NCT04656405

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new online real-time quality measurement and feedback video-based CPR training program. The study participants will be allocated to three different CPR training programs: online real-time quality measurement and feedback video-based CPR training program, online real-time feedback video-based CPR training without quality measurement program, and conventional CPR training program. After CPR training, each participant will perform a 6 minute CPR simulation test. The investigators will compare the quality of chest compression between the three study groups. The investigators hypothesize that the new online real-time quality measurement and feedback video-based CPR training program is non-inferior to the preexisting conventional CPR training program and is superior to online real-time feedback video-based CPR training without quality measurement.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
180

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 30, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 7, 2020

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 11, 2020

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 18, 2021

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

November 30, 2020

Last Update Submit

May 15, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationEducationOut-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Chest compression depth

    Depth of chest compressions measured in millimeters

    Assessed during 6 minute CPR simulation test

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Chest compression rate

    Assessed during 6 minute CPR simulation test

  • Hand position

    Assessed during 6 minute CPR simulation test

  • No flow time

    Assessed during 6 minute CPR simulation test

  • Time to chest compression

    Assessed during 6 minute CPR simulation test

Study Arms (3)

Online real-time CPR training program

EXPERIMENTAL

Online real-time quality measurement and feedback video-based CPR training will be provided to participants

Other: Online real-time quality measurement and feedback video-based CPR training

Online real-time CPR training without quality measurement program

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Online real-time feedback video-based CPR training without quality measurement will be provided to participants

Other: Online real-time feedback video-based CPR training without quality measurement

Conventional CPR training program

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Conventional CPR training will be provided to participants

Other: Conventional CPR training

Interventions

Participants in the online real-time quality measurement and feedback video-based CPR training program group will access an online training center with laptop computers provided by the researcher. All education and communication is conducted online. The study instructors shows the study participants an edited version of the CPR training video used in the conventional CPR training program. A Little Anne QCPR mannequin (Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway) and SkillGuide (Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway) are provided so that the participants can use while watching the video and during the following hands-on practice session. After watching the video, hands-on practice will be conducted by the instructor on-line. The instructor will watch each individual participants CPR performance via video conferencing and collect real-time performance data using the QCPR mannequin device. Using this information, the instructor will provide real-time online feedback to participants.

Online real-time CPR training program

Participants in the online real-time feedback video-based CPR training without quality measurement program group will access an online training center with laptop computers provided by the researcher. All education and communication is conducted online. When study participants access the online training center, study instructors shows the study participants an edited version of the CPR training video used in the conventional CPR training program. A Little Anne QCPR mannequin (Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway) is provided so that the participants can use while watching the video and during the following hands-on practice session. After watching the video, hands-on practice will be conducted by the instructor on-line. The instructor will watch each individual participants CPR performance via video conferencing. The instructor will provide real-time online feedback to participants.

Online real-time CPR training without quality measurement program

Participants in the conventional CPR training program group will be provided CPR education with the "Home Education and Resuscitation Outcome Study (HEROS)" program that is currently provided in Seoul, Korea. The HEROS program is a 1-hour training course, consisting of a 30-minute video-based self-instruction training with a mannequin. The program also includes a bystander CPR simulation with a simulated dispatcher using the participants own cell phone. Little Anne QCPR mannequin (Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway) and SkillGuide (Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway) device are provided to measure and give feedback on the participants CPR performance.

Conventional CPR training program

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Volunteers aged 18 years or older

You may not qualify if:

  • Healthcare providers
  • Participants with chronic lung diseases
  • Participants with cardiovascular diseases
  • Participants with visual disabilities
  • Participants with hearing disabilities
  • Participants with musculoskeletal disabilities

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Borame Medical Center

Seoul, 07061, South Korea

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Kim TH, Lee YJ, Lee EJ, Ro YS, Lee K, Lee H, Jang DB, Song KJ, Shin SD, Myklebust H, Birkenes TS. Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality Between Standard Versus Telephone-Basic Life Support Training Program in Middle-Aged and Elderly Housewives: A Randomized Simulation Study. Simul Healthc. 2018 Feb;13(1):27-32. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000286.

    PMID: 29369963BACKGROUND
  • Park GJ, Kong SYJ, Song KJ, Shin SD, Kim TH, Ro YS, Myklebust H, Birkenes TS. The Effectiveness of a New Dispatcher-Assisted Basic Life Support Training Program on Quality in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performance During Training and Willingness to Perform Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Study. Simul Healthc. 2020 Oct;15(5):318-325. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000435.

    PMID: 32604135BACKGROUND
  • Cheng A, Nadkarni VM, Mancini MB, Hunt EA, Sinz EH, Merchant RM, Donoghue A, Duff JP, Eppich W, Auerbach M, Bigham BL, Blewer AL, Chan PS, Bhanji F; American Heart Association Education Science Investigators; and on behalf of the American Heart Association Education Science and Programs Committee, Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Resuscitation Education Science: Educational Strategies to Improve Outcomes From Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018 Aug 7;138(6):e82-e122. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000583.

    PMID: 29930020BACKGROUND
  • Baldi E, Cornara S, Contri E, Epis F, Fina D, Zelaschi B, Dossena C, Fichtner F, Tonani M, Di Maggio M, Zambaiti E, Somaschini A. Real-time visual feedback during training improves laypersons' CPR quality: a randomized controlled manikin study. CJEM. 2017 Nov;19(6):480-487. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.410. Epub 2017 Jan 24.

    PMID: 28115027BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart ArrestHeart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • TAE HAN KIM, MD

    SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center

    STUDY CHAIR
  • STEPHEN GW LEE, MD

    Seoul National University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2020

First Posted

December 7, 2020

Study Start

December 11, 2020

Primary Completion

December 30, 2021

Study Completion

March 31, 2022

Last Updated

May 18, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations