NCT04640077

Brief Summary

The main goals of this study are to further determine whether the study drug donanemab is safe and effective in participants with Alzheimer's disease and to validate neuropsychological assessments administered over videoconferencing

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
95

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 alzheimer-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Typical duration for phase_2 alzheimer-disease

Geographic Reach
2 countries

27 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 9, 2020

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 23, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 23, 2020

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 27, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 27, 2024

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 13, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 13, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

November 9, 2020

Results QC Date

February 27, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 23, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Part A: Intraclass Correlation Between On-Site and Video Teleconference (VTC) Assessments

    Part A didn't involve any drug and drug related efficacy analyses. Participants in Part A were divided into 2 groups, and they completed the same set of clinical assessments. Participants in Part A Group 1 completed the clinical assessments at a clinic site first (on-site) followed by at home assessments (VTC). Participants in Part A Group 2 completed the assessments at home first, followed by on-site assessment. The goal of Part A was to evaluate the comparability of remote and on-site clinical assessments. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), a measure of agreement for continuous outcome measures, was used to determine agreement between remote and onsite assessments for each outcome measure. Outcome measure tested were the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog13), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB).

    Baseline to 4 Weeks

  • Part B: Percentage of Participants With One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Percentage of participants with TEAEs and SAEs were reported here. A summary of SAEs and other non-serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events section of this record.

    Baseline Up To 96 Weeks

  • Part B: Number of Participants With Suicidality Based on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

    Number of Participants with Suicidality Based on C-SSRS was reported.

    Baseline, Week 72

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Part B: Change From Baseline on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score

    Baseline, Week 72

  • Part B: Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) Score

    Baseline, Week 72

  • Part B: Change From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS)

    Baseline, Week 72

  • Part B: Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-iADL)

    Baseline, Week 72

  • Part B: Change From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB)

    Baseline, Week 72

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Part A: Validation of Remote Scale Assessments

OTHER

Participants from the originating trials did not receive any drug in Part A. Participants were randomized 1:1 into two groups to have their cognitive and functional scales assessed. Group 1: Cognitive/functional scale assessment at the study site (on-site), followed by an at-home assessment (VTC; video teleconference), or Group 2: Cognitive/functional scale assessment at home (VTC), followed by assessment on-site. Total time in Part A was up to 24 weeks.

Other: No Intervention

Part B: Donanemab

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants who had received placebo in the originating trials received 700 milligrams (mg) donanemab administered intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 3 doses, then 1400 mg donanemab administered IV Q4W for up to 48 weeks.

Drug: donanemab

Interventions

No intervention

Part A: Validation of Remote Scale Assessments

Administered IV

Also known as: LY3002813
Part B: Donanemab

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participated in a double-blind treatment period of a sponsor-approved originating donanemab trial, for example the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ study.
  • Have a study partner
  • Stable symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease (AD) medications and other medication that may impact cognition for at least 30 days prior to randomization into Part A

You may not qualify if:

  • Current serious or unstable illnesses including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, gastroenterologic, respiratory, endocrinologic, neurologic (other than AD), psychiatric, immunologic, or hematologic disease and other conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with outcome assessments or the analyses in this study.
  • Have received treatment with a passive anti-amyloid immunotherapy after completion of originating donanemab study or received active immunization against Aβ in any other study.
  • Poor venous access
  • Contraindication to PET or MRI imaging

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (27)

Banner Alzheimer's Institute

Phoenix, Arizona, 85006, United States

Location

UC Irvine-Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders (UCI MIND)

Irvine, California, 92697, United States

Location

Bradenton Research Center, Inc.

Bradenton, Florida, 34205, United States

Location

Merritt Island Medical Research, LLC

Merritt Island, Florida, 32952, United States

Location

Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc.

Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States

Location

Advanced Research Consultants

Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 33410, United States

Location

Progressive Medical Research

Port Orange, Florida, 32127, United States

Location

Intercoastal Medical Group - Hyde Park

Sarasota, Florida, 34239, United States

Location

Stedman Clinical Trials

Tampa, Florida, 33613, United States

Location

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

Location

Josephson Wallack Munshower Neurology, PC

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256, United States

Location

The University of Kansas - Clinical Research Center

Fairway, Kansas, 66205, United States

Location

Cotton O'Neil Clinical Research Center - Central Office

Topeka, Kansas, 66606, United States

Location

Boston Center for Memory

Newton, Massachusetts, 02459, United States

Location

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Las Vegas Medical Research

Las Vegas, Nevada, 89113, United States

Location

Advanced Memory Research Institute of New Jersey

Toms River, New Jersey, 08755, United States

Location

Guilford Neurologic Research, PA

Greensboro, North Carolina, 27405, United States

Location

Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

Location

Neurology Diagnostics, Inc.

Dayton, Ohio, 45459, United States

Location

Abington Neurological Associates, Ltd.

Abington, Pennsylvania, 19001, United States

Location

Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States

Location

National Clinical Research, Inc

Richmond, Virginia, 23294, United States

Location

Bruyère Research Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 5C8, Canada

Location

Toronto Memory Program

Toronto, Ontario, M3B 2S7, Canada

Location

Clinique de la Mémoire de l'Outaouais

Gatineau, Quebec, J8T 8J1, Canada

Location

Diex Recherche Sherbrooke Inc.

Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1L 0H8, Canada

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer DiseaseDementiaBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesCognitive Dysfunction

Interventions

donanemab

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Nervous System DiseasesTauopathiesNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersCognition Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Chief Medical Officer
Organization
Eli Lilly and Company

Study Officials

  • Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST)

    Eli Lilly and Company

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2020

First Posted

November 23, 2020

Study Start

November 23, 2020

Primary Completion

February 27, 2024

Study Completion

February 27, 2024

Last Updated

June 13, 2025

Results First Posted

June 13, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
Time Frame
Data are available 6 months after the primary publication and approval of the indication studied in the US and European Union (EU), whichever is later. Data will be indefinitely available for requesting.
Access Criteria
Access Criteria: A research proposal must be approved by an independent review panel and researchers must sign a data sharing agreement.
More information

Locations