Evaluation of a New 6 Minute Walk Test Smartphone App in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension
6-APP
1 other identifier
observational
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comparison of standard 6 minute walk test with 6 minute walk test smartphone app.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jan 2018
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 7, 2025
CompletedMarch 7, 2025
February 1, 2025
1.6 years
August 26, 2020
November 2, 2021
February 14, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Who Perform App-based Home 6MWT
Percentage of participants who perform app-based home 6MWT.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Difference in Walked Distance Between 6MWT Test at the Clinic as Measured by Physiologists and the App in Indoor Mode
At start, at month 3 and at month 6.
Difference in Walked Distance Between 6MWT Test as Measured by Physiologists at the Clinic and App in Outdoor Mode at the Community
Clinic tests at start, at month 3, at month 6. Community tests undertaken within 7 days of clinic test.
Test-Retest Reliability of Community-Based 6MWT
6MWT in the community, at the patient's discretion (recommended once/month), over 6 months
Compliance to Monitoring Regime in the Community
At month 6
Study Arms (1)
6MWT app group
Patients who received the 6MWT app and performed tests at the clinic and in the community using the app
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients undergoing follow up in the PAH clinic will be eligible for participation. They will be approached by a member of the clinical team for consideration and recruited. We will recruit 30 compliant patients to enrol in the study.
You may qualify if:
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
- Male or Female, aged 18 years or above
- Diagnosed with PAH who are able to undertake 6MWT off-oxygen
- Being of PAH group 1 or 4
- Participant owns a compatible smartphone (Android or iPhone) and is able to use it.
You may not qualify if:
- Long term oxygen therapy
- Cognitive impairments
- Rheumatological diseases that limit the measurement of finger Oxygen saturations
- PAH groups 2, 3 or 5
- Cannot use a smartphone
- Pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trustlead
- University of Oxfordcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Oxford, United Kingdom
Related Publications (8)
Agarwal R, Gomberg-Maitland M. Current therapeutics and practical management strategies for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am Heart J. 2011 Aug;162(2):201-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
PMID: 21835279BACKGROUNDGalie N, Brundage BH, Ghofrani HA, Oudiz RJ, Simonneau G, Safdar Z, Shapiro S, White RJ, Chan M, Beardsworth A, Frumkin L, Barst RJ; Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Response to Tadalafil (PHIRST) Study Group. Tadalafil therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation. 2009 Jun 9;119(22):2894-903. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.839274. Epub 2009 May 26.
PMID: 19470885BACKGROUNDTan MP, Bansal SK, Wynn NN, Umerov M, Gillham A, Henderson A, Hildreth A, Junejo S. Long term survival of patients with raised pulmonary arterial systolic pressure utilizing echocardiography-a five-year prospective study. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2012 Dec;9(4):328-35. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1263.2012.06191.
PMID: 23341836BACKGROUNDGabler NB, French B, Strom BL, Palevsky HI, Taichman DB, Kawut SM, Halpern SD. Validation of 6-minute walk distance as a surrogate end point in pulmonary arterial hypertension trials. Circulation. 2012 Jul 17;126(3):349-56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105890. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
PMID: 22696079BACKGROUNDMathai SC, Puhan MA, Lam D, Wise RA. The minimal important difference in the 6-minute walk test for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep 1;186(5):428-33. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201203-0480OC. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
PMID: 22723290BACKGROUNDMiyamoto S, Nagaya N, Satoh T, Kyotani S, Sakamaki F, Fujita M, Nakanishi N, Miyatake K. Clinical correlates and prognostic significance of six-minute walk test in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Comparison with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Feb;161(2 Pt 1):487-92. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.2.9906015.
PMID: 10673190BACKGROUNDBarst RJ, Rubin LJ, Long WA, McGoon MD, Rich S, Badesch DB, Groves BM, Tapson VF, Bourge RC, Brundage BH, Koerner SK, Langleben D, Keller CA, Murali S, Uretsky BF, Clayton LM, Jobsis MM, Blackburn SD, Shortino D, Crow JW; Primary Pulmonary Hypertension Study Group. A comparison of continuous intravenous epoprostenol (prostacyclin) with conventional therapy for primary pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 1;334(5):296-301. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602013340504.
PMID: 8532025BACKGROUNDSalvi D, Poffley E, Tarassenko L, Orchard E. App-Based Versus Standard Six-Minute Walk Test in Pulmonary Hypertension: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 7;9(6):e22748. doi: 10.2196/22748.
PMID: 34096876DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Elizabeth Orchard
- Organization
- Oxford University Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elizabeth Orchard
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Primary Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2020
First Posted
November 18, 2020
Study Start
January 15, 2018
Primary Completion
August 28, 2019
Study Completion
April 1, 2020
Last Updated
March 7, 2025
Results First Posted
March 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02