NCT04693494

Brief Summary

this study compares motor development of two groups of healthy term babies at the end of their first year of life. Parents of the intervention group have received a training program consisting in advices about correct positions, stimuli, how to play or how to carry their babies. The purpose of this study is to know if motor development can be improved by the environment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
82

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2019

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 7, 2020

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 28, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 5, 2021

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 17, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 16, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

December 28, 2020

Last Update Submit

May 13, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

motor milestonestermnewbornmotor development

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Score of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) at month 9

    AIMS is a validated observational scale for measurement of motor milestones. Higher scores mean a better outcome. Depending on the score, the percentile is obtained.

    9 months old

  • Score of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) at month 12

    AIMS is a validated observational scale for measurement of motor milestones. Higher scores mean a better outcome. Depending on the score, the percentile is obtained.Depending on the score, the percentile is obtained.

    12 months old

  • Score of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) at month 15

    AIMS is a validated observational scale for measurement of motor milestones. Higher scores mean a better outcome. Depending on the score, the percentile is obtained.

    15 months old

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Four training sessions (before the baby is 1 month old, at 3 months, at 6 and at 9 months old) teaching the main motor milestones to get in the next 3 months and how to help infants with the correct stimuli, positions or plays; triptychs containing the main points explained at the session and links to short videos about the given advices. Three evaluations of motor milestones at the age of 9, 12, and 15 months old

Other: Training program

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Three evaluations of motor milestones at the age of 9, 12, and 15 months old

Interventions

Training program consisting in 4 sessions with information about milestones to achieve and advices for motor development. Triptychs and short videos containing the main points containing the main points.

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Day - 9 Months
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy-term infants
  • Male and female
  • Apgar score of at least 7 in the first minute and at five minutes.
  • Natural or cesarean birth
  • Absence of congenital malformations or orthopedic injury
  • Absence of known congenital or genetic pathology
  • Normal neurological medical examination of the newborn at hospital discharge.

You may not qualify if:

  • Newborns who have required hospitalization before being enrolled.
  • Multiple births

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universidad San Jorge

Zaragoza, Aragon, 50019, Spain

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Fernandez-Sola L, Cano-Diez B, Pons-Solaz Y, Vera-Egido B, Moreno-Gonzalez S. Effectiveness of a training program for the acquisition of motor milestones in infants: a randomized clinical trial. Ital J Pediatr. 2025 Jan 31;51(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13052-025-01849-4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psychomotor Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Luis Fernández Sola, Physical Th

    Universidad San Jorge

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Beatriz Cano Díez, Physical Th

    Universidad San Pablo CEU

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Double blinded: spontaneous behavior of babies is evaluated, that doesn't depend of having knowledge of the intervention. Outcomes assessor doesn't know the evaluated baby group.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Intervention and control group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Physical Therapist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2020

First Posted

January 5, 2021

Study Start

December 1, 2019

Primary Completion

December 7, 2020

Study Completion

January 17, 2023

Last Updated

May 16, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All collected IPD after deidentified

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
5 years
Access Criteria
Información will be shared with editors or other investigators

Locations