NCT04648670

Brief Summary

The participants who carry out our cognitive stimulation program maintain and / or improve their score of the 35-point Spanish version of 35 points of Mini-mental State of Folstein; Mini-exam Cognoscitive of Lobo

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
201

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2011

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2011

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2012

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 23, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 3, 2020

Status Verified

December 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

November 23, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 2, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The Spanish versions of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MEC-35)

    It is a reliable and used instrument for the evaluation of cognitive impairment. It meets criteria of "feasibility", "content validity", "procedural" and "construction". Test-retest reliability: weighted kappa = 0.667, sensitivity = 89.8%, and specificity = 83.9%; with the cutoff point 23/24. A score of 28 is considered the lower limit of normal performance in adult population; scores equal or less than 27 would denote cognitive deficits.

    baseline and change in 1 week, 6 months, baseline and 12 moths

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Set Test

    baseline and change in 1 week, 6 months, baseline and 12 moths

  • The Barthel Index (Barthel)

    baseline and change in 1 week, 6 months, baseline and 12 moths

  • The scale of Lawton & Brody (Lawton)

    baseline and change in 1 week, 6 months, baseline and 12 moths

  • The Goldberg questionnaire (EADG)

    baseline and change in 1 week, 6 months, baseline and 12 moths

  • The abbreviated Yesavage depression scale (GDS-15)

    baseline and change in 1 week, 6 months, baseline and 12 moths

Study Arms (2)

Group intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

The experimental group consists of 101 participants have been subdivided into two groups of 25/26 that perform the same intervention but on a different day of the week. The two subgroups have received 10 sessions of 45 minutes/week during 10 weeks. Each session included four parts: (a) Reality orientation therapy, (b) activities related to memory, orientation, language, praxis, gnosis, calculation, perception, reasoning, visual attention, and executive functions, (c) individual practical exercises and (d) correction of the practical exercises. .

Behavioral: Cognitive stimulation

Group Control

NO INTERVENTION

The control group consists of 100 participants. The no intervention group did not receive any type of intervention

Interventions

The intervention was applied to the experimental group and consisted in 10 sessions of 45 minutes/week during 10 weeks. Each session included four parts: (a) Reality orientation therapy, (b) activities related to memory, orientation, language, praxis, gnosis, calculation, perception, reasoning, visual attention, and executive functions, (c) individual practical exercises and (d) correction of the practical exercises..

Group intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Older adults (age ≥ 65)
  • Older people with an MEC between: 28-35 points with or without psychiatric pathology (depression, anxiety)
  • Non-Institutionalized People.
  • Older people with a Lawton index greater than or equal to 3.

You may not qualify if:

  • People who have received some type of cognitive stimulation therapy in the last year, that is, people who attend memory or mental activation workshops (in the major centers of the Zaragoza City Council, elderly associations, women's associations, etc. .).
  • People who present values of more than 6 points, in the abbreviated Goldberg anxiety scale and also in the Yesavage depression scale, score more than 12/15, due to presenting intense symptoms, which made it difficult to carry out the intervention.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (13)

  • Lobo A, Saz P, Marcos G, Dia JL, de la Camara C, Ventura T, Morales Asin F, Fernando Pascual L, Montanes JA, Aznar S. [Revalidation and standardization of the cognition mini-exam (first Spanish version of the Mini-Mental Status Examination) in the general geriatric population]. Med Clin (Barc). 1999 Jun 5;112(20):767-74. Spanish.

    PMID: 10422057BACKGROUND
  • Goldberg D, Bridges K, Duncan-Jones P, Grayson D. Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings. BMJ. 1988 Oct 8;297(6653):897-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6653.897.

    PMID: 3140969BACKGROUND
  • Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available.

    PMID: 5349366BACKGROUND
  • Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982-1983;17(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4.

    PMID: 7183759BACKGROUND
  • Pascual Millan LF, Martinez Quinones JV, Modrego Pardo P, Mostacero Miguel E, Lopez del Val J, Morales Asin F. [The set-test for diagnosis of dementia]. Neurologia. 1990 Mar;5(3):82-5. Spanish.

    PMID: 2361045BACKGROUND
  • Lee SW, Taylor R, Kielhofner G, Fisher G. Theory use in practice: a national survey of therapists who use the Model of Human Occupation. Am J Occup Ther. 2008 Jan-Feb;62(1):106-17. doi: 10.5014/ajot.62.1.106.

    PMID: 18254437BACKGROUND
  • Vinyoles Bargallo E, Vila Domenech J, Argimon Pallas JM, Espinas Boquet J, Abos Pueyo T, Limon Ramirez E; Los investigadores del proyecto Cuido 1*. [Concordance among Mini-Examen Cognoscitivo and Mini-Mental State Examination in cognitive impairment screening]. Aten Primaria. 2002 Jun 15;30(1):5-13. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)78956-7. Spanish.

    PMID: 12106573BACKGROUND
  • Hanninen T, Koivisto K, Reinikainen KJ, Helkala EL, Soininen H, Mykkanen L, Laakso M, Riekkinen PJ. Prevalence of ageing-associated cognitive decline in an elderly population. Age Ageing. 1996 May;25(3):201-5. doi: 10.1093/ageing/25.3.201.

    PMID: 8670552BACKGROUND
  • Novoa AM, Juarez O, Nebot M. [Review of the effectiveness of cognitive interventions in preventing cognitive deterioration in healthy elderly individuals]. Gac Sanit. 2008 Sep-Oct;22(5):474-82. doi: 10.1157/13126930. Spanish.

    PMID: 19000530BACKGROUND
  • Duara R, Loewenstein DA, Greig M, Acevedo A, Potter E, Appel J, Raj A, Schinka J, Schofield E, Barker W, Wu Y, Potter H. Reliability and validity of an algorithm for the diagnosis of normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia: implications for multicenter research studies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;18(4):363-70. doi: 10.1097/jgp.0b013e3181c534a0.

    PMID: 20306566BACKGROUND
  • Pusswald G, Tropper E, Kryspin-Exner I, Moser D, Klug S, Auff E, Dal-Bianco P, Lehrner J. Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Subjective Cognitive Decline and Mild Cognitive Impairment and its Relation to Activities of Daily Living. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;47(2):479-86. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150284.

    PMID: 26401569BACKGROUND
  • Gomez-Soria I, Ferreira C, Olivan-Blazquez B, Aguilar-Latorre A, Calatayud E. Effects of cognitive stimulation program on cognition and mood in older adults, stratified by cognitive levels: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Jul;110:104984. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.104984. Epub 2023 Mar 4.

  • Gomez-Soria I, Cuenca-Zaldivar JN, Rodriguez-Roca B, Subiron-Valera AB, Salavera C, Marcen-Roman Y, Andrade-Gomez E, Calatayud E. Cognitive Effects of a Cognitive Stimulation Programme on Trained Domains in Older Adults with Subjective Memory Complaints: Randomised Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 18;20(4):3636. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043636.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: An intervention group and a control group with the same characteristics are included.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2020

First Posted

December 1, 2020

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion

October 1, 2012

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

December 3, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-12