NCT04199858

Brief Summary

Pain is a nociceptive somatosensory process that can arise as a debilitating and chronic symptom in various diseases or following an injury. How pain is experienced can vary widely within and across individuals, and can be shaped by cognitive processes such as learning. Nocebo effects, negative changes in symptom severity attributed to learned outcome-expectations, demonstrate how learning processes can be detrimental for the experience of pain. Research to date has produced inconclusive findings regarding the electrophysiological correlates on nocebo effects. The few studies that have applied electroencephalography (EEG) in this field have pointed towards a potential involvement of alpha-band activity, but the direction of this involvement remains unclear. For example, an EEG study of conditioned nocebo hyperalgesia found a pre to post increase in resting state alpha band power that was correlated with pain catastrophizing scores and not with the magnitude of the nocebo effect. Later, other studies also found pre to post changes in alpha band power, however, these changes were correlated with the magnitude of nocebo effects and not pain catastrophizing. Given the discrepancy in findings, in this study the investigators plan to primarily investigate whether EEG components predict the magnitude of nocebo responses to thermal-pain stimuli. The investigators will also explore electrophysiological correlates during pain anticipation and whether nocebo responses would be significantly related to spectral and temporal EEG biomarkers. This study will utilize a validated model of instructional and associative learning methods (i.e., negative suggestions and classical conditioning, respectively) to experimentally induce nocebo effects on heat-evoked pain. Developing objective, brain-derived markers for nocebo responses, or the detection of individuals most susceptible to nocebo hyperalgesia, will aid in the comprehensive management of pain. This study is conducted at Leiden University.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 21, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 9, 2019

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 16, 2019

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 7, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 7, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

January 9, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

December 9, 2019

Last Update Submit

January 7, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

PainNoceboHyperalgesiaElectroencephalographyEEGConditioningLearningNegative suggestions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Magnitude of induced nocebo hyperalgesia

    The magnitude of induced nocebo hyperalgesia is defined as the difference in pain ratings for the first nocebo trial compared to the first control trial of the nocebo block evocation phase. A significant difference here is assessed within the mixed model ANOVA. Then, calculated difference scores represent the magnitude of induced effects and will be used in further analyses of EEG data.

    Through study completion, an average of 3 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Magnitude of nocebo responses during evocation

    Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  • Nocebo-augmented pain

    Through study completion, an average of 3 months

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Electroencephalography components (EEG power in alpha band)

    Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  • Electroencephalography components (EEG power in beta band)

    Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  • Electroencephalography components (EEG power in gamma band)

    Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Nocebo induction

EXPERIMENTAL

Conditioning and evocation of a nocebo response to a sham (inert) medication contained in a blue or a brown jar, controlled within subjects.

Behavioral: Baseline pain stimulationsBehavioral: ConditioningBehavioral: EvocationOther: Electroencephalography (EEG)

Interventions

During baseline pain stimulations, a comparison block will include 6 high- and 2 moderate-pain stimulations.

Nocebo induction
ConditioningBEHAVIORAL

During nocebo induction trials, the conditioned stimulus (i.e., a sham medical gel that can increase pain sensitivity, named "TDA" and contained in either a brown or a blue jar) is paired to unconditioned high-pain stimuli (nocebo trials). Lower 'baseline' pain is paired with no gel application (control trials).

Also known as: Nocebo Induction phase
Nocebo induction
EvocationBEHAVIORAL

During nocebo evocation, lower pain stimulations are administered both after the administration of the conditioned stimulus (i.e., a sham medical gel "TDA") and the control stimulus (no medical gel), in order to evoke nocebo responses to the sham hyperalgesic medication.

Also known as: Nocebo testing phase
Nocebo induction

In the single group of participants, EEG recordings will be conducted during baseline, during a first resting-state of 5-minutes, during induction/evocation of nocebo responses, and during a second resting-state of 5-minutes.

Nocebo induction

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 35 Years
Sexall(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsParticipants whose lived gender is male, will be included as male. Participants whose lived gender is female, will be included as female.
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18 - 35 years
  • Good understanding of the English language
  • Normal or corrected to normal vision

You may not qualify if:

  • Ever having experienced serious medical or psychiatric conditions (e.g., heart or lung disease, panic attacks, drug addiction, clinical depression),
  • Ever having experienced chronic pain complaints (pain for more than 6 months),
  • Having experienced persisting painful health problems in the last 6 months,
  • Experiencing acute physical pain (e.g., headache, or having used pain medication on the day of testing,
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding,
  • Having recent injuries to the wrists or arms on the day of testing,
  • Previous participation in this or similar studies (e.g., using conditioning or thermal pain).
  • Having consumed psychotropic medication, recreational drugs, analgesic medication, or more than 3 units of alcohol, in the 24 hours prior to the study appointment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Leiden University

Leiden, South Holland, 2333 AK, Netherlands

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic PainHyperalgesiaPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSomatosensory DisordersSensation DisordersNervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Andrea WM Evers, Prof. Dr.

    Leiden University Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
A double-blind randomization list was created by an independent researcher to randomize participants into two counterbalanced conditions: participants either receive the nocebo sham medical gel in a blue or in a brown jar. Complete blinding of the researchers during the experiment is not possible due to the nature of conditioning/ suggestion paradigms. Participants are blind with respect to the conditioning/nocebo manipulation.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2019

First Posted

December 16, 2019

Study Start

October 21, 2019

Primary Completion

January 7, 2020

Study Completion

January 7, 2020

Last Updated

January 9, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All data are collected pseudonymised thus no personal data are stored or shared. Consent forms are the only sources containing personal data and will not be shared, but are monitored by the department's Data Monitor.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Data will become available immediately after publication of the study and will be retained for 15 years.
Access Criteria
Data can be shared with scientists in relevant fields for the purpose of future studies such as replication or meta-analysis (or with designated persons for monitoring purposes).

Locations