Effectiveness of Drainage by PCN vs. JJ in Patients With Symptoms of Obstructive Kidney Disease Caused by Urolithiasis
STONE
Effectiveness of Drainage of the Kidney by Percutaneous Nephrostomy Catheter Placement Vs. Retrograde Double J Catheter Placement in Patients With Symptoms of Obstructive Kidney Disease Caused by Urolithiasis
2 other identifiers
interventional
204
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To investigate the effectiveness of percutaneous nephrostomy catheter placement versus retrograde double J catheter placement in patients with symptoms of obstructive kidney disease (with either infection and/or pain and/or kidney function deterioration) caused by urolithiasis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 20, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2024
CompletedFebruary 28, 2024
February 1, 2024
3.5 years
July 16, 2020
February 26, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
time (hours) to clinical recovery regarding infection
Unit is hours (0-∞), higher scores mean a worse outcome. Clinical recovery is defined as reaching one or more of the following criteria (all criteria are added seperately) \- If indication for drainage is infection clinical recovery is defined as: improvement of infection, indicated by a decrease of WBC (unit: mm3) in two executive laboratory results and at least below 15.000 mm3.
3 months
time (hours) to clinical recovery regarding infection
Unit is hours (0-∞), higher scores mean a worse outcome. Clinical recovery is defined as reaching one or more of the following criteria (all criteria are added seperately) \- If indication for drainage is infection clinical recovery is defined as: improvement of infection, indicated by a body temperatur between 36.0-38.5 °Celsius. and/or * If indication for drainage is untreatable pain: Numeric rating score (NRS) considering pain resulting from a renal colic is improved and \< 3 points and/or * If indication for drainage is deterioration of kidney function: improvement of creatinine/ Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) in two executive laboratory results
3 months
time (hours) to clinical recovery regarding pain
Unit is hours (0-∞), higher scores mean a worse outcome. Clinical recovery is defined as reaching one or more of the following criteria (all criteria are added seperately) If indication for drainage is untreatable pain clinical recover is defined as: Numeric Rating Score (NRS) considering pain resulting from a renal colic is improved and \< 3 points (higher scores mean greater level of pain).
3 months
time (in hours) to clinical recovery regarding kidney function
Unit is hours (0-∞), higher scores mean a worse outcome. Clinical recovery is defined as reaching one or more of the following criteria (all criteria are added seperately) If indication for drainage is deterioration of kidney function: improvement of creatinine (μmol/L) and/or Glomerular Filtration Rate (ml/min/1.73 m2) in two executive laboratory results.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) quality of life
3 months
patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) pain score
3 months
patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) satisfaction
3 months
patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) catheter related problems
3 months
patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) cost and productivity
3 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Percutaneous Nephrostomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORdrainage of the kidney by means of a percutaneous Nephrostomy
Double J catheter
ACTIVE COMPARATORdrainage of the kidney by means of a double J catheter
Interventions
A Percutaneous Nephrostomy will be placed in patients with obstructive urolithiasis
A Double J catheter will be placed in patients with obstructive urolithiasis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- In order to be considered eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:
- Male/female \>18 year
- Symptoms and/or laboratory results indicating obstructive kidney disease with or without infection.
- A kidney or ureteral stone is present on ultrasound or CT (max 3 months old prior to presentation)
- Both drainage techniques are feasible and safe in opinion of the treating physician (from logistics point of view and in the best interest of the patient).
- Willing and able to comply with filling in questionnaires and follow-up regiment
You may not qualify if:
- A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
- Analphabetic or not mastering the Dutch language
- Pregnancy
- Usage of anticoagulation agents other than acetylsalicylic acid.
- Contraindication for either technique looking at history and anatomy (e.g. kidney transplant, pouch, Bricker deviation, urethral or ureteral stenosis)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ad Hendrikx, dr.
no affiliation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- No masking is possible because stent is visible to patient and physician
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor doctor H.P. Beerlage
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 16, 2020
First Posted
October 20, 2020
Study Start
July 15, 2020
Primary Completion
January 1, 2024
Study Completion
January 1, 2024
Last Updated
February 28, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share