A New Technique for Uterine Incision Closure at The Time of Cesarean Section: Does it Make a Difference
1 other identifier
interventional
120
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the short term operative outcomes of three different surgical techniques for uterine incision closure during cesarean section (CS). This trial enrolled 120 patients scheduled for primary cesarean delivery. Patients were randomized into either classical double layer uterine closure, purse string double layer uterine closure (Turan), or our new approach of uterine closure (double layer step up-step down technique). For short term comparison, transvaginal ultrasonography was planned for all patients 6 weeks after surgery. Compared to group II and Group III, residual myometrial thickness was significantly thinner in group I (P\< 0.001). The number of patients with uterine niche was 10 (50% of all scar defects) in group I whereas it was 4 (20%) in group II and 6 (30%) in group III. Operative time was significantly longer in group II (P\< 0.001). This led to our conclusion that Turan technique and our new approach are associated with thicker myometrial thickness and less frequency of uterine scar defect than classical double layer uterine incision closure; however, our approach takes less operative time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 23, 2020
CompletedDecember 28, 2020
December 1, 2020
2.2 years
December 18, 2020
December 23, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
residual myometrial thickness
The cesarean scar site was identified as a small triangular anechoic defect in the anterior wall of the uterus (uterine niche). In these patients RMT was measured from the top of niche to serosal surface. In patients without a scar defect RMT was measured from the delineation of the endometrium to the serosal surface at the level of CS scar and total myometrial thickness was measured at the myometrium adjacent to CS scar in all patients
6 weeks after surgery
Study Arms (3)
Classical double layer closure
ACTIVE COMPARATORa holding Vicryl 1-0 was placed in the in the left corner to stabilize and define the demarcation of the suture line. A continuous unlocked stitch beginning at the right corner was used, closing the whole thickness of the uterine wall, including the decidual layer. The second unlocked stitch was performed by Vicryl 1-0 in a lateral -lateral (horizontal) position, adapting the first layer. Up to three additional single sutures were added for hemostasis if required.
Turan technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORbeginning in one corner, the incision is closed using Vicryl 1-0 stitch. The first layer is transversely passed through the inner myometrium-decidua line, and second layer is transversely passed through outer myometrium-visceral line continuously in the form of a purse string closure. With this technique, the original string is returned to the starting point and tied with a knot. Following the double layered purse-string closure, the aperture left in the middle of the uterine incision is closed with one separate figure of eight suture
Double layer step up-step down technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe incision is closed using Vicryl 1-0 stitch starting from one corner. The first layer is transversely passed through the inner myometrium-decidua line, and second layer is transversely passed through outer myometrium-visceral line continuously by alternating continuous stitches through the upper (step up) and the lower (step down) uterine flaps. The original string is returned to the starting point and tied with knot as in Turan technique. Following the double layered step up-step down closure, additional single sutures were added for hemostasis if required
Interventions
the incision is closed using Vicryl 1-0 stitch starting from one corner. The first layer is transversely passed through the inner myometrium-decidua line, and second layer is transversely passed through outer myometrium-visceral line continuously by alternating continuous stitches through the upper (step up) and the lower (step down) uterine flaps. The original string is returned to the starting point and tied with knot as in Turan technique. Following the double layered step up-step down closure, additional single sutures were added for hemostasis if required
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- pregnant women with a singleton prior cesarean section
- first-time cesarean delivery
- without preterm rupture of membranes, contractions or cervical dilatations
You may not qualify if:
- women under age of 18 years
- history of previous CS or any other uterine surgery
- placenta previa, abruptio placenta, fibroids located in the cervico-corporal border
- Maternal disease ( diabetes mellitus, anemia, connective tissue disorders, uterine malformations).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Elkhouly NI, Abdelaal NK, Solyman AE, Elkelani OA, Elbasueny BF, Elhalaby AF. A new technique for uterine incision closure at the time of cesarean section: does it make a difference? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Apr;42(3):416-423. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1910636. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
PMID: 34155957DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- A computer-generated random numerical table (Randomization Generator Version 1.0) was used by our statistical department to prepare sealed opaque envelopes containing a group assignment. Three groups of envelopes-corresponding to the study groups were given to an anesthesia nurse. The nurse distributed envelopes to patients, alternating between groups during preanesthetic consultation. The patients were blinded the groups, and two authors performed the operations randomly. Another author who was blinded to the suturing technique performed all of the ultrasonographic examinations at 6 week follow up visit.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2020
First Posted
December 23, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 1, 2019
Study Completion
July 1, 2020
Last Updated
December 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12