Optimizing Integration of CPR Feedback Technology With CPR Coaching for Cardiac Arrest
1 other identifier
interventional
180
2 countries
5
Brief Summary
There is significant data showing that the quality of CPR performed is quite poor. Recent studies have shown that when real-time visual corrective feedback is available to CPR providers, quality (compression depth and rate) improves. Pilot work at John's Hopkins Children's Hospital indicates that providing a CPR Coach whose role it is to provide real-time coaching during cardiac arrest, further improves the quality of CPR. This study will assess the impact of a CPR Coach for improving CPR quality and CPR perception in a team of healthcare providers during simulated CPA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2019
CompletedJune 29, 2017
June 1, 2017
1.3 years
April 25, 2017
June 28, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
CPR Depth
Proportion of 1 minute epochs of CPR with depth of 5cm to 6cm
During simulation scenario -Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (7)
CPR Rate
During simulation scenario - Day 1
Chest Compression Fraction
During simulation scenario - Day 1
Perception of CPR Quality - Depth
Data collected immediately following the simulation session - Day 1
Perception of CPR Quality - Rate
Data collected immediately following the simulation session - Day 1
Perception of CPR Quality - Chest compression fraction
Data collected immediately following the simulation session -Day 1
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Teams with no CPR Coach
NO INTERVENTIONThis will be a standardized Resuscitation team with no CPR Coach
Teams with CPR Coach
EXPERIMENTALThis will be a standardized Resuscitation team where one member will be the CPR Coach and provide CPR Coaching to the team.
Interventions
Teams in the experimental arm will have a member of their team assigned to be the CPR Coach. This person will provide CPR Coaching in the form of feedback in CPR quality (depth, rate) to the CPR providers as well as provide guidance on time for defibrillation, etc.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Team Members: (i) Pediatric healthcare providers: such as nurses, nurse practitioners, respiratory therapists and residents (pediatric, emergency medicine, anesthesia, family medicine); and (ii) Basic Life Support (BLS), Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) or Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) certification within the past two years;
- Team Leaders: (i) Residents (Year 3 or 4) in pediatrics, family medicine, anesthesia, or emergency medicine training programs or fellows in pediatric emergency medicine, pediatric critical care or pediatric anesthesia subspecialty training programs; (ii) Attending physicians from pediatric intensive care, pediatric emergency medicine, general pediatrics; and (iii) PALS certification in the past two years or are PALS
You may not qualify if:
- Not BLS certified
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- KidSIM Simulation Programlead
- KidSIM-ASPIREcollaborator
Study Sites (5)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
Columbia University Hospital
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Hasbro Children's Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T3B6A8, Canada
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G2L9, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Cheng A, Brown LL, Duff JP, Davidson J, Overly F, Tofil NM, Peterson DT, White ML, Bhanji F, Bank I, Gottesman R, Adler M, Zhong J, Grant V, Grant DJ, Sudikoff SN, Marohn K, Charnovich A, Hunt EA, Kessler DO, Wong H, Robertson N, Lin Y, Doan Q, Duval-Arnould JM, Nadkarni VM; International Network for Simulation-Based Pediatric Innovation, Research, & Education (INSPIRE) CPR Investigators. Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a CPR feedback device and refresher simulations (CPR CARES Study): a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Feb;169(2):137-44. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.2616.
PMID: 25531167BACKGROUNDCheng A, Overly F, Kessler D, Nadkarni VM, Lin Y, Doan Q, Duff JP, Tofil NM, Bhanji F, Adler M, Charnovich A, Hunt EA, Brown LL; International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research, Education (INSPIRE) CPR Investigators. Perception of CPR quality: Influence of CPR feedback, Just-in-Time CPR training and provider role. Resuscitation. 2015 Feb;87:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.015. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
PMID: 25433294BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adam Cheng, MD
University of Calgary
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2017
First Posted
June 29, 2017
Study Start
September 1, 2017
Primary Completion
January 1, 2019
Study Completion
January 1, 2019
Last Updated
June 29, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share