NCT01620814

Brief Summary

Comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostol for the purpose of cervical ripening before diagnostic hysteroscopy in the women at the reproductive age:RANDOMİSED,CONTROLLED PROSPECTİVE TRİAL Objective. Comparison with one another and with control group of vaginal dinoprostol and misoprostol with for the purpose of cervical ripening before diagnostic hysteroscopy. Population: It was planned for performing to 95 women who appealed to gynecology polyclinic and will be performed diagnostic hysteroscopy. Methods: Eighty-six women who will be performed diagnostic hysteroscopy assigned as randomize to three groups. It was planned that none procedure will be applied to group 1 for cervical ripening, vaginal misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone will be practiced to Groups 2 and 3, respectively.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2012

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 7, 2012

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 15, 2012

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

August 7, 2012

Status Verified

August 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

June 7, 2012

Last Update Submit

August 6, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

misoprostoldinoprostonecervical ripeningdiagnostic hysteroscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • need for cervical dilatation

    In the all three groups, patients being necessary cervical dilatation will be determined and their rates will be calculated.

    2 Months

  • Duration of cervical dilatation

    In the patients being necessary cervical dilatation, elapsed time for dilatation will be calculated.

    2 Months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Ease of dilatation

    2 Months

  • Dilatation complications

    2 Months

  • Adverse effects

    2 Months

Study Arms (3)

Dinoprostone and misoprostol

EXPERIMENTAL

For the purpose of cervical ripening none procedure will be performed to Group 1, while vaginal misoprostole of 200 mg and vaginal dinoprostone will be applied to Group 2 and 3, respectively. While misoprostol will be implanted 3 hours before procedure, but dinoprostone will be implanted 6 hours before procedure. Before drug implantation for determination of the cervical insufficiency and measure of the cervical canal's opening, bougies will be applied toward to back from 8 no- hegar bougie. After drugs administration, cervical canal will be again evaluated with above mentioned way by bougie before hysteroscopy

Drug: DinoprostoneDrug: misoprostol

Misoprostol and control

EXPERIMENTAL

For the purpose of cervical ripening none procedure will be performed to Group 1, while vaginal misoprostole of 200 mg and vaginal dinoprostone will be applied to Group 2 and 3, respectively. While misoprostol will be implanted 3 hours before procedure, but dinoprostone will be implanted 6 hours before procedure. Before drug implantation for determination of the cervical insufficiency and measure of the cervical canal's opening, bougies will be applied toward to back from 8 no- hegar bougie.

Drug: misoprostolDrug: control

dinoprostone and control

EXPERIMENTAL

For the purpose of cervical ripening none procedure will be performed to Group 1, while vaginal misoprostole of 200 mg and vaginal dinoprostone will be applied to Group 2 and 3, respectively. While misoprostol will be implanted 3 hours before procedure, but dinoprostone will be implanted 6 hours before procedure. Before drug implantation for determination of the cervical insufficiency and measure of the cervical canal's opening, bougies will be applied toward to back from 8 no- hegar bougie.

Drug: DinoprostoneDrug: control

Interventions

Also known as: group 3
Dinoprostone and misoprostoldinoprostone and control
Also known as: group 2
Dinoprostone and misoprostolMisoprostol and control
Also known as: group 1
Misoprostol and controldinoprostone and control

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 35 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • on the HSG,USG or SIS,
  • women at the age of primary or secondary infertile reproductive suspected for intrauterine pathology,
  • no contraindication for hysteroscopy and reproductive age

You may not qualify if:

  • women are with allergy against to prostaglandins,
  • with diseases in which prostaglandin usage is contraindicated,
  • pregnant,
  • don't given approval,
  • with cervical surgery history and cervical insufficiency.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Zekai Tahir Burak Women Health Education Research Hospital

Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Inal HA, Ozturk Inal ZH, Tonguc E, Var T. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening before diagnostic hysteroscopy in nulliparous women. Fertil Steril. 2015 May;103(5):1326-31. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.037. Epub 2015 Feb 21.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

DinoprostoneMisoprostol

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostaglandins EProstaglandinsEicosanoidsFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFatty AcidsLipidsAutacoidsInflammation MediatorsBiological FactorsProstaglandins E, SyntheticProstaglandins, Synthetic

Central Study Contacts

Esra Tonguc, M.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assoc.Prof

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2012

First Posted

June 15, 2012

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion

August 1, 2012

Study Completion

September 1, 2012

Last Updated

August 7, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-08

Locations