Augmented Reality-Assisted Bonding Versus Digitally-Assisted Indirect Bonding in Orthodontic Patients
Comparison Between Augmented Reality-Assisted Bonding Versus Digitally-Assisted Indirect Bonding in Orthodontic Patients (Randomized Clinical Trial)
1 other identifier
interventional
8
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Comparing two indirect bonding techniques. Augmented Reality-assisted bonding and Digital 3D printed indirect bonding trays in regards to patient convenience, accuracy of bracket placement and time consumption of each technique used.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 25, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 25, 2024
CompletedSeptember 6, 2023
September 1, 2023
3 days
December 1, 2020
September 4, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient Convenience
Whether the patient was at ease during the bonding procedure or not and the overall convenience of the procedure from the patient's point of view.
Immediately after the bonding procedure.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Accuracy of the Method
After one week of the Bonding Procedure.
Time
At the time of the Bonding Procedure.
Study Arms (2)
Augmented Reality-Assisted Bonding
EXPERIMENTALThe quadrant of the upper arch that shall use the AR-assisted bonding method. From the maxillary central incisor to the maxillary first permanent molar of the same quadrant.
Digitally-Asssited Indirect Bonding
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe quadrant of the upper arch that shall use the digitally-assisted bonding method utilizing a 3D printed tray. From the maxillary central incisor to the maxillary first permanent molar of the same quadrant.
Interventions
Virtual Orthodontic attachments are overlaid on top of the patient's teeth using an augmented-reality headset to guide the bracket positioning procedure.
3D printed models with precise brackets positioned as virtually pre-planned. To aid in the transfer of the planned bracket positions to the patient's physical teeth.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Arch length deficiency ≤ 5 mm.
- Good oral hygiene.
- Fully erupted permanent dentition, not necessarily including third molars.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with active periodontal diseases.
- Anterior cross-bite.
- Enamel hypoplasia.
- Previous orthodontic treatment.
- Teeth with caries or restorations on labial surfaces.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Castilla AE, Crowe JJ, Moses JR, Wang M, Ferracane JL, Covell DA Jr. Measurement and comparison of bracket transfer accuracy of five indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod. 2014 Jul;84(4):607-14. doi: 10.2319/070113-484.1. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
PMID: 24555689RESULTEl-Timamy AM, El-Sharaby FA, Eid FH, Mostafa YA. Three-dimensional imaging for indirect-direct bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jun;149(6):928-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.12.009.
PMID: 27242004RESULTKwon HB, Park YS, Han JS. Augmented reality in dentistry: a current perspective. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018 Oct;76(7):497-503. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1441437. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
PMID: 29465283RESULT
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The assessor shall not know which group is which in the accuracy outcome.
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD Candidate/ Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2020
First Posted
December 8, 2020
Study Start
February 25, 2024
Primary Completion
February 28, 2024
Study Completion
March 25, 2024
Last Updated
September 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share