NCT04681378

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the short term operative outcomes of three different surgical techniques for uterine incision closure during cesarean section (CS). This trial enrolled 120 patients scheduled for primary cesarean delivery. Patients were randomized into either classical double layer uterine closure, purse string double layer uterine closure (Turan), or our new approach of uterine closure (double layer step up-step down technique). For short term comparison, transvaginal ultrasonography was planned for all patients 6 weeks after surgery. Compared to group II and Group III, residual myometrial thickness was significantly thinner in group I (P\< 0.001). The number of patients with uterine niche was 10 (50% of all scar defects) in group I whereas it was 4 (20%) in group II and 6 (30%) in group III. Operative time was significantly longer in group II (P\< 0.001). This led to our conclusion that Turan technique and our new approach are associated with thicker myometrial thickness and less frequency of uterine scar defect than classical double layer uterine incision closure; however, our approach takes less operative time.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2017

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2019

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 18, 2020

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 23, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 28, 2020

Status Verified

December 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

December 18, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 23, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Cesarean SectionUterine Incision Closure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • residual myometrial thickness

    The cesarean scar site was identified as a small triangular anechoic defect in the anterior wall of the uterus (uterine niche). In these patients RMT was measured from the top of niche to serosal surface. In patients without a scar defect RMT was measured from the delineation of the endometrium to the serosal surface at the level of CS scar and total myometrial thickness was measured at the myometrium adjacent to CS scar in all patients

    6 weeks after surgery

Study Arms (3)

Classical double layer closure

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

a holding Vicryl 1-0 was placed in the in the left corner to stabilize and define the demarcation of the suture line. A continuous unlocked stitch beginning at the right corner was used, closing the whole thickness of the uterine wall, including the decidual layer. The second unlocked stitch was performed by Vicryl 1-0 in a lateral -lateral (horizontal) position, adapting the first layer. Up to three additional single sutures were added for hemostasis if required.

Procedure: double layer step up-step down technique

Turan technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

beginning in one corner, the incision is closed using Vicryl 1-0 stitch. The first layer is transversely passed through the inner myometrium-decidua line, and second layer is transversely passed through outer myometrium-visceral line continuously in the form of a purse string closure. With this technique, the original string is returned to the starting point and tied with a knot. Following the double layered purse-string closure, the aperture left in the middle of the uterine incision is closed with one separate figure of eight suture

Procedure: double layer step up-step down technique

Double layer step up-step down technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

the incision is closed using Vicryl 1-0 stitch starting from one corner. The first layer is transversely passed through the inner myometrium-decidua line, and second layer is transversely passed through outer myometrium-visceral line continuously by alternating continuous stitches through the upper (step up) and the lower (step down) uterine flaps. The original string is returned to the starting point and tied with knot as in Turan technique. Following the double layered step up-step down closure, additional single sutures were added for hemostasis if required

Procedure: double layer step up-step down technique

Interventions

the incision is closed using Vicryl 1-0 stitch starting from one corner. The first layer is transversely passed through the inner myometrium-decidua line, and second layer is transversely passed through outer myometrium-visceral line continuously by alternating continuous stitches through the upper (step up) and the lower (step down) uterine flaps. The original string is returned to the starting point and tied with knot as in Turan technique. Following the double layered step up-step down closure, additional single sutures were added for hemostasis if required

Classical double layer closureDouble layer step up-step down techniqueTuran technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • pregnant women with a singleton prior cesarean section
  • first-time cesarean delivery
  • without preterm rupture of membranes, contractions or cervical dilatations

You may not qualify if:

  • women under age of 18 years
  • history of previous CS or any other uterine surgery
  • placenta previa, abruptio placenta, fibroids located in the cervico-corporal border
  • Maternal disease ( diabetes mellitus, anemia, connective tissue disorders, uterine malformations).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Elkhouly NI, Abdelaal NK, Solyman AE, Elkelani OA, Elbasueny BF, Elhalaby AF. A new technique for uterine incision closure at the time of cesarean section: does it make a difference? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Apr;42(3):416-423. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1910636. Epub 2021 Jun 22.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
A computer-generated random numerical table (Randomization Generator Version 1.0) was used by our statistical department to prepare sealed opaque envelopes containing a group assignment. Three groups of envelopes-corresponding to the study groups were given to an anesthesia nurse. The nurse distributed envelopes to patients, alternating between groups during preanesthetic consultation. The patients were blinded the groups, and two authors performed the operations randomly. Another author who was blinded to the suturing technique performed all of the ultrasonographic examinations at 6 week follow up visit.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This trial enrolled 120 patients scheduled for primary cesarean delivery. Patients were randomized into either classical double layer uterine closure, purse string double layer uterine closure (Turan), or our new approach of uterine closure (double layer step up-step down technique). For short term comparison, transvaginal ultrasonography was planned for all patients 6 weeks after surgery
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2020

First Posted

December 23, 2020

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion

April 1, 2019

Study Completion

July 1, 2020

Last Updated

December 28, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-12