A Study to Assess Virtual Reality by Healthcare Providers: A Pilot Study
Acceptability of Virtual Reality Experience by Health Care Providers for Improving Focus and Reducing Anxiety: A Pilot Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the acceptability of using Virtual Reality intervention to help reduce anxiety and burnout symptoms and improve focus in the workplace.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable anxiety
Started Jan 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable anxiety
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 10, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 8, 2023
CompletedJanuary 2, 2024
December 1, 2023
1 year
October 29, 2020
May 4, 2022
December 29, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Y1)
STAI Y1 anxiety measurement of the change from post-test score to pre-test score. The STAI Y1 has 20 questions on a scale from 1 to 4. The minimum score is 20 and the maximum is 80. The lower the score the better the outcome. Our outcome looks at the difference between the post-test from the pre-test, so the minimum change score is -60 and the maximum change score is 60. A higher change in score would mean that a subject experienced a worse outcome after the paradigm, while a lower change in score shows a better outcome after the paradigm than before.
2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Was the Study Worthwhile
2 weeks
Study Arms (4)
A = Virtual Reality paradigm A
ACTIVE COMPARATORBegin with Paradigm A virtual reality headgear
B = Virtual Reality paradigm B
ACTIVE COMPARATORBegin with Paradigm B virtual reality headgear
C = Non-Virtual Reality paradigm A
SHAM COMPARATORBegin with Paradigm A without virtual reality headgear
D = Non-Virtual Reality paradigm B
SHAM COMPARATORBegin with Paradigm B without virtual reality headgear
Interventions
Participants experience the paradigm in a random order
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older at the time of consent.
- Healthcare Professional with the Mayo Clinic.
- Not pregnant by participant self-report at time of consent.
- Have the ability to provide informed consent.
- Have no contraindicated comorbid health conditions as determined by the clinical investigators.
You may not qualify if:
- Currently (within the past 3 weeks) practicing mindfulness training on a weekly/regular basis.
- Currently (within the past 3 weeks) undergoing an additional program (e.g., Complementary and Alternative Medicine \[CAM\]) to improve quality of life.
- Currently (within 3 weeks) enrolled in another clinical or research program (e.g., CAM) which impacts the patients' quality of life (QOL), stress or anxiety.
- Currently has photosensitivity.
- Cannot tolerate virtual reality experiences.
- An unstable medical or mental health condition as determined by the physician investigator (e.g., pre-existing eye strain, seizures, dizziness, nausea)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
- Relay Therapeutics, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Related Publications (1)
Croghan IT, Hurt RT, Aakre CA, Fokken SC, Fischer KM, Lindeen SA, Schroeder DR, Ganesh R, Ghosh K, Bauer BA. Virtual Reality for Health Care Professionals During a Pandemic: A Pilot Program. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221086716. doi: 10.1177/21501319221086716.
PMID: 35352605RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Ivana Croghan
- Organization
- Mayo Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ivana T Croghan, PhD
Mayo Clinic
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Brent Bauer, MD
Mayo Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Virtual Reality headgear and corresponding non-Virtual Reality are pre-programmed with paradigms. Participants were unaware of the order of the experience they will view.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 29, 2020
First Posted
November 10, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
January 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
January 2, 2024
Results First Posted
December 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share