Real-World Safety Analysis of Paclitaxel Devices Used for the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease
2 other identifiers
observational
8,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Treatment with paclitaxel-based endovascular devices (PED) has become a common treatment option for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) involving the femoral-popliteal artery. However, an aggregate level meta-analysis identified an association between the use of PED and increased all-cause mortality at both two and five-year follow-up intervals, though there are significant limitations of these analyses. Exploration of real-world data has been suggested as a means to further investigate the safety of PED. The current study explores the association of PED and mortality in real-world data using U.S. commercial claims from the FAIR Health data warehouse.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedFebruary 14, 2022
February 1, 2022
1.1 years
November 23, 2020
February 11, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Survival
Freedom from death of any cause
4 years post intervention
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Survival
2 years post intervention
Retreatment
2 years post intervention
Amputation
2 years post intervention
Other Outcomes (3)
Survival for age groups
4 years and 2 years post intervention
Survival for demographics and special baseline variables
4 years and 2 years post intervention
Survival for special treatment category
4 years and 2 years post intervention
Study Arms (2)
Paclitaxel Drug Coated Balloon
Patients treated with paclitaxel drug-coated balloon
Paclitaxel Drug Coated Stent
Patients treated with paclitaxel drug-coated stent
Interventions
Paclitaxel to treat peripheral arterial disease
Eligibility Criteria
Commercial claims of patients who underwent endovascular interventional treatment of the femoral or popliteal arteries for symptomatic PAD between 1/1/15 and 12/31/2019 will form the study population. Three separate safety analyses will be performed. 1. Paclitaxel Drug coated balloons (DCB) as compared with propensity-matched patients treated with plain transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA). 2. Paclitaxel delivering Drug-Eluting Stents (DES) as compared with propensity-matched cases using bare-metal stents (BMS). 3. Patients treated with either paclitaxel DCB or paclitaxel DES (any PTX) compared with propensity-matched controls (non-PTX,with DCB patients, matched to patients treated with PTA, and DES patients matched to patients treated with BMS).
You may qualify if:
- All patients, age 18 or older, who had a health insurance claim for outpatient endovascular treatment of the femoral or popliteal arteries for symptomatic PAD will be included. The diagnosis and treatment of PAD in the femoral and popliteal arteries will be identified by CPT/HCPCS and ICD-9 and ICD-10 PCS codes.
- Presence of at least one additional outpatient or inpatient claims, at least 12 months following the index procedure, in order to demonstrate continued enrollment in health insurance coverage.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18 years
- No qualifying peripheral arterial endovascular procedure
- Inpatient procedure
- Patients without any linked claim record more than 12 months after the index procedure, not known to have died or entered hospice care within the first 12 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lahey Clinic, Inc
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805, United States
Related Publications (13)
Dake MD, Ansel GM, Jaff MR, Ohki T, Saxon RR, Smouse HB, Zeller T, Roubin GS, Burket MW, Khatib Y, Snyder SA, Ragheb AO, White JK, Machan LS; Zilver PTX Investigators. Paclitaxel-eluting stents show superiority to balloon angioplasty and bare metal stents in femoropopliteal disease: twelve-month Zilver PTX randomized study results. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct 1;4(5):495-504. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.962324. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
PMID: 21953370RESULTDake MD, Ansel GM, Jaff MR, Ohki T, Saxon RR, Smouse HB, Snyder SA, O'Leary EE, Tepe G, Scheinert D, Zeller T; Zilver PTX Investigators. Sustained safety and effectiveness of paclitaxel-eluting stents for femoropopliteal lesions: 2-year follow-up from the Zilver PTX randomized and single-arm clinical studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 18;61(24):2417-2427. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.034. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
PMID: 23583245RESULTKatsanos K, Spiliopoulos S, Kitrou P, Krokidis M, Karnabatidis D. Risk of Death Following Application of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery of the Leg: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e011245. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011245.
PMID: 30561254RESULTRocha-Singh KJ, Duval S, Jaff MR, Schneider PA, Ansel GM, Lyden SP, Mullin CM, Ioannidis JPA, Misra S, Tzafriri AR, Edelman ER, Granada JF, White CJ, Beckman JA; VIVA Physicians, Inc. Mortality and Paclitaxel-Coated Devices: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. Circulation. 2020 Jun 9;141(23):1859-1869. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044697. Epub 2020 May 6.
PMID: 32370548RESULTSecemsky EA, Kundi H, Weinberg I, Jaff MR, Krawisz A, Parikh SA, Beckman JA, Mustapha J, Rosenfield K, Yeh RW. Association of Survival With Femoropopliteal Artery Revascularization With Drug-Coated Devices. JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Apr 1;4(4):332-340. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0325.
PMID: 30747949RESULTSecemsky EA, Kundi H, Weinberg I, Schermerhorn M, Beckman JA, Parikh SA, Jaff MR, Mustapha J, Rosenfield K, Yeh RW. Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation and Long-Term Survival Following Peripheral Artery Revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 28;73(20):2636-2638. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Mar 1. No abstract available.
PMID: 30831175RESULTBehrendt CA, Sedrakyan A, Peters F, Kreutzburg T, Schermerhorn M, Bertges DJ, Larena-Avellaneda A, L'Hoest H, Kolbel T, Debus ES. Editor's Choice - Long Term Survival after Femoropopliteal Artery Revascularisation with Paclitaxel Coated Devices: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Apr;59(4):587-596. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.12.034. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
PMID: 31926836RESULTResnic FS, Gross TP, Marinac-Dabic D, Loyo-Berrios N, Donnelly S, Normand SL, Matheny ME. Automated surveillance to detect postprocedure safety signals of approved cardiovascular devices. JAMA. 2010 Nov 10;304(18):2019-27. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1633.
PMID: 21063011RESULTKumar A, Matheny ME, Ho KK, Yeh RW, Piemonte TC, Waldman H, Shah PB, Cope R, Normand SL, Donnelly S, Robbins S, Resnic FS. The data extraction and longitudinal trend analysis network study of distributed automated postmarket cardiovascular device safety surveillance. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Jan;8(1):38-46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001123. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
PMID: 25491915RESULTResnic FS, Majithia A. Registry-Based Surveillance of Medical-Device Safety. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 18;376(20):1995. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1704006. No abstract available.
PMID: 28514621RESULTHsieh FY, Lavori PW, Cohen HJ, Feussner JR. An overview of variance inflation factors for sample-size calculation. Eval Health Prof. 2003 Sep;26(3):239-57. doi: 10.1177/0163278703255230.
PMID: 12971199RESULTVidi VD, Matheny ME, Resnic FS. Post-marketing device safety surveillance. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 May;32(3):307-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Feb 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 21371573RESULTAustin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011 Mar-Apr;10(2):150-61. doi: 10.1002/pst.433.
PMID: 20925139RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sourbha S Dani, MD, MSc
Lahey Hospital & Medical Center
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Frederic S Resnic, MD, MSc
Lahey Hospital & Medical Center
- STUDY CHAIR
Robbert Zusterzeel, MD, MPH, PhD
NESTcc
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff Cardiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2020
First Posted
December 1, 2020
Study Start
November 20, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
February 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share