Oxytocin vs Prostaglandins for Labor Induction of Women With an Unfavorable Cervix After 24h of Cervical Ripening
OPIC
Oxytocine Versus Prostaglandines Pour le déclenchement du Travail Des Femmes Dont le Col Est défavorable après 24 Heures de Maturation Cervicale : Essai Multicentrique randomisé de Non infériorité
2 other identifiers
interventional
1,494
1 country
12
Brief Summary
Twenty-two percent of deliveries in France are induced. In cases where labor is induced and cervix is unfavorable, cervical ripening prior oxytocin administration is advised in order to reduce the risk of cesarean delivery. Cervical ripening agents, pharmacological (prostaglandins) or mechanical are administered during 24 hours. After 24 hours, most women will be either delivered or in labor but 25% of women will require further induction of labor. For 16% of women who undergo cervical ripening, whatever the cervical ripening method, the cervix remains unchanged after 24 hours. The management of these women is not consensual and depends on the maternity unit where women are cared for. This study seeks to identify the most appropriate strategy for the management of women with an unfavorable cervix after 24 hours of cervical ripening, a strategy which would be associated with the lowest maternal and perinatal morbidity but also with the best maternal satisfaction. Because both strategies are practiced in France, the trial would compare: induction of labor with oxytocin and repeated cervical ripening. The aim is to show that repeating cervical ripening is an unnecessary procedure. And more specifically that oxytocin administration is not associated with a higher caesarean delivery rate and that it reduces the time to delivery in comparison with cervical ripening with prostaglandins.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Sep 2021
Longer than P75 for phase_3
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 28, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
December 1, 2025
November 1, 2025
4.9 years
June 3, 2021
November 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cesarean delivery rate
The main outcome is the rate of caesarean delivery, whatever the indication of the caesarean delivery
Up to 2 days after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Time from intervention to delivery in hours
Up to 2 days after intervention
The proportion of women who delivered within 12 hours of the intervention
Up to 12 hours after intervention
Maternal satisfaction, assessed with the self administered ACE Questionnaire for Assessing Childbirth Experience (QACE)
1 month
The proportion of women who require induction with oxytocin (for women in the control group)
Up to 2 days after intervention
The indications of caesarean in case of caesarean delivery
Up to 2 days after intervention
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (5)
Number and rate of children with an Apgar score under 7
Up to 2 days after intervention
Number and rate of children with neonatal acidosis defined as umbilical arterial pH <7,00
Up to 2 days after intervention
Number and rate of children with early neonatal infection
Up to 7 days after delivery
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Induction of labor
EXPERIMENTALwomen randomized in the experimental group will be admitted to the labor ward to undergo induction of labor with intra-veinous oxytocin and early amniotomy. Oxytocin will be administered according to the French guidelines for induction of labor. Maximum oxytocin used should not exceed 10 UI.
Second cervical ripening
ACTIVE COMPARATORwomen randomized in the control group will undergo a second cervical ripening lasting a maximum of 24 hours with either: * Vaginal slow releasing system of dinoprostone PROPESS® which is inserted in the vagina, against the cervix and left in place during 24 hours. * Oral misoprostol (ANGUSTA®) 25 µg every 2 hours, 8 times (maximum dosage should not exceed 200µg). Tablets will be given one at the time by midwives. * Vaginal gel of dinoprostone (2 mg PROSTINE®) every 6 hours, maximum dose of 6 mg. The choice of the cervical ripening agent will depend of the local protocol of the participating maternity unit. The choice between ANGUSTA®, PROPESS® and PROSTINE® will be made by investigators of each participating unit at the beginning of the trial. At the end of the second cervical ripening procedure women not in labor will be transferred to the labor ward for induction of labor with oxytocin.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant woman
- ≥ 18 years old
- With a singleton cephalic pregnancy
- ≥37+0 weeks of gestation
- Gestational age estimated from the first trimester ultrasound (realized between 11+0 and 13+6 weeks of gestation)
- With a medical indication of labor with a previous pharmacological or mechanical cervical ripening of 24 hours
- French health insurance policy holder
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Any measures of legal protection
- Prior caesarean section or uterine scar
- Contra-indications to a vaginal delivery
- Foetus with suspected severe congenital abnormalities
- Pathological foetal heart rate
- Contra-indications to ANGUSTA® (oral misoprostol, cervical ripening agent)
- Contra-indications to PROPESS® (vaginal slow releasing system of dinoprostone, cervical ripening agent)
- Contra-indications to PROSTINE® (vaginal gel of dinoprostone, cervical ripening agent)
- Contra-indications for using oxytocin
- Woman in labor
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (12)
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Angers
Angers, 49033, France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33076, France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Brest
Brest, 29609, France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63001, France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, Hospital St Joseph, Marseille
Marseille, 13008, France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Nancy
Nancy, 54000, France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Nantes
Nantes, 44093, France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Orléans
Orléans, 45100, France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, Port Royal Maternity Hospital, Paris
Paris, 75014, France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Poitiers
Poitiers, 86000, France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Saint Etienne
Saint-Etienne, 42270, France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Tours
Tours, 37044, France
Related Publications (1)
De Berti M, Le Gouge A, Monmousseau F, Gallot D, Sentilhes L, Winer N, Legendre G, Desbriere R, Girault A, Pozzi J, Gachon B, Barjat T, Perrotin F, Brunet-Houdard S, Diguisto C; Groupe de Recherche en Gynecologie Obstetrique. Oxytocin versus prostaglandins for labour Induction of women with an unfavourable cervix after 24 hours of cervical ripening (OPIC): protocol for an open multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 17;13(4):e058282. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058282.
PMID: 37068892DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Caroline DIGUISTO, MD
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2021
First Posted
July 2, 2021
Study Start
September 28, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Data will be available immediately following publication and ending in 5 years
- Access Criteria
- Contact with the corresponding author
Individual participant data after de-identification can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author