NCT04632641

Brief Summary

Primary objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of closure strategies post venous access procedures. Hypothesis: We anticipate that the use of a venous closure device will decrease the time to hemostasis (TTH), time to ambulation (TTA) and time to discharge (TTD) compared to conventional methods of closure following venous access procedure.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
107

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 11, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 17, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 23, 2021

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2022

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 16, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 3, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

November 11, 2020

Results QC Date

April 19, 2024

Last Update Submit

October 1, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Time to Achieve Hemostasis

    The elapsed time between "device" removal and first observed and confirmed venous hemostasis

    Day 1

  • Time to Ambulate

    The elapsed time between removal of the final Perclose ProGlide SMC device (treatment arm) or removal of the final sheath (control arm), and the ability of subjects to stand and ambulate 20 feet without evidence of venous re-bleeding from the femoral access sites.

    Day 1

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Time to Discharge (TTD)/Length of Stay (LOS)

    up to 5 days post procedure

  • Post Procedure Major Bleeding

    up to 30 days post procedure

  • Minor Bleeding

    up to 30 days post procedure

  • Access Site Complications

    up to 30 days post procedure

  • Mortality

    up to 30 days post procedure

Study Arms (2)

Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System (SMC) - LARGE-BORE PROCEDURES

EXPERIMENTAL

Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System (SMC) will be used as closure strategy for venous access sites using sheath sizes greater than 13F.

Device: Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System (SMC) - LARGE-BORE PROCEDURES

Figure 8 Suture - LARGE-BORE PROCEDURES

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Figure 8 suture will be used as a closure technique for venous access sites using sheath sizes greater than 13F.

Other: Figure 8 Suture - LARGE-BORE PROCEDURES

Interventions

The Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System (SMC) will be used to close the vein access site(s) at the completion of the large-bore procedure in order to achieve hemostasis.

Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System (SMC) - LARGE-BORE PROCEDURES

A figure 8 suture will be done as a closure strategy in order to achieve hemostasis in large-bore procedures.

Figure 8 Suture - LARGE-BORE PROCEDURES

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients 18 years and older who are undergoing any of the following: WATCHMAN® device placement, atrial fibrillation ablation using cryoballoon or laser balloon, leadless pacemaker, Pulmonary embolism thrombectomy (Inari FlowTriever system), MitraClip transcatheter mitral valve repair at Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center from date of IRB (Institutional Review Board) approval through December 2022. All arterial line access should be radial.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients in whom introducer sheaths \>25F were used in the vein during the catheterization procedure.
  • Patients with small femoral arteries or veins (\< 5 mm in diameter).
  • Patients with access sites in vascular grafts.
  • Patients with intra-procedural bleeding around access site. Patients who cannot receive radial arterial line access.
  • Patients who have complications during the procedure not related to the Perclose ProGlide SMC closure device
  • The physician determines that they must use an alternate method as the primary venous closure method other than that which the patient was randomized to
  • Active systemic or cutaneous infection, or inflammation in vicinity of the groin
  • Pre-existing immunodeficiency disorder or chronic use of high dose systemic steroids
  • Known history of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, hypercoagulability or platelet count \< 100,000 cells/mm3
  • Severe co-existing morbidities with life expectancy less than 12 months
  • Femoral arteriotomy or femoral venotomy in \< 10 days, or with any known vascular complications or residual hematoma, or with use of an intravascular closure device w/in previous 30 days
  • Planned femoral venous or arterial access within next 30 days
  • Unable to routinely walk at least 20 ft. without assistance
  • LMWH (low molecular weight heparin) within 8 hours before or after procedure
  • Pregnant and/or lactating women
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Ali M, Masood F, Erickson L, Adefisoye J, Kanani J, Walczak S, Ajam T, Kieu A, Premjee M, Jan MF, Allaqaband SQ, Bajwa T, Khitha J, Zilinski J, Jahangir A, Djelmami-Hani M, Sra J, Niazi I, Mortada ME. Suture closure AFtEr large bore vein access (SAFE-VEIN): A randomized, prospective study of the efficacy and safety of venous closure device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Oct;104(4):820-828. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31173. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial FibrillationAtrial FlutterHeart BlockPulmonary EmbolismThrombosisSick Sinus SyndromeBradycardia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsCardiac Conduction System DiseaseLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesEmbolismEmbolism and ThrombosisVascular DiseasesArrhythmia, Sinus

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Mahmoud Ali
Organization
Aurora Health Care

Study Officials

  • Mohammad E Mortada, MD

    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2020

First Posted

November 17, 2020

Study Start

April 23, 2021

Primary Completion

December 31, 2022

Study Completion

December 31, 2023

Last Updated

October 3, 2024

Results First Posted

May 16, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Locations