NCT04645342

Brief Summary

This is a randomized controlled trial examining whether Baylis's Versacross RF wire versus the conventional Baylis RF needle is better at puncturing through a thin wall in the heart (called "transseptal puncture") as measured by time to successful transseptal puncture, during cardiac ablation procedures.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 20, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 27, 2020

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 30, 2020

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 2, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 2, 2022

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 10, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 14, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

November 20, 2020

Results QC Date

November 18, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 10, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to Achieve First Transseptal Puncture

    First transseptal time was recorded for each participant, starting with insertion of the long guidewire into the femoral short sheath (J wire for RF needle group, VersaCross wire for RF wire group) and stopping once the transseptal sheath was positioned in the LA and the dilator and guidewire were fully removed from the long sheath. Median time in minutes to completion of the first transseptal puncture during the cardiac ablation procedure between the RF needle and RF Wire group was compared as the outcome.

    0-30 minutes (from insertion of guidewire to removal of guidewire of first transseptal)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Time to Achieve Second Transseptal Puncture

    0-30 minutes (from insertion of guidewire to removal of guidewire of second transseptal)

  • Combined Transseptal Time

    0-60 minutes (summation of first transseptal and second transseptal times)

  • Fluoroscopy Time

    0-60 minutes (from insertion of guidewire to removal of guidewire of first transseptal and second transseptal)

  • Number of Participants With Equipment Exchanges

    (0-8 hours) duration of cardiac ablation procedure

  • Complication Rates

    complications were assessed during the duration of cardiac ablation procedure (up to 8 hours)

Study Arms (2)

Baylis Versacross RF wire

EXPERIMENTAL

Device: Baylis Versacross radiofrequency wire

Device: Baylis Versacross RF wire

Baylis RF Needle

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Device: conventional Baylis radiofrequency needle

Device: Baylis RF needle

Interventions

Baylis Versacross radiofrequency wire is used for transseptal puncture during cardiac ablation procedure.

Baylis Versacross RF wire

Baylis radiofrequency needle is used for transseptal puncture during cardiac ablation procedure.

Baylis RF Needle

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Patients undergoing endocardial left atrial catheter ablation procedures using radiofrequency ablation catheters for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter ablation procedures at UCSF
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent in English
  • Willing and able to comply with scheduled remote follow-up visits through 1 Year post-operative

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of a patent foramen ovale closure device or atrial septal defect closure device
  • Cryoballoon ablation
  • IVC filter
  • Deemed not suitable by study personnel

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of California, San Francisco

San Francisco, California, 94143, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial FibrillationAtrial Flutter

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Thomas Dewland
Organization
UCSF

Study Officials

  • Greg Marcus, MD, MAS

    University of California, San Francisco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2020

First Posted

November 27, 2020

Study Start

November 30, 2020

Primary Completion

February 2, 2022

Study Completion

February 2, 2022

Last Updated

March 14, 2023

Results First Posted

March 10, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations