Single and Double Injection Bilateral Thoracic Paravertebral Blocks in Reduction Mammaplasty
Comparison of Single and Double Injection Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Thoracic Paravertebral Block Effects in Patients Undergoing Reduction Mammaplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares the analgesic effects and dermatomal blockade distributions of single and double injection bilateral thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) techniques in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. After obtaining ethics committee approval; 60 patients scheduled for elective bilateral reduction mammoplasty and gave written informed consent, were included in the study. The patients were randomized in one of single (Group S: T3-T4) or double injections (Group D: T2-T3\&T4-T5) bilateral TPVB groups (bupivacaine 0.375% 20 mL per side). All patients' dermatomal blockade distributions (T2-T6) were followed for 30 minutes, and then they were given general anesthesia. Before extubation, 1 g IV paracetamol was applied to all. Postoperatively, patients in both groups received IV paracetamol 1 g when numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score ≥4, and also tramadol 1 mg/kg if they defined NRS≥4 again after 1 h. The primary endpoint was NRS pain scores at postoperative 12th hour. The secondary endpoints were NRS scores and dermatomal blockade distributions through the postoperative first 48 hours, postoperative time until first pain, the total numbers of analgesic requirements on days 1 and 2.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 18, 2020
CompletedAugust 25, 2020
August 1, 2020
1.1 years
August 16, 2020
August 21, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain (Numeric rating scale (NRS)) score
NRS pain score (0: no pain, 10: worst pain imaginable) on postoperative 12th hour
12th hour
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Pain (Numeric rating scale (NRS)) score
0-48 hours
Dermatomal blockade distribution/numbers of blocked dermatomes
0-30 minutes
Dermatomal blockade distribution/numbers of blocked dermatomes
0-48 hours
Block application time
2-20 minutes
Number of patients experienced hypotension intraoperatively
Intraoperative 2-4 hours
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group S (single injection TPVB group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received bilateral single injection ultrasound-guided TPVB at the level of T3-T4 with 20 mL bupivacaine 0.375% per injection/side.
Group D (double injection TPVB group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received bilateral double injection ultrasound-guided TPVB at the level of T2-T3 and T4-T5 with 10 mL bupivacaine 0.375% per injection (20 mL bupivacaine 0.375% per side as the single injection group).
Interventions
The blocks were performed at the T3-T4 level bilaterally to block the dermatomes between the T2 and T6 levels (breast innervation area).
The blocks were performed at both T2-T3 and T4-T5 levels bilaterally to block the dermatomes between the T2 and T6 levels (breast innervation area).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of 1-3
- Capable of consenting
- Capable of understanding the instructions for using the NRS pain scores
- Capable of replying the study-based questions
- Lack of contraindications to regional anesthesia (allergy to a LA, local infection, and coagulopathy) and especially TPVB
- Absence of mental/psychiatric disorders
- Absence of chronic analgesic/opioid use
- Absence of alcohol/illicit drug use
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of 4
- Not capable of consenting
- Not capable of understanding the instructions for using the NRS pain scores
- Not capable of replying the study-based questions
- Contraindications to regional anesthesia (allergy to a LA, local infection, and coagulopathy) and especially TPVB
- Presence of mental/psychiatric disorders
- Presence of chronic analgesic/opioid use
- Presence of alcohol/illicit drug use
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine
Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Salviz EA, Sivrikoz N, Ozonur A, Orhan-Sungur M, Savran-Karadeniz M, Altun D, Hocaoglu E, Celet-Ozden B, Tugrul KM. Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Thoracic Paravertebral Blocks as an Adjunct to General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Reduction Mammaplasty: A Historical Cohort Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan;139(1):20e-28e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002842.
PMID: 28027224RESULTKaya FN, Turker G, Mogol EB, Bayraktar S. Thoracic paravertebral block for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: single injection versus multiple injections. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Feb;26(1):90-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.09.008. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
PMID: 22055006RESULTKaya FN, Turker G, Basagan-Mogol E, Goren S, Bayram S, Gebitekin C. Preoperative multiple-injection thoracic paravertebral blocks reduce postoperative pain and analgesic requirements after video-assisted thoracic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2006 Oct;20(5):639-43. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.03.022. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
PMID: 17023279RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emine A Salviz, MD,AssocProf
Study Principal Investigator, Corresponding author
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- * All TPVB procedures were performed by the same 3 senior anesthesiology residents, always under the supervision of 2 attending anesthesiologists (1 senior resident with 1 attending anesthesiologist at a time) * Preoperatively, the anesthesiologists who were blinded to the group of that specific patient evaluated the sensorial blockade of dermatomes separately on both sides * Postoperatively, different anesthesiologists who did not participate in the TPVB performance process of that specific patient and were totally blinded to the group again collected the data. * Surgeons were also blinded.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 16, 2020
First Posted
August 18, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 31, 2017
Study Completion
December 31, 2017
Last Updated
August 25, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share