TENS Reduces Movement-Evoked Pain in People With CLBP
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Reduces Movement-Evoked Pain in People With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomised Crossover Study
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this cross-over study 25 patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) were tested for pain relief in 2 conditions: while using the Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) application and without using it. Primary outcome: Movement-Evoked Pain (MEP). This was measured using the Back Performance Scale (BPS) and a 5-minute walk test (5MWT). Participants performed 5 functional tasks and were asked to rate their pain before, during, and after each movement on a numeric rating score scale. The same principle will be used for the 5MWT: for each walking-minute, 3 pain measurements will be assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2019
CompletedFebruary 3, 2021
February 1, 2021
1 month
September 5, 2019
February 2, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Movement Evoked Pain
Pain that is experienced in response to 2 physical tasks: the Back Performance Scale and the 5 minutes walk test. Participants performed 5 physical tasks (= 1) grasping toes with fingertips in a sitting position; 2) forward bending from standing; 3) picking up paper from standing; 4) long-sitting from supine and 5) lifting a 5kg box from floor to table) and walked for 5 minutes. Participants provided a pain rating on a 11 points Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) with the endpoints no pain" (0) and "excruciating pain" (10). Pain will be assessed during the physical tasks (=at the same moment).
Change in pain score between (1) Movement Evoked Pain measures assessed without TENS application and (2) Movement-Evoked Pain measured assessed while using TENS application. Between both measures, a wash out period of 30 minutes was introduced.
Study Arms (2)
Movement-Evoked Pain during TENS treatment
EXPERIMENTALParticipants performed several physical tasks while using the HeatTens device (HV-F311-E). During these tasks, participants needed to rate their pain.
Movement-Evoked Pain
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants performed several physical tasks during with their pain was assessed.
Interventions
(1) 2\~108 Hertz (modulation program inside); (2) 100 microseconds (pulse duration)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- chronic nonspecific LBP for at least 3 months' duration: non-specific LBP implies that patients are not allowed to have any evidence of specific spinal pathology (e.g., hernia, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, infection, spinal fracture or malignancy).
You may not qualify if:
- spinal surgery in the past 6 months
- severe underlying comorbidity (like diagnosed diabetes, cardiovascular problems, etc.),
- pregnant or given birth in the preceding year,
- having initiated a new LBP treatment in the 6 weeks prior to study participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Brussels, Jette, 1090, Belgium
Related Publications (1)
Srikandarajah S, Gilron I. Systematic review of movement-evoked pain versus pain at rest in postsurgical clinical trials and meta-analyses: a fundamental distinction requiring standardized measurement. Pain. 2011 Aug;152(8):1734-1739. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Mar 12.
PMID: 21402445BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lynn Leemans
Dra. Lynn Leemans
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2019
First Posted
September 16, 2019
Study Start
October 1, 2019
Primary Completion
November 1, 2019
Study Completion
November 1, 2019
Last Updated
February 3, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to make IPD available.