MoveStrong at Home: A Feasibility Study of a Model for Remote Delivery of Functional Strength and Balance Training Combined With Nutrition Education for Older Pre-frail Adults.
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sufficient muscle strength helps to get out of a chair and can prevent falls. Up to 30% of older adults experience age-related loss of muscle strength, which can lead to frailty and health instability. Exercise helps to build muscle, maintain bone density and prevent chronic disease, especially during the aging process. However, more than 75% of Canadian adults ≥18 years of age are not meeting physical activity guidelines. In addition, it is known that malnutrition, including low protein intake, may lead to poor physical function. While there are services to support exercise and nutrition, barriers to implementing them persist. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the potential for physical inactivity, malnutrition, and loneliness among older adults, especially those with pre-existing health or mobility impairments. Now and in future, alternate ways to promote exercise and proper nutrition to the most vulnerable are needed. The investigators propose to adapt MoveStrong, an 8-week education program combining functional and balance training with strategies to increase protein intake. The program was co-developed with patient advocates, Osteoporosis Canada, the YMCA, Community Support Connections and others. MoveStrong was delivered by telephone or web conference to older adults in their homes, using mailed program instructions, 1-on-1 training sessions through Physitrack®, as well as online nutrition Q\&A sessions and group discussion sessions over Microsoft® Teams. The primary aim of this study was to assess feasibility and acceptability of a remote model as determined by recruitment (≥ 25 people in 3 months), retention (≥80%), adherence of (70%) and participant experience.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 9, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 12, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 13, 2024
CompletedMay 13, 2024
November 1, 2023
6 months
October 8, 2020
May 4, 2022
November 30, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Recruitment
The number of participants recruited \>25.
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
Retention
Feasibility threshold: The number of participants retained at follow-up \>80%.
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
Average Adherence to Nutrition Sessions
Participants were encouraged to attend 3 nutrition sessions that took place on weeks 2, 4 and 6 of the intervention (12 weeks). Feasibility threshold: "Attendance" or the average proportion of nutrition sessions \>67% or \>2/3 sessions.
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
Average Adherence to Exercise Sessions
Participants were encouraged to complete at least 3 exercise sessions per week (one supervised and two independent) for the duration of the intervention (12 weeks). Feasibility threshold: "Attendance" or the average proportion of exercise sessions completed \>70% or 25.3/36 sessions.
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Physical Activity
Baseline, week 9, week 12
Exercise Self-efficacy Scale
Baseline, week 9, week 12
30-second Chair Stand
Baseline, week 9, week 12
Static Balance
Baseline, week 9, week 12
Fatigue
Baseline, week 9, week 12
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Single Arm
EXPERIMENTALThis was the only arm in the study. All participants were allocated to this arm, where they received an 8-week remotely-delivered exercise and nutrition program.
Interventions
Participants received two 1-on-1 exercise sessions per week to start. Each session lasted 30 minutes. As progress was made, participants were encouraged to exercise independently outside the structured sessions while continuing to receive a 1-on-1 session each week. The individualized exercises were aligned with functional movements to promote personal relevance: balance, pull, squat, push, hinge, lift \& carry and calf raise.
Participants received a nutrition education booklet and had access to five online videos that correspond to key topics in the booklet (reading nutrition labels, types of protein, foods containing protein, incorporating protein into meals, spreading protein in meals throughout the day). Participants attended three 60-minute nutrition Q\&A sessions led by a dietitian, where the group reviewed content from the booklet and videos, and discussed personalized strategies to increase protein intake.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has at least one of the following chronic conditions: arthritis, cancer (other than minor skin cancer), cardiovascular disease, chronic lung disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, kidney disease, obesity, osteoporosis, stroke
- Scored ≥ 1 point on the FRAIL Scale
- Able to give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Current or recent (within the past 6 months)participation in progressive resistance training program ≥ 2 times per week
- Receiving palliative care
- Unable to perform basic activities of daily living or follow 2-step commands (moderate-severe cognitive impairment)
- Upcoming travel plans (travelling\> 1 week during the program)
- Absolute exercise contraindications (ACSM guidelines)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Canada
Related Publications (14)
Greenwood JL, Joy EA, Stanford JB. The Physical Activity Vital Sign: a primary care tool to guide counseling for obesity. J Phys Act Health. 2010 Sep;7(5):571-6. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.5.571.
PMID: 20864751BACKGROUNDResnick B, Jenkins LS. Testing the reliability and validity of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise scale. Nurs Res. 2000 May-Jun;49(3):154-9. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200005000-00007.
PMID: 10882320BACKGROUNDMcAuley E, Mailey EL, Mullen SP, Szabo AN, Wojcicki TR, White SM, Gothe N, Olson EA, Kramer AF. Growth trajectories of exercise self-efficacy in older adults: influence of measures and initial status. Health Psychol. 2011 Jan;30(1):75-83. doi: 10.1037/a0021567.
PMID: 21038962BACKGROUNDBohannon RW. Sit-to-stand test for measuring performance of lower extremity muscles. Percept Mot Skills. 1995 Feb;80(1):163-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.1995.80.1.163.
PMID: 7624188BACKGROUNDJones CJ, Rikli RE, Beam WC. A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999 Jun;70(2):113-9. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1999.10608028.
PMID: 10380242BACKGROUNDGuralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M85-94. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85.
PMID: 8126356BACKGROUNDTennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, Parkinson J, Secker J, Stewart-Brown S. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63.
PMID: 18042300BACKGROUNDHerdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
PMID: 21479777BACKGROUNDKeller HH, Goy R, Kane SL. Validity and reliability of SCREEN II (Seniors in the community: risk evaluation for eating and nutrition, Version II). Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Oct;59(10):1149-57. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602225.
PMID: 16015256BACKGROUNDSubar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Mittl B, Zimmerman TP, Thompson FE, Bingley C, Willis G, Islam NG, Baranowski T, McNutt S, Potischman N. The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24): a resource for researchers, clinicians, and educators from the National Cancer Institute. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Aug;112(8):1134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.04.016. Epub 2012 Jun 15. No abstract available.
PMID: 22704899BACKGROUNDClark RE, Milligan J, Ashe MC, Faulkner G, Canfield C, Funnell L, Brien S, Butt DA, Mehan U, Samson K, Papaioannou A, Giangregorio L. A patient-oriented approach to the development of a primary care physical activity screen for embedding into electronic medical records. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021 Jun;46(6):589-596. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0356. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
PMID: 33226847BACKGROUNDRadloff, LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied psychological measurement,1977; 1(3), 385-401.
BACKGROUNDXie F, Pullenayegum E, Gaebel K, Bansback N, Bryan S, Ohinmaa A, Poissant L, Johnson JA; Canadian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study Group. A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada. Med Care. 2016 Jan;54(1):98-105. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000447.
PMID: 26492214BACKGROUNDWang E, Keller H, Mourtzakis M, Rodrigues IB, Steinke A, Ashe MC, Thabane L, Brien S, Funnell L, Cheung AM, Milligan J, Papaioannou A, Weston ZJ, Straus S, Giangregorio L. MoveStrong at home: a feasibility study of a model for remote delivery of functional strength and balance training combined with nutrition education for older pre-frail and frail adults. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2022 Dec 1;47(12):1172-1186. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2022-0195. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
PMID: 36108334RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ellen Wang
- Organization
- UBC/Arthritis Research Canada
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lora Giangregorio, PhD
University of Waterloo
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2020
First Posted
December 11, 2020
Study Start
October 5, 2020
Primary Completion
April 9, 2021
Study Completion
October 12, 2021
Last Updated
May 13, 2024
Results First Posted
May 13, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share