NCT04692012

Brief Summary

The residual hypermetropic refraction on pseudophakic(Trifocal IOL) patients is difficult to treat surgically. In addition, there are not many suitable options to offer such patients presenting with this condition. Two current common surgeries to treat residual hyperopic refraction are refractive lens exchange (RLE) and excimer laser ablation (LASIK or PRK). Laser procedures: Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK); Laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK); Risks of LASIK include abnormalities of the corneal flap, epithelial ingrowth, corneal ectasia, refractive surprises, irregular astigmatism, decentration, visual aberrations, a loss of BCVA, infectious keratitis, symptoms, and diffuse lamellar keratitis. Refractive lens exchange (RLE); The risks of RLE are similar to those of cataract surgery and include endophthalmitis, a loss of accommodation, vitreous loss with posterior capsular rupture, and retinal detachment. The method used at the EYE Hospital Pristina using fresh lenticule implantation by ReLex-SMILE is safe and effective method, since there is no flap this prevents invasive damage to the anterior surface of the cornea contrary to the LASIK where flap is present posing risk for epithelial ingrowth. Before SMILE,YAG-laser capsulotomy should be performed on all patients, regardless of posterior capsule ossification, in pseudophakic patients with residual refraction. When the YAG-laser is applied after the SMILE,there will be a diopter change.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
9mo left

Started Apr 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress92%
Apr 2018Feb 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2018

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2020

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 29, 2020

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 31, 2020

Completed
6.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2027

Expected
Last Updated

February 25, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

December 29, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 24, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • increasing of visual acuity

    using fresh myopic corneal lenticule for treatment of residual hypermetropic refraction on pseudophakic patients

    12 months

Study Arms (1)

FRESH CORNEAL LENTICULE IMPLANTATION

OTHER

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of fresh corneal myopic lenticule implantation as allogenic implant that will be taken from myopic patients to implant on pseudophakic patients with residual hypermetropic refraction using VisuMax Femtosecond Laser-Smile module surgery with primary objective to assess(increase) visual acuity.

Other: FRESH CORNEAL MYOPIC LENTICULE IMPLANTATION

Interventions

VisuMax femtosecond laser performed flap-cut procedure with an energy cut index of 30 nJ (150nJ), spot and track spacing surface cut of 4.5 μm, side cut 2.0 μm were used to create an intrastromal pocket into the patient's cornea to receive the donor lenticule. The stromal pocket diameter was set 7.6 to 8.0 mm (1 mm larger than the optical zone of the donor lenticule) and cap thickness was set to 130 μm from corneal surface and a 4 mm superior incision. Hinge position flap was set at 90°, angle 50° and width 4 mm, side cut angle 90°. The pocket was dissected using a blunt spatula washed with normal saline. The lenticule was held with lenticule forceps and gently inserted into the pocket through the 4 mm superior incision. Incision position changed according to the position of the highest K values. Current orientation was marked with a sterile skin marker. The lenticule was positioned around the marked center of the cone and flattened out from the surface using a blunt spatula.

Also known as: Relex smile surgery
FRESH CORNEAL LENTICULE IMPLANTATION

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • residual hypermetropic refraction on pseudophakic patients
  • low visual acuity

You may not qualify if:

  • active anterior segment pathologic features,
  • previous corneal or anterior segment surgery,
  • glaucoma,
  • retinal detachment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Eye Hospital Pristina

Pristina, 10000, Kosovo

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PseudophakiaHyperopiaMyopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsRefractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
pseudophakic (Trifocal IOL) group 492 patients-246 eyes residual hyperopic group 34 patients-38 eyes
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: pseudophakic group hyperopic group myopic group
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Ophthalmology Department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2020

First Posted

December 31, 2020

Study Start

April 1, 2018

Primary Completion

April 1, 2020

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Locations