Pain, Learning, and Nocebo
PIPLE
Manipulating NMDA-dependent Learning to Alter Nocebo Effects: A Pharmacological fMRI Study on Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
53
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Nocebo effects, negative responses to inert or active treatments which are putatively induced by negative outcome expectations, have been shown to play a significant role in pain perception. The underlying neurobiological mechanisms of these effects remain largely unexplored. The primary objective of this study is to test the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-dependent learning in an experimental model of conditioned nocebo effects on self-reported pain. Secondary objectives are to examine the role of the NMDA manipulation and related neural correlates during the acquisition and extinction of nocebo effects using statistical learning models. This study will utilize a placebo controlled, double-blind design with respect to the pharmacological administration of 80 mg D-Cycloserine (DCS), an NMDA agonist, or placebo. Validated conditioning and verbal suggestion (VS) paradigms will induce nocebo effects on pain in a random sample of 50 healthy adults. The primary endpoint of the study is the magnitude of the induced nocebo effect on pain measured as the difference between self-reported pain, between the first conditioned and control extinction trials. Secondary endpoints include the classification analysis of the Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) responses of participants into pharmacological groups with multivariate pattern analysis. This study will be conducted at Leiden University and the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), The Netherlands.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started Feb 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable chronic-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 28, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 20, 2021
CompletedJanuary 11, 2022
January 1, 2022
6 months
December 13, 2020
January 10, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Magnitude of induced nocebo hyperalgesia
is defined as the difference in pain numerical rating scale ratings (self-report, scale from 0 - no pain to 10 - worst pain imaginable) for the first nocebo trial compared to the first control trial of the extinction phase. A significant difference here is assessed within the mixed model ANOVA, comparing within-subjects differences for the control and nocebo trials between DCS and placebo groups
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
The difference in blood-oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response at a series of a priori ROIs between pharmacological groups during the acquisition of nocebo effects.
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
The classification accuracy (into pharmacological groups), indicating that patterns of activation in the network of a priori ROIs form a model that can detect differences in neural activations during the acquisition of nocebo effects.
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
The difference in BOLD response at a series of a priori ROIs between pharmacological groups during the extinction of nocebo effects.
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
The classification accuracy (into pharmacological groups), indicating that patterns of BOLD activation in the network of a priori ROIs form a model that can detect differences in neural activations during the first trials of the extinction phase.
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
The difference in BOLD response at a series of a priori ROIs between pain at baseline and nocebo-augmented pain.
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Augmented learning
EXPERIMENTALConditioning and extinction of a nocebo response to the activation of a sham electrode, controlled within subjects. All participants in this arm receive a double-blind oral dose of DCS two hours prior to conditioning and fMRI
Baseline learning
PLACEBO COMPARATORConditioning and extinction of a nocebo response to the activation of a sham electrode, controlled within subjects. All participants in this arm receive a double-blind oral dose of placebo two hours prior to conditioning and fMRI
Interventions
Antibiotic medication that augments the function of NMDA-receptors
During nocebo acquisition trials, the conditioned stimulus (i.e., activation of a sham electrode that can increase pain sensitivity, is paired to unconditioned high-pain stimuli (nocebo trials). During control trials of the acquisition phase, moderate-pain stimuli are paired to no sham electrode activation.
During nocebo extinction, moderate pain stimulations are administered both after the administration of the conditioned stimulus (i.e., activation of the sham electrode) and the control stimulus (no activation of the sham electrode), in order to evoke nocebo responses to the sham hyperalgesic procedure.
In both arms of the study, BOLD response data will be collected with fMRI during the acquisition and extinction of nocebo effects on pain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 - 35 years
- Good understanding of the English language
- Normal or corrected to normal vision
You may not qualify if:
- History of serious or chronic medical or psychiatric conditions (e.g., convulsions (epilepsy), cardiovascular problems, depression; careful and detailed screening will be carried out for both medical and psychiatric conditions)
- History of chronic pain or itch conditions
- Experiencing pain or itch of 1 or more on a 0-10 pain / itch NRS on the day of testing
- Currently using antihistamines, analgesic medication, or itch-reducing medication (in the 24 hours prior to testing)
- Use of psychotropic drugs (including recreational drugs such as cannabis and psychotropic prescription-medication; in the past month)
- Currently being (or intending to become) pregnant, or currently breastfeeding, or planning to father a child in the next 3 months
- Colour-blindness
- Body Mass Index under 16 or over 30
- Having too high of a threshold for pain (where high pain cannot be induced with temperatures lower than 49.5 °C).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Leiden University Medical Centerlead
- Leiden Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Leiden University
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 AK, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrea WM Evers, PhD
Leiden University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2020
First Posted
February 21, 2021
Study Start
February 28, 2021
Primary Completion
August 20, 2021
Study Completion
August 20, 2021
Last Updated
January 11, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will become available immediately after publication of the study and will be retained for 15 years.
- Access Criteria
- Anonymized data can be shared with scientists in relevant fields for the purpose of future studies such as replication or meta-analysis (or with designated persons for monitoring purposes).
All data are collected pseudonymised thus no personal data are stored or shared. Consent forms are the only sources containing personal data and will not be shared, but are monitored by the department's Data Monitor. Supporting Information: Study Protocol; Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP); Analytic Code