Closing Uterine Incision During C-section Using Barbed Suture (Stratafix) or Vicryl Suture.
1 other identifier
interventional
73
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A Randomized prospective single blinded trial. The investigator seek to evaluate the surgical outcome of Stratafix barbed suture compared to standart Vicryl sutures in reducing the suturing time during C-Section.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 19, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 21, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 24, 2017
CompletedMay 31, 2018
May 1, 2018
1.5 years
May 16, 2017
May 30, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time required for uterine closure.
Time measured in minutes and seconds
From the beginning of first uterine suture till the last suture ending uterine incision complete closure and any additional hemostatic sutures if applicable. The estimated period of time is 8 minutes (average).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Blood loss during uterine closure
Estimated period of time is 4 days.
Study Arms (2)
Stratafix suture
EXPERIMENTALVicryl suture
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant patients with an obstetrical indication for delivery by Cesarean section
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with blood clotting disorders.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Barzilai Medical Center
Ashkelon, Israel
Related Publications (2)
Greenberg JA, Goldman RH. Barbed suture: a review of the technology and clinical uses in obstetrics and gynecology. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2013;6(3-4):107-15.
PMID: 24920976BACKGROUNDGiampaolino P, De Rosa N, Tommaselli GA, Santangelo F, Nappi C, Sansone A, Bifulco G. Comparison of bidirectional barbed suture Stratafix and conventional suture with intracorporeal knots in laparoscopic myomectomy by office transvaginal hydrolaparoscopic follow-up: a preliminary report. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Dec;195:146-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
PMID: 26540594BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Gynecological Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2017
First Posted
May 19, 2017
Study Start
June 29, 2016
Primary Completion
December 21, 2017
Study Completion
December 24, 2017
Last Updated
May 31, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05