Lower Femtosecond Laser Energy Levels Lead to Better Visual Recovery After Small-incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), the most recently developed refractive surgical technique, is being performed in a growing number of cases. This intrastromal keratomileusis using only a femtosecond laser is a new procedure that extracts the refractive lenticule through a small corneal incision ranging from 2 to 5 mm, with the absence of a flap and the preservation of the anterior-most stromal lamellae and Bowman's layer (except for the region of the small incision). Many studies have demonstrated that SMILE achieved comparable or superior efficacy, safety, and predictability to femtosecond laser -assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx). However, the recovery of visual acuity in the early postoperative period after SMILE is slower, compared to other refractive surgery techniques. Therefore, adjusting energy might improve postoperative visual acuity and recovery time after SMILE. Nevertheless, the optimal parameters drawn from a well-organized randomized study have yet to be elucidated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the optimal femtosecond laser energy, with the aim of improving clinical outcomes during the early postoperative period after SMILE for the correction of myopia. To this end, we used a 500 kHz VisuMax with spot-spacing control at energy levels lower than 115 nJ, based on the previous studies. Therefore, we prospectively compared visual outcomes of two groups randomly divided by different laser energies: one underwent SMILE using lower energy levels of 100, 105, and 110 nJ (L-SMILE), while the other group underwent SMILE at energy levels conventionally used of 115 to 150 nJ (C-SMILE).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 16, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 26, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 12, 2017
CompletedApril 12, 2017
April 1, 2017
2 months
March 26, 2017
April 5, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Uncorrected Distance Vision Acuity
Uncorrected Distance Vision Acuity bya Snellen visual acuity chart
within the first 90 days after surgery
Corneal aberration
Corneal aberration automatically recoreded by a wavefront analysis machine
within the first 90 days after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
surface roughness of lenticules
immediately after SMILE surgery
Study Arms (2)
lower energy
EXPERIMENTALSMILE procedure using lower energy (100, 105, and 110 nJ)
conventional energy (115 to 150 nJ)
ACTIVE COMPARATORSMILE procedure using conventional energy (115 to 150 nJ)
Interventions
Based on the review of literature, we regarded SMILE using energy levels of 115 nJ or higher as 'conventional' energy-SMILE (C-SMILE). Since 500kHz VisuMax femtosecond laser used in this study had a threshold photodisruption energy level of 100 nJ, lowest energy level of L-SMILE was set at 100 nJ. Because the spot distance must be changed by approximately 1 μm when laser energy changed by 50 nJ, we could set the maximum laser energy to 150 (100 + 50) nJ as highest one of C-SMILE while keeping the spot distance constant. Finally, we established two groups divided by different laser energies: L-SMILE group using lower energy levels of 100, 105, and 110 nJ, and C-SMILE group using 'conventional', not higher, energy levels of 115 to 150 nJ.
The SMILE procedures were conducted in the Eyereum Eye Clinic (Seoul, South Korea). The target postoperative refraction was emmetropia. The surgery, using standardized techniques, was performed by an experienced surgeon (D.S.Y.K.) using the VisuMax system. The surgical parameters used during SMILE were as follows: repetition rate of 500 kHz, pulse energy 100 to 150 nJ (100, 105, and 110 nJ, L-SMILE; 115 to 150 nJ, C-SMILE), spot distance 4.5 μm (regardless of FSL energy), cap thickness 120 μm, and side-cut width 2 mm in the 12-o'clock position with an angle of 90°. After the anterior (upper) and posterior (lower) delineated plane of the intrastromal lenticule were well defined, the anterior and posterior interface were dissected with a micro-spatula with a blunt circular tip and extracted with micro-forceps. The integrity of the lenticule was also checked subsequently.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age of 20 years or older.
- corneal thickness of more than 500 μm
- manifest refractive sphere of -3.00 to -6.00 diopters (D)
- manifest refractive cylinder less than 6.00 D
- stable refractive error with less than a 0.50 D change in sphere and cylinder in the previous year
- corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/20 or better in both eyes
You may not qualify if:
- severe ocular surface disease
- any corneal disease, cataract, glaucoma, macular disease, or previous history of intraocular or corneal surgery
- Patients with suspicion of keratoconus on corneal topography
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei Univeristy College of Medicine
Seoul, Seoul, 03722, South Korea
Related Publications (3)
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes. Eye Vis (Lond). 2014 Oct 16;1:3. doi: 10.1186/s40662-014-0003-1. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 26605350BACKGROUNDWang JS, Xie HT, Jia Y, Zhang MC. Small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond lenticule extraction for myopic: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan 18;10(1):115-121. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.01.19. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28149787BACKGROUNDDonate D, Thaeron R. Lower Energy Levels Improve Visual Recovery in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). J Refract Surg. 2016 Aug 1;32(9):636-42. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160602-01.
PMID: 27598734BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2017
First Posted
April 12, 2017
Study Start
November 16, 2016
Primary Completion
January 15, 2017
Study Completion
January 15, 2017
Last Updated
April 12, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share