NCT00570206

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of Motivational Interviewing (MI) on probationer progress over a 6-month period, using probation officers as the MI providers.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2008

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 6, 2007

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 10, 2007

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2008

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2009

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

December 23, 2009

Status Verified

December 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

December 6, 2007

Last Update Submit

December 21, 2009

Conditions

Keywords

ProbationMotivational

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Revocations

    6 months

  • Absconder Status

    6 months

  • Urinalysis (UA) Data

    6 months

  • Arrest Data

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Officer Responses Questionnaire

    9 months

Study Arms (3)

1

EXPERIMENTAL

Probation officers trained to use Motivational Interviewing while conducting meetings with probationers.

Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing

2

NO INTERVENTION

Probation officers who are interested in Motivational Interviewing, but have not yet been trained to use it while conducting meetings with probationers.

3

NO INTERVENTION

Treatment as usual. Regular probation officers conduct standard meetings with probationers.

Interventions

Probation officers trained to use Motivational Interviewing while conducting meetings with probationers.

1

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants must be on felony probation.
  • Participants must be English speaking.
  • Participants must be classified as medium or high-risk.
  • Participants must be placed on a non-specialized caseload.
  • Participants must be at least 18 years of age.

You may not qualify if:

  • Does not speak English.
  • Is less than 18 years old.
  • Is not on felony probation.
  • Is not classified as medium or high-risk.
  • Is placed on a specialized caseload.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Dallas County Community Supervision and Corrections

Dallas, Texas, 75207, United States

Location

University of Texas School of Public Health Dallas Regional Campus

Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Motivational Interviewing

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Directive CounselingCounselingMental Health ServicesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Officials

  • Scott T Walters, PhD

    The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2007

First Posted

December 10, 2007

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion

March 1, 2009

Study Completion

October 1, 2009

Last Updated

December 23, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-12

Locations