Bilateral Thoracic Paravertebral Blocks in Obese and Non-obese Patients Undergoing Reduction Mammaplasty
The Performance Properties and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Thoracic Paravertebral Blocks in Obese and Non-obese Patients Undergoing Reduction Mammaplasty: A Historical Cohort Study
1 other identifier
observational
82
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Aim: Although regional anesthesia (RA) techniques are advantageous in the anesthetic management of obese patients (body mass index (BMI)≥30); their performances can still be associated with technical difficulties and greater failure rates. The aim of this study is to compare the performance properties and analgesic efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided bilateral thoracic paravertebral blocks (TPVBs) in obese and non-obese patients. Material methods: After obtaining ethics committee approval; data of 82 patients, who underwent elective bilateral reduction mammaplasty under general anesthesia with adjunctive TPVB analgesia between December of 2016 and February of 2020, were reviewed. Patients were allocated into two groups with respect to their BMI scores (Group NO: BMI\<30 and Group O: BMI≥30). Demographics, TPVB ideal US image visualization and performance times, needle tip visualisation and TPVB performance difficulties, number of needle maneuvers, surgical, anesthetic and analgesic follow-up parameters, incidence of postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV), sleep duration, length of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and hospital stay, patient and surgeon satisfaction scores were all investigated and compared.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2016
Typical duration for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2020
CompletedOctober 22, 2020
October 1, 2020
3.2 years
October 18, 2020
October 18, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) performance time
Time period between the US probe placement to the right side at T3-T4 level and the needle withdrawal from the left side T3-T4 level
0-20 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores
0-24 hours
Ideal US image visualization time
0-5 minutes
Difficulty of needle tip visualization
0-20 minutes
Number of needle maneuvers to reach the paravertebral space
0-20 minutes
Requirement of additional maneuver due to insufficient local anesthetic spread
0-20 minutes
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Non-Obese Patients (Group NO: body mass index (BMI) <30)
Patients received bilateral single injection ultrasound (US)-guided bilateral thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) at the level of T3-T4 with 20 mL bupivacaine 0.375% per injection/side.
Obese Patients (Group O: body mass index (BMI) ≥30)
Patients received bilateral single injection ultrasound (US)-guided bilateral thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) at the level of T3-T4 with 20 mL bupivacaine 0.375% per injection/side.
Interventions
The blocks were performed at the T3-T4 level bilaterally to block the dermatomes between the T2 and T6 levels (breast innervation area).
Eligibility Criteria
Patients (obese and non-obese) required reduction mammoplasty surgery and received general anesthesia with TPVB analgesia
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of 1-3
- Capable of consenting
- Capable of understanding the instructions for using the NRS pain scores
- Capable of replying the questions
- Lack of contraindications to regional anesthesia (allergy to a LA, local infection, and coagulopathy) and especially TPVB
- Absence of mental/psychiatric disorders
- Absence of chronic analgesic/opioid use
- Absence of alcohol/illicit drug use
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal of RA/TPVB performance
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of 4
- Not capable of consenting
- Not capable of understanding the instructions for using the NRS pain scores
- Not capable of replying the questions
- Contraindications to regional anesthesia (allergy to a LA, local infection, and coagulopathy) and especially TPVB
- Presence of mental/psychiatric disorders
- Presence of chronic analgesic/opioid use
- Presence of alcohol/illicit drug use
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Kilicaslan A, Topal A, Erol A, Borazan H, Bilge O, Otelcioglu S. Ultrasound-guided multiple peripheral nerve blocks in a superobese patient. Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2014;2014:896914. doi: 10.1155/2014/896914. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
PMID: 24587923RESULTFranco CD, Gloss FJ, Voronov G, Tyler SG, Stojiljkovic LS. Supraclavicular block in the obese population: an analysis of 2020 blocks. Anesth Analg. 2006 Apr;102(4):1252-4. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000198341.53062.a2.
PMID: 16551933RESULTKula AO, Riess ML, Ellinas EH. Increasing body mass index predicts increasing difficulty, failure rate, and time to discovery of failure of epidural anesthesia in laboring patients. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;37:154-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.11.010. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
PMID: 28235511RESULTSalviz EA, Bingul ES, Guzel M, Savran Karadeniz M, Turhan O, Emre Demirel E, Saka E. Comparison of Performance Characteristics and Efficacy of Bilateral Thoracic Paravertebral Blocks in Obese and Non-Obese Patients Undergoing Reduction Mammaplasty Surgery: A Historical Cohort Study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Aug;47(4):1343-1352. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03270-w. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
PMID: 36763114DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emine A Salviz, Assoc Prof
Study Principal Investigator
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, Attending Anesthesiologist, Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2020
First Posted
October 22, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 28, 2020
Study Completion
February 28, 2020
Last Updated
October 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10