NCT04490070

Brief Summary

Due to demographic changes that have resulted in an aging population, the role of caregiver of an older adult has become very important in recent years. While numerous programs have been designed to lighten the caregiver's physical and emotional burden, fewer programs train caregivers to improve skills and level of independence in the person they care for. The objectives of this research study were to assess the benefits of a caregiver training program on the cognitive and functional status of older adults, as well as to compare the effects of this program according to type of caregiver (professional caregiver vs. family caregiver). Methods: The sample was composed of 160 older adults: a) 100 received care from caregivers who had taken the training program (treatment group), of which 60 were professional caregivers and 40 were family caregivers; and b) 60 received care from caregivers who had not taken the program (control group). In order to evaluate program effects on cognitive and functional status, we used both direct measures (MMSE, CAPE and EuroQol) and caregiver reports (Barthel and RMPBC).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
160

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

10 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 10, 2015

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 10, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 10, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 23, 2020

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 28, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 28, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

July 23, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 27, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Older adultsCaregiver training programCognitive stimulationProfessional caregiversFamily caregivers

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Mini-Examen-Cognoscitivo (MEC), Spanish adaptation of the Mini-Mental-State-Examination (MMSE).

    This screening instrument is widely used for detecting cognitive impairment. The final score ranges from 0 to 35 points and is often used as a global index and method for monitoring the evolution of cognitive functions in cognitive impairment and dementia. It has high internal consistency (α = 0.88), good test-retest reliability (0.64-1.00; p \< 0.01) and good interjudge reliability (0.69-1.00; p \< 0.01).

    9 months

  • The Procedimiento de Evaluación Clifton para Ancianos - Cognitive Scale, a Spanish adaptation of the Clifton Assessment Procedure for the Elderly (CAPE).

    In the present study, we used the cognitive assessment scale only, which includes one part on information and orientation and another part on mental ability. The final score ranges from 0 to 23 points and higher scores mean a better outcome. Its test-retest reliability falls between 0.79 and 0.90, and between 0.61 and 0.69, for the information and orientation scale and for the mental ability scale, respectively.

    9 months

  • EuroQol

    Generic measure of health-related quality of life. The individual rates his or her own state of health, first rating levels of severity by dimensions, and afterward a more general assessment using a 20-centimeter visual analog scale (VAS) that goes from 0 to 100. Scores range from 0 to 2 on each of the test scales, and higher scores mean a worse result.

    9 months

  • Barthel Index

    Evaluates the person's functional ability based on 10 items answered by the caregiver. Scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 being completely dependent and 100 completely independent. Its internal consistency presents an alpha coefficient between 0.86 and 0.92 and interjudge reliability between 0.84 and 0.97.

    9 months

  • Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC), in its Spanish version.

    Evaluates problems in memory, behavior, and anxiety and depression. The caregiver indicates how often the person under her care has manifest each of the problems described during the past week (frequency scale) and the degree that this bothers or worries her (reaction scale). An alpha coefficient of 0.84 was found for the frequency scale, and 0.90 for the reaction scale.

    9 months

  • Positive Aspects of Caregiving (PAC).

    This 9-item instrument measures caregivers' satisfaction with providing care to the older adults. It consists of a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (disagree) to 5 (agree). Scores range from 9 to 45; higher scores indicate a more positive perception and gains from the caregiver experience. It presents good general reliability (Cronbach α = .89) and convergent validity (Cronbach α = .72).

    9 months

Interventions

The caregiver training program consisted of applying the cognitive stimulation model of the CUIDA-2 program. This application included theoretical training made up of three modules: 1) person-centered care, 2) communication strategies, and 3) mediated cognitive stimulation strategies. The training was given in two group sessions of two hours each, plus 50 hours of individual practice, either on the job (in the case of professional caregivers) or in the home (in the case of family caregivers), in both cases supervised by psychologists who were experts in the program. In these individual practice hours, the caregivers were required to keep a weekly log. Here they had to plan in advance the activities that they were going to carry out with the older adult, and once they had taken place, they had to record how they were done and how the older adult had responded.

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Older adults: age 65 or older, receiving care, no diagnosis of dementia, and their informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (10)

Centro Residencial de Mayores "Entreálamos"

Atarfe, Granada, 18230, Spain

Location

Unidad de Estancia Diurna de Atarfe

Atarfe, Granada, 18230, Spain

Location

Residencia de mayores María Zayas

Belicena, Granada, 18101, Spain

Location

Centro Residencial Regina Mundi

Churriana de la Vega, Granada, 18194, Spain

Location

Centro Residencial Geriatric XXI

Cúllar-Vega, Granada, 18195, Spain

Location

Unidad de Estancia Diurna Ogíjares

Ogíjares, Granada, 18151, Spain

Location

Unidad de Estancia Diurna Dr. Alejandro Otero

Pulianas, Granada, 18197, Spain

Location

Centro Cívico Zaidín del Ayuntamiento de Granada

Granada, 18007, Spain

Location

Centro Cívico Genil del Ayuntamiento de Granada

Granada, 18008, Spain

Location

University of Granada

Granada, 18011, Spain

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cognitive Dysfunction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Elena Navarro

    Universidad de Granada

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Dolores Calero

    Universidad de Granada

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Miriam Sanjuán

    Universidad de Granada

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2020

First Posted

July 28, 2020

Study Start

December 10, 2015

Primary Completion

March 10, 2020

Study Completion

March 10, 2020

Last Updated

July 28, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations