NCT05755074

Brief Summary

Typical atrial flutter ablation involving forming a line of block across the cavotricuspid isthmus in the right atrium has become a commonly performed procedure and is considered a class I indicated procedure for patients who wish to pursue maintenance of sinus rhythm. The ablation generally involves 2-3 catheters and is typically performed through the femoral vein(s). After the ablation procedure, the patient is placed on bed rest for 4 hours, and typically discharged home the same day on oral anticoagulation. Catheter technology has improved over the past several years allowing for more rapid ablation with shorter procedure times. Ultrasound has also become more routinely used when obtaining venous access for the patient. To date, ablation of typical atrial flutter through the left or right arm has not been reported. Diagnostic electrophysiology studies have been performed through the arm and AV node ablation has also been reported from the cephalic, internal jugular, axillary and subclavian veins. The potential benefits include shorter recovery time, reduced risk of retroperitoneal bleed, and the avoidance of access complications from the groin. This study aims to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of performing typical atrial flutter ablation through the arm. Specifically, the study will aim to:

  1. 1.Compare the recovery time immediately after the procedure using upper extremity access compared to the standard approach.
  2. 2.Compare the success rate of patients that undergo ablation of typical atrial flutter through the upper extremity venous system (experimental approach) to the standard approach (i.e., through the femoral vein(s). Success will be defined as ablation that leads to evidence for bidirectional block across the right atrial cavotricuspid isthmus.
  3. 3.Establish what the potential complications are from performing typical atrial flutter through the left or right arm. The left arm will be the preferred site for access because of less tortuosity to reach the heart. If one side cannot be accessed the alternate arm will be used, but will be left to the discretion of the operator. The operator will have the discretion to switch to a femoral approach at any time.
  4. 4.Compare the complication rates of the experimental approach evaluated by the inability to access the vein, and other complications (e.g., bleeding, vein thrombosis, heart perforation) from accessing the vein in the arm to the complication rates of the standard approach.
  5. 5.Compare long term (i.e., 1 month and 1 year) success of the experimental approach vs. the standard approach as assessed by maintenance of normal sinus rhythm, without recurrent typical right atrial flutter with in person visits and phone call or chart evaluations.
  6. 6.Compare pain severity of the insertion site between the experimental and standard approaches.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 20, 2020

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 28, 2021

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 6, 2023

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 28, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

October 20, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 26, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

ablationsafetyefficacy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Recovery time

    Recovery time after procedure is defined as clock time when the patient is deemed ready for discharge minus clock time when the patient's procedure has ended

    Immediately after procedure

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Success rate

    Measured during procedure

  • Frequency of complications

    Measured during procedure

  • Complication rate

    Measured during procedure

  • One month success rate

    Measured at one month after ablation

  • One year success rate

    Measured at one year after ablation

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Ablation through upper extremity

EXPERIMENTAL

Ablation through arm

Procedure: Ablation through left arm

Ablation through femoral vein

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ablation through vein

Procedure: Ablation through femoral vein

Interventions

Ablation through left arm

Ablation through upper extremity

Ablation through femoral vein

Ablation through femoral vein

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Referred to the EP lab for typical right atrial flutter ablation as an outpatient
  • Bodyweight of 50Kg (110 lb) or above
  • Documented typical atrial flutter by 12 lead EKG or telemetry

You may not qualify if:

  • Bodyweight less than 50 Kg
  • Inability to provide consent
  • Presence of pacemaker or defibrillator with transvenous leads
  • Inpatient admission

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hartford Hospital

Hartford, Connecticut, 06102, United States

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial Flutter

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Aneesh Tolat, MD

    Hartford Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2020

First Posted

March 6, 2023

Study Start

October 28, 2021

Primary Completion

April 1, 2025

Study Completion

April 1, 2025

Last Updated

February 28, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Locations