Effectiveness of a Training Program for Parents of Babies in Their First Year of Life to Achieve Motor Milestones
1 other identifier
interventional
82
1 country
1
Brief Summary
this study compares motor development of two groups of healthy term babies at the end of their first year of life. Parents of the intervention group have received a training program consisting in advices about correct positions, stimuli, how to play or how to carry their babies. The purpose of this study is to know if motor development can be improved by the environment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 7, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 17, 2023
CompletedMay 16, 2024
May 1, 2024
1 year
December 28, 2020
May 13, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Score of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) at month 9
AIMS is a validated observational scale for measurement of motor milestones. Higher scores mean a better outcome. Depending on the score, the percentile is obtained.
9 months old
Score of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) at month 12
AIMS is a validated observational scale for measurement of motor milestones. Higher scores mean a better outcome. Depending on the score, the percentile is obtained.Depending on the score, the percentile is obtained.
12 months old
Score of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) at month 15
AIMS is a validated observational scale for measurement of motor milestones. Higher scores mean a better outcome. Depending on the score, the percentile is obtained.
15 months old
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALFour training sessions (before the baby is 1 month old, at 3 months, at 6 and at 9 months old) teaching the main motor milestones to get in the next 3 months and how to help infants with the correct stimuli, positions or plays; triptychs containing the main points explained at the session and links to short videos about the given advices. Three evaluations of motor milestones at the age of 9, 12, and 15 months old
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONThree evaluations of motor milestones at the age of 9, 12, and 15 months old
Interventions
Training program consisting in 4 sessions with information about milestones to achieve and advices for motor development. Triptychs and short videos containing the main points containing the main points.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy-term infants
- Male and female
- Apgar score of at least 7 in the first minute and at five minutes.
- Natural or cesarean birth
- Absence of congenital malformations or orthopedic injury
- Absence of known congenital or genetic pathology
- Normal neurological medical examination of the newborn at hospital discharge.
You may not qualify if:
- Newborns who have required hospitalization before being enrolled.
- Multiple births
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad San Jorge
Zaragoza, Aragon, 50019, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Fernandez-Sola L, Cano-Diez B, Pons-Solaz Y, Vera-Egido B, Moreno-Gonzalez S. Effectiveness of a training program for the acquisition of motor milestones in infants: a randomized clinical trial. Ital J Pediatr. 2025 Jan 31;51(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13052-025-01849-4.
PMID: 39891196DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luis Fernández Sola, Physical Th
Universidad San Jorge
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Beatriz Cano Díez, Physical Th
Universidad San Pablo CEU
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double blinded: spontaneous behavior of babies is evaluated, that doesn't depend of having knowledge of the intervention. Outcomes assessor doesn't know the evaluated baby group.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physical Therapist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 28, 2020
First Posted
January 5, 2021
Study Start
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 7, 2020
Study Completion
January 17, 2023
Last Updated
May 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 5 years
- Access Criteria
- Información will be shared with editors or other investigators
All collected IPD after deidentified