Engaging Older Adults in Fall Prevention Using Motivational Interviewing (MI)
2 other identifiers
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This mixed-methods, two-arm, randomized controlled trial will evaluate the impact of Motivational Interviewing (MI) as a follow-up care to patients who received fall prevention recommendations at Oregon Health \& Science University Internal Medicine and Geriatrics Clinic provided over 12 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 24, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 28, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 13, 2024
CompletedAugust 13, 2024
July 1, 2024
2.5 years
October 8, 2020
May 14, 2024
July 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Falls Self-Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) Results
A 7-item scale, 1-4 self-report rating, widely used to measure levels of concern related to preventing falls. Minimum value is 7 and maximum value is 28. Higher FES-I scores is a worse value since it has been positively correlated with decreased activities, future falls, and injury.
3-, 6-, and 12-months
Fall Behavioral (FAB) Scale Results
A 24-item, 1-4 self-report rating to measure frequency of protective strategies to prevent falling and risky behaviors that facilitate a fall. The average value is calculated with a minimum value of 1 and maximum value of 4. Higher FAB score is a better value since it indicates more consistent fall protective behaviors.
3-, 6-, and 12-months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Patient Activation Measure Results
3-, 6-, and 12-months
Level of Confidence to Prevent Falls
3-, 6-, and 12-months
Level of Importance to Prevent Falls
3-, 6-, and 12-months
Balance Measure (Feet Side by Side)
6- months
Balance Measure (Semi-tandem Stand)
6- months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Motivational Interviewing (MI) goup
EXPERIMENTALThe MI experimental group will receive the same measurements as the control group, and in addition, receive MI-based communication about fall prevention at eight occasions during the 6-month period. MI is an evidence-based communication approach for various health behavior change.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group participants will take part in study measurements (self-report and physiologic assessment) for 12-months. Primary assessment measures are at baseline, 6-, and 12-months and will be conducted via phone survey, video assessment, or mail-in calendar.
Interventions
The PI and two study staff members (interventionists) will conduct study visits and phone calls. The same person will complete participant follow-ups to establish rapport and consistency. All of the study encounters will be audio recorded with participants' permission and study encounter notes will be completed by the interventionist. Interventionists will facilitate MI sessions using the MI guide and a participant handout. The goal of each MI session is to identify a specific fall prevention behavior, the participant's goal with this behavior, readiness to change, specific plan to move toward the goal, barriers and facilitators, and the participant's commitment level to change.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Oregon Health \& Science University (OHSU) Internal Medicine and Geriatrics Clinic patients
- years old or older
- Moderate-to-high risk for falling using the STEADI fall screening and management algorithm
- Cognitively oriented (Mini-Cog≥ 3)
- Able to converse audibly and coherently in English
- Living independently in the community
- Able to receive study phone calls
- Ambulatory with or without assistive device use
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitively impaired patients (Mini-Cog\< 2)
- Patients who have sensory difficulty with verbal communication (hard-of-hearing despite the use of hearing aids or speech is hard to understand despite a talking device)
- Living in institutions with 24-hour care such as skilled nursing facilities
- Unable to stand without assistance by others
- Life-expectancy of less than 3-months
- Patients participating in other studies that may impact fall-related behavior change
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study enrollment \& data collection were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic in Oregon.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Hiroko Kiyoshi-Teo (Assistant Professor)
- Organization
- Oregon Health & Science University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hiroko Kiyoshi-Teo, PhD
Oregon Health and Science University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2020
First Posted
November 3, 2020
Study Start
September 9, 2020
Primary Completion
March 24, 2023
Study Completion
September 28, 2023
Last Updated
August 13, 2024
Results First Posted
August 13, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share