NCT04594044

Brief Summary

Chronic tic disorder (CTD) may have a huge impact on life quality. Habit Reversal Training (HRT) and Exposure Response Prevention (ERP) are effective therapeutic modalities. This study examined the effect of a combined treatment using both HRT and ERP in children and adolescents with CTD. The treatment outcome was examined as an individual treatment compared to a group setting. There was no control group. The study examined both acute outcome and outcome at one year of follow-up. Predictive factors for treatment outcome were evaluated.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
59

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2015

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2017

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2018

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 13, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 20, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 21, 2021

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

October 13, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 20, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Habit reversal trainingExposure response preventionChildren and adolescents

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change of baseline Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) at 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks and 68 weeks

    Measures the change in Total tic score and functional impairment at different end points on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (unabbreviated scale title). Interval 0-100, high score means a worse outcome

    Baseline,16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change of baseline Premonitory urge (PUTS) at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, and 68 weeks

    Baseline, 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 68 weeks

  • Change of baseline Beliefs About Tics Scale (BATS) at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, and 68 weeks

    Baseline, 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 68 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Individual HRT and ERP

EXPERIMENTAL

Individual treatment with habit reversal training (HRT) and exposure response prevention (ERP) according to a protocol

Behavioral: tics training including habit reversal training and exposure response prevention

Group HRT and ERP

EXPERIMENTAL

Group treatment with habit reversal training (HRT) and exposure response prevention (ERP) according to a protocol

Behavioral: tics training including habit reversal training and exposure response prevention

Interventions

In an open randomized controlled study, youth were randomized to either individualized, or group treatment. Both therapies included nine sessions, and the parents were offered one group-session.

Group HRT and ERPIndividual HRT and ERP

Eligibility Criteria

Age9 Years - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • A primary diagnosis of either Tourette syndrome or a chronic motor/vocal tics disorder
  • Moderate or greater severity corresponding to a total score on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) higher than 13 (higher than nine if only motor or vocal tics were described)

You may not qualify if:

  • Disorders that required immediate treatment
  • psychotic disorder
  • primary severe depression
  • suicidal ideation or attempts
  • primary severe anorexia nervosa
  • Disorders that makes participation difficult
  • IQ below 70
  • a life-time diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder
  • Treatment with HRT or ERP during the last six months.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Nissen JB, Carlsen AH, Thomsen PH. One-year outcome of manualised behavior therapy of chronic tic disorders in children and adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2021 Feb 20;15(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13034-021-00362-w.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tic Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Movement DisordersCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Judith Nissen

    Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Evaluations of treatment response were made by an independent evaluator who was not blinded to the treatment allocation, yet not involved in the treatment of the patient, and blinded to any previous evaluations. The evaluators were a specialized psychologist and a child and adolescent psychiatrist with several years of experience in diagnosing, evaluating and treating tic disorders. A random sample of 10% were audiotaped and evaluated by another rater with extensive experience and expertise in the use of the YGTSS
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: In an open randomized controlled study, youth were randomized to either individualized, or group treatment. Both therapies included nine sessions, and the parents were offered one group-session. Treatment effect was evaluated after 8 and 9 months, and after one year of follow-up
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD, senior researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2020

First Posted

October 20, 2020

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion

December 31, 2017

Study Completion

December 31, 2018

Last Updated

July 21, 2021

Record last verified: 2020-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

In accordance to Danish law, personal data cannot be shared