior lumbar interbody fusion
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- A known allergy to the drugs being used
- Pre-existing neuropsychiatric disorders or language barrier
- Analgesics intake, history of substance abuse
- Contraindications to peripheral nerve block
- Acute cerebrovascular disease
- Severe liver failure
- Uncontrolled low blood pressure
- Sinus bradycardia or atrioventricular block
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Union Hospital
Wuhan, Hubei, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2021
First Posted
February 23, 2021
Study Start
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion
August 22, 2021
Study Completion
December 30, 2021
Last Updated
March 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share