Treatment of Residual Hypermetropic Refraction on Pseudophakic Patients Using Allogenic Fresh Myopic Lenticule
ReLex-Smile
Successful Treatment of Residual Hypermetropic Refraction on Pseudophakic Patients Using Allogenic Fresh Myopic Lenticule Implantation with ReLex-Smile Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The residual hypermetropic refraction on pseudophakic(Trifocal IOL) patients is difficult to treat surgically. In addition, there are not many suitable options to offer such patients presenting with this condition. Two current common surgeries to treat residual hyperopic refraction are refractive lens exchange (RLE) and excimer laser ablation (LASIK or PRK). Laser procedures: Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK); Laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK); Risks of LASIK include abnormalities of the corneal flap, epithelial ingrowth, corneal ectasia, refractive surprises, irregular astigmatism, decentration, visual aberrations, a loss of BCVA, infectious keratitis, symptoms, and diffuse lamellar keratitis. Refractive lens exchange (RLE); The risks of RLE are similar to those of cataract surgery and include endophthalmitis, a loss of accommodation, vitreous loss with posterior capsular rupture, and retinal detachment. The method used at the EYE Hospital Pristina using fresh lenticule implantation by ReLex-SMILE is safe and effective method, since there is no flap this prevents invasive damage to the anterior surface of the cornea contrary to the LASIK where flap is present posing risk for epithelial ingrowth. Before SMILE,YAG-laser capsulotomy should be performed on all patients, regardless of posterior capsule ossification, in pseudophakic patients with residual refraction. When the YAG-laser is applied after the SMILE,there will be a diopter change.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2027
ExpectedFebruary 25, 2025
February 1, 2025
2 years
December 29, 2020
February 24, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
increasing of visual acuity
using fresh myopic corneal lenticule for treatment of residual hypermetropic refraction on pseudophakic patients
12 months
Study Arms (1)
FRESH CORNEAL LENTICULE IMPLANTATION
OTHERThe aim of this study is to investigate the effect of fresh corneal myopic lenticule implantation as allogenic implant that will be taken from myopic patients to implant on pseudophakic patients with residual hypermetropic refraction using VisuMax Femtosecond Laser-Smile module surgery with primary objective to assess(increase) visual acuity.
Interventions
VisuMax femtosecond laser performed flap-cut procedure with an energy cut index of 30 nJ (150nJ), spot and track spacing surface cut of 4.5 μm, side cut 2.0 μm were used to create an intrastromal pocket into the patient's cornea to receive the donor lenticule. The stromal pocket diameter was set 7.6 to 8.0 mm (1 mm larger than the optical zone of the donor lenticule) and cap thickness was set to 130 μm from corneal surface and a 4 mm superior incision. Hinge position flap was set at 90°, angle 50° and width 4 mm, side cut angle 90°. The pocket was dissected using a blunt spatula washed with normal saline. The lenticule was held with lenticule forceps and gently inserted into the pocket through the 4 mm superior incision. Incision position changed according to the position of the highest K values. Current orientation was marked with a sterile skin marker. The lenticule was positioned around the marked center of the cone and flattened out from the surface using a blunt spatula.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- residual hypermetropic refraction on pseudophakic patients
- low visual acuity
You may not qualify if:
- active anterior segment pathologic features,
- previous corneal or anterior segment surgery,
- glaucoma,
- retinal detachment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Eye Hospital Pristina
Pristina, 10000, Kosovo
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- pseudophakic (Trifocal IOL) group 492 patients-246 eyes residual hyperopic group 34 patients-38 eyes
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Ophthalmology Department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 29, 2020
First Posted
December 31, 2020
Study Start
April 1, 2018
Primary Completion
April 1, 2020
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Last Updated
February 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02