Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided Versus Radioguided Medial Lumbar Bundle Branch Block
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
3
Brief Summary
In adults with chronic low back pain, the investigators will compare the effectiveness of the medial bundle branch block on three lumbar levels (L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1) performed either by radiographic guidance or by ultrasound approach according to a transverse approach. The objective of this study will be to evaluate the benefit of these both procedures on pain, on the practice of daily activities and the incidence of adverse events in order to show whether the two modalities are equivalent.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 6, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 10, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 10, 2022
CompletedMarch 22, 2022
March 1, 2022
1.2 years
December 2, 2020
March 21, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score from baseline to 1 month after infiltration. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) will be calculated before and 1 month after procedure. This index (range 0 to 100) is used by clinicians and researchers to quantify disability for low back pain, with higher score indicating greater disability.
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score
1 week
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score from baseline to 1 week after infiltration
1 week
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score from baseline to 1 month after infiltration
1 month
Change in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) from baseline to 1 week after infiltration
1 week
Change in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) from baseline to 1 month after infiltration
1 month
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ultrasound-guided infiltration
EXPERIMENTALThe patient is positioned in the prone position with a block under his stomach. After disinfection of the lumbosacral region with alcoholic chlorhexidine 0.5%, the investigators position the convex probe of the ultrasound machine in the transverse plane. Once the spine has been located, the investigators look for the spinous processes of the lower lumbar vertebrae L4 and L5 with the mark on the cranial side and the side opposite the mark on the side of the sacrum. The latter is visualized as a continuous hyperechoic line. Then, the probe is tilted 90 ° to be in a transverse plane. A 22G needle is introduced in a transverse axis starting from the laterality by inserting it in the direction of the median bone contacts of the lower lumbar vertebrae L3, L4 and L5. An infiltration will be unilaterally performed at three levels (L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels).
Fluoroscopy-guided infiltration
EXPERIMENTALThe patient is positioned in the prone position with a block under his stomach. The lumbosacral region is disinfected with alcoholic chlorhexidine 0.5%. The C-shaped arm of a X-ray fluoroscopy is positioned around the patient in an antero-posterior view tilted ¾ in order to free the classic view called "scotty dogs ". The puncture point is determined by the positioning of the needle in so-called "tunnel vision". The needle is thus brought to the bone contact corresponding to the eye of the scotty dog in tunnel vision, an area corresponding to the passage of the lumbar median branch. An infiltration will be unilaterally performed at three levels (L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels).
Interventions
In the patient in prone position, an infiltration guided by ultrasound will be performed in three puncture points (L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels unilaterally). At each level, 1mL of a mixture consisting of 3mL of Linisol 2% (60mg of lidocaine) and 1mL of Depomedrol 40mg / Lidocaine 10mg is injected.
In the patient in prone position, an infiltration guided by fluoroscopy will be performed in three puncture points (L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels unilaterally). At each level, 1mL of a mixture consisting of 3mL of Linisol 2% (60mg of lidocaine) and 1mL of Depomedrol 40mg / Lidocaine 10mg is injected.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Chronic Low-back pain for at least 3 months, without response to a conservative treatment of minimum 4 weeks
- No signs of dissociated pain, radiculitis, neurological diseases (including stroke, Parkinson's disease), spinal instability or deformities (such as scoliosis, ankylosing spondylitis), history of lumbar surgery , fracture or lumbar tumor.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Allergy to injected products (Depomedrol or Linisol)
- Psychiatric disorders hindering understanding of the protocol
- Local or systemic infection
- Coagulation disorder
- Obese with a BMI\> 35 kg / m²
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierrelead
- Hôpital de Braine-l'Alleudcollaborator
- Erasme University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Hôpital de Braine l'Alleud Waterloo
Braine-l'Alleud, 1420, Belgium
CHU Saint-Pierre
Brussels, 1000, Belgium
Hôpital Erasme
Brussels, 1070, Belgium
Related Publications (12)
Han SH, Park KD, Cho KR, Park Y. Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided medial branch block for the treatment of lower lumbar facet joint pain: A retrospective comparative study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr;96(16):e6655. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006655.
PMID: 28422871BACKGROUNDWon HS, Yang M, Kim YD. Facet joint injections for management of low back pain: a clinically focused review. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2020 Jan 31;15(1):8-18. doi: 10.17085/apm.2020.15.1.8.
PMID: 33329784BACKGROUNDManchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, Cash KA, Pampati V. Lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic facet joint pain: one-year follow-up of a randomized, double-blind controlled trial: Clinical Trial NCT00355914. Pain Physician. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):121-32.
PMID: 18354721BACKGROUNDKarkucak M, Batmaz I, Kerimoglu S, Ayar A. Comparison of clinical outcomes of ultrasonography-guided and blind local injections in facet syndrome: A 6-week randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2020;33(3):431-436. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181447.
PMID: 31524141BACKGROUNDHurdle MF. Ultrasound-Guided Spinal Procedures for Pain: A Review. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2016 Aug;27(3):673-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2016.04.011.
PMID: 27468672BACKGROUNDHa DH, Shim DM, Kim TK, Kim YM, Choi SS. Comparison of ultrasonography- and fluoroscopy-guided facet joint block in the lumbar spine. Asian Spine J. 2010 Jun;4(1):15-22. doi: 10.4184/asj.2010.4.1.15. Epub 2010 Apr 26.
PMID: 20622950BACKGROUNDKastler A, Kogl N, Gruber H, Skalla E, Loizides A. Lumbar medial branch cryoneurolysis under ultrasound guidance: initial report of five cases. Med Ultrason. 2020 Sep 5;22(3):293-298. doi: 10.11152/mu-2529.
PMID: 32898203BACKGROUNDYe L, Wen C, Liu H. Ultrasound-guided versus low dose computed tomography scanning guidance for lumbar facet joint injections: same accuracy and efficiency. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Nov 7;18(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0620-7.
PMID: 30404599BACKGROUNDKaye AD, Motejunas MW, Bonneval LA, Ehrhardt KP, Latimer DR, Trescot A, Wilson KE, Ibrahim IN, Cornett EM, Urman RD, Candido KD. Ultrasound practice for chronic pain procedures: A comprehensive review. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Dec;33(4):465-486. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
PMID: 31791564BACKGROUNDYun DH, Kim HS, Yoo SD, Kim DH, Chon JM, Choi SH, Hwang DG, Jung PK. Efficacy of ultrasonography-guided injections in patients with facet syndrome of the low lumbar spine. Ann Rehabil Med. 2012 Feb;36(1):66-71. doi: 10.5535/arm.2012.36.1.66. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
PMID: 22506237BACKGROUNDBoswell MV, Colson JD, Sehgal N, Dunbar EE, Epter R. A systematic review of therapeutic facet joint interventions in chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2007 Jan;10(1):229-53.
PMID: 17256032BACKGROUNDGreher M, Kirchmair L, Enna B, Kovacs P, Gustorff B, Kapral S, Moriggl B. Ultrasound-guided lumbar facet nerve block: accuracy of a new technique confirmed by computed tomography. Anesthesiology. 2004 Nov;101(5):1195-200. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200411000-00020.
PMID: 15505456BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Turgay Tuna, MD,PhD
Erasme University Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marie-Laure Nisolle, MD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
- STUDY CHAIR
Panayota Kapessidou, MD,PhD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2020
First Posted
December 9, 2020
Study Start
January 6, 2021
Primary Completion
March 10, 2022
Study Completion
March 10, 2022
Last Updated
March 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share