NCT04658446

Brief Summary

Comparing two indirect bonding techniques. Augmented Reality-assisted bonding and Digital 3D printed indirect bonding trays in regards to patient convenience, accuracy of bracket placement and time consumption of each technique used.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
8

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 1, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 8, 2020

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 25, 2024

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2024

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 25, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

September 6, 2023

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3 days

First QC Date

December 1, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 4, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Augmented RealityIndirect BondingDigital OrthodonticsOrthodontic bracket

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient Convenience

    Whether the patient was at ease during the bonding procedure or not and the overall convenience of the procedure from the patient's point of view.

    Immediately after the bonding procedure.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Accuracy of the Method

    After one week of the Bonding Procedure.

  • Time

    At the time of the Bonding Procedure.

Study Arms (2)

Augmented Reality-Assisted Bonding

EXPERIMENTAL

The quadrant of the upper arch that shall use the AR-assisted bonding method. From the maxillary central incisor to the maxillary first permanent molar of the same quadrant.

Device: Augmented Reality-Assisted Indirect Bonding

Digitally-Asssited Indirect Bonding

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The quadrant of the upper arch that shall use the digitally-assisted bonding method utilizing a 3D printed tray. From the maxillary central incisor to the maxillary first permanent molar of the same quadrant.

Device: Digitally-Asssited Indirect Bonding

Interventions

Virtual Orthodontic attachments are overlaid on top of the patient's teeth using an augmented-reality headset to guide the bracket positioning procedure.

Augmented Reality-Assisted Bonding

3D printed models with precise brackets positioned as virtually pre-planned. To aid in the transfer of the planned bracket positions to the patient's physical teeth.

Also known as: 3D Printed Indirect Bonding Guides
Digitally-Asssited Indirect Bonding

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years - 30 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Arch length deficiency ≤ 5 mm.
  • Good oral hygiene.
  • Fully erupted permanent dentition, not necessarily including third molars.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient with active periodontal diseases.
  • Anterior cross-bite.
  • Enamel hypoplasia.
  • Previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Teeth with caries or restorations on labial surfaces.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Castilla AE, Crowe JJ, Moses JR, Wang M, Ferracane JL, Covell DA Jr. Measurement and comparison of bracket transfer accuracy of five indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod. 2014 Jul;84(4):607-14. doi: 10.2319/070113-484.1. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

  • El-Timamy AM, El-Sharaby FA, Eid FH, Mostafa YA. Three-dimensional imaging for indirect-direct bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jun;149(6):928-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.12.009.

  • Kwon HB, Park YS, Han JS. Augmented reality in dentistry: a current perspective. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018 Oct;76(7):497-503. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1441437. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The assessor shall not know which group is which in the accuracy outcome.
Purpose
DEVICE FEASIBILITY
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 8 Patients with Split-mouth trial design. Full permanent dentition. In need of Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance therapy.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD Candidate/ Researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2020

First Posted

December 8, 2020

Study Start

February 25, 2024

Primary Completion

February 28, 2024

Study Completion

March 25, 2024

Last Updated

September 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share