Individual Differences in Placebo Analgesic Effects
Person by Situation Interaction: Matching Suggestions to Participants' Motivational Styles
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study examines the effects of placebo suggestions tailored to match or mismatch individual participants' motivational styles-an issue of person-situation 'fit' with important effects in public health settings, but which has been ignored in past research.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy
Started Sep 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
December 9, 2025
December 1, 2025
1.3 years
November 16, 2020
December 2, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Changes in subjective ratings of acute thermal pain
Following each thermal stimulus, participants are asked to rate how painful it was, on a semi-circular computerized scale. Ratings are based on the angle (0-180), with higher angle representing higher pain ratings. We will average and compare the pain ratings within participant across interventions.
Measured repeatedly, immediately after thermal stimuli on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
Changes in subjective ratings of pain expectations
Before each thermal stimulus, participants are asked to rate how painful they expect the next stimulus to be, on a semi-circular computerized scale. Ratings are based on the angle (0-180), with higher angle representing higher expectations ratings. We will average and compare the expectation ratings within participant across interventions.
Measured repeatedly, immediately before thermal stimuli on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Facial expressions
Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
Thermal imaging of the face
Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
Changes in skin conductance response measured with a Biopac device
Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
Changes in heart rate measured with a Biopac device
Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
EXPERIMENTALAll participants will participate in two sessions, one with a placebo suggestion that matches the participant's motivational style, and one with placebo suggestion that does not match their motivational style, in a pseudo-random order.
Control
EXPERIMENTALEach session will also include a control phase, in which the same cream will be applied, and participants will be instructed that the cream has no analgesic effects.
Interventions
In a control condition, with the same cream as in the placebo interventions, participants will be instructed that the cream is a control cream with no effects.
Over-the-counter hand cream will be applied to participants' skin, but they will be told that they are given a highly efficient topical analgesic cream. The suggestion will be based on a "promotion" approach (promoting good feelings).
Over-the-counter hand cream will be applied to participants' skin, but they will be told that they are given a highly efficient topical analgesic cream. The suggestion will be based on a "prevention" approach (preventing pain).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy participants
- Dominant promotion focus or dominant prevention focus (based on our screening)
You may not qualify if:
- Currently or recently suffered from chronic pain (based on screening)
- Cannot tolerate heat pain applied to the forearm, based on a calibration task at the beginning of the experiment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dartmouth College
Hanover, New Hampshire, 03755, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tor D Wager, PhD
Dartmouth College
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants will not be aware of the type of suggestion (or the fact there are different types of suggestions) during the experiment. They will be debriefed upon the study's conclusion.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2020
First Posted
December 16, 2020
Study Start (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
December 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- All data will be de-identified prior to sharing. Raw data will be submitted to NDA within one year from the end of data collection or 6 months from the acceptance date of the first primary study manuscript on the full dataset (excluding methods development papers), whichever is later. Analyzed data/maps of statistical results and models accompanying each paper will be submitted to NDA/OpenFMRI when the primary study manuscript is accepted.
- Access Criteria
- These data would generally be made available to any qualified investigator for neuroimaging studies only including: i. Research on any brain phenomenon; ii. Neuroimaging research on non-disease traits (intelligence, behavioral traits); iii. Methods development research. The requesting investigator must provide documentation of local IRB approval. These data would not be made available to: i. Any criminal justice organization, because data may not be used for any criminal justice applications; ii. Any commercial entity, because use of the data is limited to not-for-profit organizations and data may not be used for any commercial purposes.
All de-identified data will be publicly shared via public online platforms such as the Open Science Framework (OSF) and Github, and the NIMH Data Archive (NDA), according to the terms and conditions outlined on their website (https://ndar.nih.gov/contribute\_data\_sharing\_regimen.html). Identifying information will not be released, including the facial videos, of which only non-identifiable features will be extracted and shared.