Electrophysiological Correlates of Nocebo Effects on Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain is a nociceptive somatosensory process that can arise as a debilitating and chronic symptom in various diseases or following an injury. How pain is experienced can vary widely within and across individuals, and can be shaped by cognitive processes such as learning. Nocebo effects, negative changes in symptom severity attributed to learned outcome-expectations, demonstrate how learning processes can be detrimental for the experience of pain. Research to date has produced inconclusive findings regarding the electrophysiological correlates on nocebo effects. The few studies that have applied electroencephalography (EEG) in this field have pointed towards a potential involvement of alpha-band activity, but the direction of this involvement remains unclear. For example, an EEG study of conditioned nocebo hyperalgesia found a pre to post increase in resting state alpha band power that was correlated with pain catastrophizing scores and not with the magnitude of the nocebo effect. Later, other studies also found pre to post changes in alpha band power, however, these changes were correlated with the magnitude of nocebo effects and not pain catastrophizing. Given the discrepancy in findings, in this study the investigators plan to primarily investigate whether EEG components predict the magnitude of nocebo responses to thermal-pain stimuli. The investigators will also explore electrophysiological correlates during pain anticipation and whether nocebo responses would be significantly related to spectral and temporal EEG biomarkers. This study will utilize a validated model of instructional and associative learning methods (i.e., negative suggestions and classical conditioning, respectively) to experimentally induce nocebo effects on heat-evoked pain. Developing objective, brain-derived markers for nocebo responses, or the detection of individuals most susceptible to nocebo hyperalgesia, will aid in the comprehensive management of pain. This study is conducted at Leiden University.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 21, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 7, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 7, 2020
CompletedJanuary 9, 2020
January 1, 2020
3 months
December 9, 2019
January 7, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Magnitude of induced nocebo hyperalgesia
The magnitude of induced nocebo hyperalgesia is defined as the difference in pain ratings for the first nocebo trial compared to the first control trial of the nocebo block evocation phase. A significant difference here is assessed within the mixed model ANOVA. Then, calculated difference scores represent the magnitude of induced effects and will be used in further analyses of EEG data.
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Magnitude of nocebo responses during evocation
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Nocebo-augmented pain
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Other Outcomes (4)
Electroencephalography components (EEG power in alpha band)
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Electroencephalography components (EEG power in beta band)
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Electroencephalography components (EEG power in gamma band)
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Nocebo induction
EXPERIMENTALConditioning and evocation of a nocebo response to a sham (inert) medication contained in a blue or a brown jar, controlled within subjects.
Interventions
During baseline pain stimulations, a comparison block will include 6 high- and 2 moderate-pain stimulations.
During nocebo induction trials, the conditioned stimulus (i.e., a sham medical gel that can increase pain sensitivity, named "TDA" and contained in either a brown or a blue jar) is paired to unconditioned high-pain stimuli (nocebo trials). Lower 'baseline' pain is paired with no gel application (control trials).
During nocebo evocation, lower pain stimulations are administered both after the administration of the conditioned stimulus (i.e., a sham medical gel "TDA") and the control stimulus (no medical gel), in order to evoke nocebo responses to the sham hyperalgesic medication.
In the single group of participants, EEG recordings will be conducted during baseline, during a first resting-state of 5-minutes, during induction/evocation of nocebo responses, and during a second resting-state of 5-minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 - 35 years
- Good understanding of the English language
- Normal or corrected to normal vision
You may not qualify if:
- Ever having experienced serious medical or psychiatric conditions (e.g., heart or lung disease, panic attacks, drug addiction, clinical depression),
- Ever having experienced chronic pain complaints (pain for more than 6 months),
- Having experienced persisting painful health problems in the last 6 months,
- Experiencing acute physical pain (e.g., headache, or having used pain medication on the day of testing,
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding,
- Having recent injuries to the wrists or arms on the day of testing,
- Previous participation in this or similar studies (e.g., using conditioning or thermal pain).
- Having consumed psychotropic medication, recreational drugs, analgesic medication, or more than 3 units of alcohol, in the 24 hours prior to the study appointment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Leiden University Medical Centerlead
- Universiteit Leidencollaborator
- VU University of Amsterdamcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Leiden University
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 AK, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrea WM Evers, Prof. Dr.
Leiden University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- A double-blind randomization list was created by an independent researcher to randomize participants into two counterbalanced conditions: participants either receive the nocebo sham medical gel in a blue or in a brown jar. Complete blinding of the researchers during the experiment is not possible due to the nature of conditioning/ suggestion paradigms. Participants are blind with respect to the conditioning/nocebo manipulation.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 9, 2019
First Posted
December 16, 2019
Study Start
October 21, 2019
Primary Completion
January 7, 2020
Study Completion
January 7, 2020
Last Updated
January 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will become available immediately after publication of the study and will be retained for 15 years.
- Access Criteria
- Data can be shared with scientists in relevant fields for the purpose of future studies such as replication or meta-analysis (or with designated persons for monitoring purposes).
All data are collected pseudonymised thus no personal data are stored or shared. Consent forms are the only sources containing personal data and will not be shared, but are monitored by the department's Data Monitor.