Synaptic Density and Progression of Huntington's Disease.
Longitudinal Measurement of Synaptic Density to Monitor Progression of Huntington's Disease.
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
AIM: To assess synaptic density and to investigate the potential relationship of regional synaptic loss with motor and non-motor symptoms and with disease progression in the human brain in vivo in patients with HD. DESIGN: The investigators will include 20 HD mutations carriers and 15 healthy controls. All subjects will undergo a clinical examination, with comprehensive assessment of motor and non-motor symptoms, and imaging evaluation consisting of 11C-UCB-J PET-CT and 18F-FDG PET-MR at baseline and after 2 years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 14, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 5, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 5, 2022
CompletedNovember 3, 2022
November 1, 2022
2.7 years
January 5, 2021
November 2, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Baseline differences in synaptic density.
Baseline differences (%) in (regional) synaptic density between patients and controls.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the baseline evaluation.
Baseline correlations between clinical scores and regional synaptic density.
Correlations between clinical scores and regional synaptic density in the patient group at baseline.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the baseline evaluation.
Differences in the rate of decline of synaptic density.
Differences (%) in the rate of decline of synaptic density between patients and controls.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.
Correlations between progression of the clinical scores and decline of synaptic density.
Correlations between progression of the clinical scores and decline of synaptic density in the patient group, after longitudinal follow up of 2 years.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Baseline differences in cerebral glucose metabolism.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the baseline evaluation.
Baseline correlations between clinical scores and cerebral glucose metabolism.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.
Differences in the rate of decline of cerebral glucose metabolism.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.
Correlations between progression of the clinical scores and decline of cerebral glucose metabolism in the patient group, after longitudinal follow up of 2 years.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.
Study Arms (2)
HD patients
EXPERIMENTALAt baseline and 2-year follow-up
Healthy controls
ACTIVE COMPARATORAt baseline and 2-year follow-up
Interventions
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) of synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) using the radioligand 11C-UCB-J.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) of glucose metabolism using the radioligand 18F-FDG, and brain MRI performed simultaneously.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 20-75 years.
- Capacity to understand the informed consent form.
- For HD group: CAG repeat expansion in HTT ≥ 40.
- Premanifest HD mutation carriers:
- \* No clinical diagnostic motor features of HD, defined as Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Diagnostic Confidence Score \< 4.
- Early manifest HD patients:
- Clinical diagnostic motor features of HD, defined as Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Diagnostic Confidence Score = 4.
- UHDRS-TFC score 7 or higher (Shoulson-Fahn stage 1 and 2).
You may not qualify if:
- neuropsychiatric diseases other than HD
- major internal medical diseases
- white matter lesion load on FLAIR Fazekas score 2 or higher or other relevant MRI abnormalities
- history of alcohol abuse or current alcohol abuse (chronic use of more than 15 units per week) or drug abuse
- contraindications for MR
- pregnancy
- previous participation in other research studies involving ionizing radiation with \>1 mSv in the previous 12 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UZ Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, 3000, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wim Vandenberghe, MD, PhD
UZ Leuven
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 5, 2021
First Posted
January 8, 2021
Study Start
January 14, 2020
Primary Completion
October 5, 2022
Study Completion
October 5, 2022
Last Updated
November 3, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Needs to be decided.