Foley Catheter Versus Double-balloon Catheter for Cervical Ripening
1 other identifier
observational
222
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare pregnancy results which were used foley catheter or double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening among high-risk pregnant women.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2020
CompletedFebruary 7, 2022
January 1, 2022
5 months
December 21, 2020
January 24, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
bishop score
bishop score \>6 is accepted as successful ripening. (max. 10, and the higher bishop score means better ripening has been occurred.)
at the time of removing the cervical ripening catheter or when the balloon was expelled spontaneously
vaginal delivery rate
the difference in vaginal birth rate between groups
until the patient gives birth
vaginal delivery within 24 hours
the difference in vaginal delivery within 24 hours rate between groups
from the time of cervical ripening catheter insertion to the 24 hours
Study Arms (3)
Foley catheter group
mechanical cervical ripening
Double-balloon group
mechanical cervical ripening
Cook cervical ripening balloon
mechanical cervical ripening
Interventions
mechanical cervical ripening with a foley catheter or double-balloon catheter or Cook cervical ripening balloon
Eligibility Criteria
Pregnant women with unfavorable cervices and need to deliver for maternal or fetal health condition.
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 40
- Singleton pregnancy
- Vertex presentation
- Bishop score \<6
- Using a Foley catheter or cook balloon for cervical ripening
- High-risk pregnancy (Oligohydramnios, polyhydramnios, intrauterine growth retardation, pregestational or gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders)
You may not qualify if:
- Being younger than 18 or over 40
- Communication problems (foreign national)
- Bishop score \>6
- Being at active labor
- Multifetal pregnancy
- Non-vertex presentation
- Scarred uterus (cesarean or myomectomy)
- Fetal structural or chromosomal anomaly
- Non-reassuring fetal cardiotocography before cervical ripening
- Regional anesthesia during the first stage
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Health Sciences, Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Care, Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, 06000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Pennell CE, Henderson JJ, O'Neill MJ, McChlery S, Doherty DA, Dickinson JE. Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel. BJOG. 2009 Oct;116(11):1443-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
PMID: 19656148BACKGROUNDSayed Ahmed WA, Ibrahim ZM, Ashor OE, Mohamed ML, Ahmed MR, Elshahat AM. Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Nov;42(11):1489-1494. doi: 10.1111/jog.13086. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
PMID: 27436681BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2020
First Posted
December 29, 2020
Study Start
July 1, 2020
Primary Completion
November 30, 2020
Study Completion
November 30, 2020
Last Updated
February 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01