Reliability of Algometry in Swimming Athletes
Reliability of Algometry as a Clinical Value in Swimming Athletes
Reliability of Algometry as a Clinical Value in Swimming Athletes
Sponsor study identifier
observational
48
1 country
1
Study Start
January 3, 2020
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
March 16, 2020
Actual (reported)Study Completion
March 16, 2020
Actual (reported)In the competitive swimming scenario, there is a significant incidence of pain, which can be justified by the high levels of training that exposes athletes to constant stress. In this way, the quantification of pain and its monitoring becomes extremely important for clinical practice. A commonly used tool with easy access and clinical applicability, capable of measuring the pain threshold (PT) in a standardized manner is the pressure algometer. However, there is a shortage in the literature of studies that evaluate the reliability of this instrument in healthy swimming athletes. Objectives: Evaluate the intra and inter-examiner reliability and to describe the profile of the PT measurements measured by the algometer in swimming athletes. Methods: It is a reliability study, and will be composed of fifty young athletes members of swimming teams, of both genders, aged between 12 and 20 years. The evaluation will be carried out on the same day and in 2 steps: (1) Test and (2) Retest. In the first step, through a third examiner, the participants will be subjected to marking of points in pre-determined muscles and in points of referred pain. Next, they will perform the PT assessment through the algometer by two other distinct and trained examiners. The interval between each examiner will be five minutes with the participant at rest. After five minutes the test was performed, the step retest will begin, which will have the same procedures as in the previous step. The statistical package SPSS Statistics 23.0 will be used to conduct the analyzes.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
March 16, 2020
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
January 3, 2020
Actual (reported)March 16, 2020
Actual (reported)March 16, 2020
Actual (reported)January 4, 2021
Actual (reported)January 6, 2021
Actual (reported)Pain threshold
Portable hand pressure algometer (FPX 50/220, Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, USA), measured in kg / cm² (kilogram per centimeter squared).
two hours
In the test stage, pain threshold evaluations were started through the algometer in a randomized manner by two different examiners trained and experienced in the application of the test, following the same order of evaluation of the muscles (middle deltoid, upper trapezius, pectoralis major, biceps brachii , triceps, lumbar multifidus, rectus femoris, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior and soleus, bilaterally), with an interval between each assessment of five minutes in which the participants remained at rest. After the interval described, the retest stage was initiated, which had the same procedures as the test stage.
The evaluation with the algometer was carried out in the same way by the two examiners, who held the instrument with the dominant hand, in order to adjust and coordinate the movements, while the non-dominant hand was used to stabilize the participant's skin, providing more security, avoiding thus small deviations. The pressure was applied at an angle of 90 ° (between the tool surface and the evaluated point), the rate of pressure increase was approximately 2 kg / cm² / s (kilogram per centimeter squared per second), up to the level that the participant reported a change in the sensation of pressure to a sensation of discomfort and immediately the examiner removed the device from the positioned location.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Young swimming athletes who regularly train and are members of the swimming teams of the 4th region of the state of São Paulo, of the São Paulo Aquatic Federation (FAP), of the cities of Presidente Prudente, Votuporanga and São José do Rio Preto.
University of Sao Paulo State
Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, 19060-900, Brazil
48 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
January 4, 2021
First Posted
January 6, 2021
Study Start
January 3, 2020
Actual (reported)Effect of Light-Emitting Diode on the Strenght and Resistence Capacities of Cycling Athletes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
March 16, 2020
Actual (reported)Study Completion
March 16, 2020
Actual (reported)Last Updated
January 12, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Individual data will not be released, because participants are under eighteen.
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: