NCT04633538

Brief Summary

Comparison of standard 6 minute walk test with 6 minute walk test smartphone app.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 15, 2018

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 28, 2019

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 26, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 18, 2020

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 7, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 7, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

August 26, 2020

Results QC Date

November 2, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 14, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of Participants Who Perform App-based Home 6MWT

    Percentage of participants who perform app-based home 6MWT.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Difference in Walked Distance Between 6MWT Test at the Clinic as Measured by Physiologists and the App in Indoor Mode

    At start, at month 3 and at month 6.

  • Difference in Walked Distance Between 6MWT Test as Measured by Physiologists at the Clinic and App in Outdoor Mode at the Community

    Clinic tests at start, at month 3, at month 6. Community tests undertaken within 7 days of clinic test.

  • Test-Retest Reliability of Community-Based 6MWT

    6MWT in the community, at the patient's discretion (recommended once/month), over 6 months

  • Compliance to Monitoring Regime in the Community

    At month 6

Study Arms (1)

6MWT app group

Patients who received the 6MWT app and performed tests at the clinic and in the community using the app

Device: 6MWT smartphone app

Interventions

Use of smartphone app to measure 6 minute walk test (6MWT)

6MWT app group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients undergoing follow up in the PAH clinic will be eligible for participation. They will be approached by a member of the clinical team for consideration and recruited. We will recruit 30 compliant patients to enrol in the study.

You may qualify if:

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
  • Male or Female, aged 18 years or above
  • Diagnosed with PAH who are able to undertake 6MWT off-oxygen
  • Being of PAH group 1 or 4
  • Participant owns a compatible smartphone (Android or iPhone) and is able to use it.

You may not qualify if:

  • Long term oxygen therapy
  • Cognitive impairments
  • Rheumatological diseases that limit the measurement of finger Oxygen saturations
  • PAH groups 2, 3 or 5
  • Cannot use a smartphone
  • Pregnancy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Oxford, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Agarwal R, Gomberg-Maitland M. Current therapeutics and practical management strategies for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am Heart J. 2011 Aug;162(2):201-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jul 13.

    PMID: 21835279BACKGROUND
  • Galie N, Brundage BH, Ghofrani HA, Oudiz RJ, Simonneau G, Safdar Z, Shapiro S, White RJ, Chan M, Beardsworth A, Frumkin L, Barst RJ; Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Response to Tadalafil (PHIRST) Study Group. Tadalafil therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation. 2009 Jun 9;119(22):2894-903. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.839274. Epub 2009 May 26.

    PMID: 19470885BACKGROUND
  • Tan MP, Bansal SK, Wynn NN, Umerov M, Gillham A, Henderson A, Hildreth A, Junejo S. Long term survival of patients with raised pulmonary arterial systolic pressure utilizing echocardiography-a five-year prospective study. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2012 Dec;9(4):328-35. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1263.2012.06191.

    PMID: 23341836BACKGROUND
  • Gabler NB, French B, Strom BL, Palevsky HI, Taichman DB, Kawut SM, Halpern SD. Validation of 6-minute walk distance as a surrogate end point in pulmonary arterial hypertension trials. Circulation. 2012 Jul 17;126(3):349-56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105890. Epub 2012 Jun 13.

    PMID: 22696079BACKGROUND
  • Mathai SC, Puhan MA, Lam D, Wise RA. The minimal important difference in the 6-minute walk test for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep 1;186(5):428-33. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201203-0480OC. Epub 2012 Jun 21.

    PMID: 22723290BACKGROUND
  • Miyamoto S, Nagaya N, Satoh T, Kyotani S, Sakamaki F, Fujita M, Nakanishi N, Miyatake K. Clinical correlates and prognostic significance of six-minute walk test in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Comparison with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Feb;161(2 Pt 1):487-92. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.2.9906015.

    PMID: 10673190BACKGROUND
  • Barst RJ, Rubin LJ, Long WA, McGoon MD, Rich S, Badesch DB, Groves BM, Tapson VF, Bourge RC, Brundage BH, Koerner SK, Langleben D, Keller CA, Murali S, Uretsky BF, Clayton LM, Jobsis MM, Blackburn SD, Shortino D, Crow JW; Primary Pulmonary Hypertension Study Group. A comparison of continuous intravenous epoprostenol (prostacyclin) with conventional therapy for primary pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 1;334(5):296-301. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602013340504.

    PMID: 8532025BACKGROUND
  • Salvi D, Poffley E, Tarassenko L, Orchard E. App-Based Versus Standard Six-Minute Walk Test in Pulmonary Hypertension: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 7;9(6):e22748. doi: 10.2196/22748.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypertension, Pulmonary

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesHypertensionVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Elizabeth Orchard
Organization
Oxford University Hospital

Study Officials

  • Elizabeth Orchard

    Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Primary Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2020

First Posted

November 18, 2020

Study Start

January 15, 2018

Primary Completion

August 28, 2019

Study Completion

April 1, 2020

Last Updated

March 7, 2025

Results First Posted

March 7, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Locations