Effects of Barley and Oat Breads on Appetite
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aimed to compare the postprandial effects of ß-glucan derived from oats bread (OB) and barley bread (BB) on appetite and glycemia. A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial included 20 healthy individuals. All participants consumed BB, white bread (WB), and whole wheat bread (WWB) with a standard breakfast and then were served an ad libitum lunch on four different days. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess appetite before breakfast and at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after breakfast. Blood glucose levels were measured at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. Postprandial appetite and glucose responses were quantified as the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) calculated according to the trapezoidal rule.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable healthy
Started Apr 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2021
CompletedFebruary 15, 2021
February 1, 2021
11 months
February 6, 2021
February 11, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Postprandial appetite response
The separate visual analog scale factors like hunger, fullness, desiring for eat, and prospective food consumption were combined to produce an additional measure termed 'composite appetite score'. This average appetite score was computed for 0, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes using the following equation: \[(hunger + desire to eat + prospective food consumption + (100 - fullness)\]/4 Total scale score changes in a range of 0-100. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Postprandial apetite response was quantified as incremental area under the curve (iAUC), which was calculated according to the trapezoidal rule by using composite appetite scores at time points 0, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Three hours postprandial period (from fasting to 180 minutes after the test breakfast)
Postprandial glucose response
Postprandial glucose response was quantified as incremental area under the curve (iAUC), which was calculated according to the trapezoidal rule by using serum glucose values at time points 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Two hours postprandial period (from fasting to 120 minutes after the test breakfast)
Subsequent energy consumption
Energy intake at ad libitum lunch was calculated.
Three hours after consuming the test breakfast (at 180 minutes)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Visual appeal of test bread
Immediately after consuming test meal (at 15 minutes)
Smell of test bread
Immediately after consuming test meal (at 15 minutes)
Taste of test bread
Immediately after consuming test meal (at 15 minutes)
Aftertaste of test bread
Immediately after consuming test meal (at 15 minutes)
Palatability of test bread
Immediately after consuming test meal (at 15 minutes)
Study Arms (4)
White Bread
ACTIVE COMPARATORWhite bread with a standard test breakfast
Whole Wheat Bread
ACTIVE COMPARATORWhole wheat bread with a standard test breakfast
Barley Bread
EXPERIMENTALBarley bread with a standard test breakfast
Oat Bread
EXPERIMENTALOat bread with a standard test breakfast
Interventions
Test breakfast with white bread was served after 12-hours of fasting and participants were asked to consume the meal in full, within 15 minutes.
In a crossover design, this bread was served with a standard breakfast to compare other breads.
In a crossover design, this bread was served with a standard breakfast to compare other breads.
In a crossover design, this bread was served with a standard breakfast to compare other breads.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy
- Normal-weight (BMI 18.5-25 kg/m2)
- years
- Having a \<3.5 score on the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (considered as unrestrictive eating behavior)
You may not qualify if:
- Applying an energy-restricted diet in the last three months
- Having a change in body weight \>5 kg in the last three months
- Vegans
- Having any chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, etc.
- Physician-diagnosed medications or conditions that influence metabolism
- Having fasting glucose \>100 mg/dl
- Smoking
- Exercising heavily
- Having chewing/swallowing difficulties or sensitivity/allergies to any food to be used in the study
- Lack of appetite
- Pregnant and lactating women
- Skipping breakfast meals
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Erciyes University Faculty of Health Sciences
Kayseri, Kayseri̇, 38039, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Caferoglu Z, Aytekin Sahin G, Gonulalan Z, Hatipoglu N. Effects of whole-grain barley and oat beta-glucans on postprandial glycemia and appetite: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Food Funct. 2022 Oct 3;13(19):10225-10234. doi: 10.1039/d2fo01717b.
PMID: 36124913DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zeynep Caferoglu, PhD
Erciyes University Faculty of Health Sciences 38039 Kayseri / Turkey
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2021
First Posted
February 11, 2021
Study Start
April 1, 2019
Primary Completion
March 1, 2020
Study Completion
February 1, 2021
Last Updated
February 15, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02