NCT04669093

Brief Summary

This study examines the effects of placebo suggestions tailored to match or mismatch individual participants' motivational styles-an issue of person-situation 'fit' with important effects in public health settings, but which has been ignored in past research.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy

Timeline
15mo left

Started Sep 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable healthy

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 16, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 16, 2020

Completed
5.8 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 30, 2026

Expected
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2027

Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

December 9, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

November 16, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 2, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Changes in subjective ratings of acute thermal pain

    Following each thermal stimulus, participants are asked to rate how painful it was, on a semi-circular computerized scale. Ratings are based on the angle (0-180), with higher angle representing higher pain ratings. We will average and compare the pain ratings within participant across interventions.

    Measured repeatedly, immediately after thermal stimuli on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.

  • Changes in subjective ratings of pain expectations

    Before each thermal stimulus, participants are asked to rate how painful they expect the next stimulus to be, on a semi-circular computerized scale. Ratings are based on the angle (0-180), with higher angle representing higher expectations ratings. We will average and compare the expectation ratings within participant across interventions.

    Measured repeatedly, immediately before thermal stimuli on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Facial expressions

    Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.

  • Thermal imaging of the face

    Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.

  • Changes in skin conductance response measured with a Biopac device

    Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.

  • Changes in heart rate measured with a Biopac device

    Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.

Study Arms (2)

Placebo

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants will participate in two sessions, one with a placebo suggestion that matches the participant's motivational style, and one with placebo suggestion that does not match their motivational style, in a pseudo-random order.

Behavioral: Placebo cream- "promotion" suggestionBehavioral: Placebo cream- "prevention" suggestion

Control

EXPERIMENTAL

Each session will also include a control phase, in which the same cream will be applied, and participants will be instructed that the cream has no analgesic effects.

Behavioral: Control cream

Interventions

Control creamBEHAVIORAL

In a control condition, with the same cream as in the placebo interventions, participants will be instructed that the cream is a control cream with no effects.

Control

Over-the-counter hand cream will be applied to participants' skin, but they will be told that they are given a highly efficient topical analgesic cream. The suggestion will be based on a "promotion" approach (promoting good feelings).

Placebo

Over-the-counter hand cream will be applied to participants' skin, but they will be told that they are given a highly efficient topical analgesic cream. The suggestion will be based on a "prevention" approach (preventing pain).

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy participants
  • Dominant promotion focus or dominant prevention focus (based on our screening)

You may not qualify if:

  • Currently or recently suffered from chronic pain (based on screening)
  • Cannot tolerate heat pain applied to the forearm, based on a calibration task at the beginning of the experiment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dartmouth College

Hanover, New Hampshire, 03755, United States

Location

Study Officials

  • Tor D Wager, PhD

    Dartmouth College

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants will not be aware of the type of suggestion (or the fact there are different types of suggestions) during the experiment. They will be debriefed upon the study's conclusion.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: This is a within-participant design. Each participant will participate in two sessions. In both sessions, an over-the-counter hand cream will be applied to their skin, accompanied by a placebo suggestion that the cream is analgesic. In one session, the suggestion will match the participant's motivational style, and in the other session the suggestion will not match their motivational style. The order of sessions will be counterbalanced across participants. Each session will also include a control condition, in which participants will be told that the cream has no affect. The same over-the-counter hand cream will be used in all sessions.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2020

First Posted

December 16, 2020

Study Start (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

December 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All de-identified data will be publicly shared via public online platforms such as the Open Science Framework (OSF) and Github, and the NIMH Data Archive (NDA), according to the terms and conditions outlined on their website (https://ndar.nih.gov/contribute\_data\_sharing\_regimen.html). Identifying information will not be released, including the facial videos, of which only non-identifiable features will be extracted and shared.

Time Frame
All data will be de-identified prior to sharing. Raw data will be submitted to NDA within one year from the end of data collection or 6 months from the acceptance date of the first primary study manuscript on the full dataset (excluding methods development papers), whichever is later. Analyzed data/maps of statistical results and models accompanying each paper will be submitted to NDA/OpenFMRI when the primary study manuscript is accepted.
Access Criteria
These data would generally be made available to any qualified investigator for neuroimaging studies only including: i. Research on any brain phenomenon; ii. Neuroimaging research on non-disease traits (intelligence, behavioral traits); iii. Methods development research. The requesting investigator must provide documentation of local IRB approval. These data would not be made available to: i. Any criminal justice organization, because data may not be used for any criminal justice applications; ii. Any commercial entity, because use of the data is limited to not-for-profit organizations and data may not be used for any commercial purposes.

Locations