NCT05269953

Brief Summary

Tourette syndrome (TS) and chronic tic disorder (CTD) are neurodevelopmental disorders that impact approximately 1% of 5-18 year olds worldwide. Both TS and CTD are characterised by the presence of tics, which are repetitive, purposeless, movements or vocalisations of short duration which can occur many times throughout a day. Tics can have a significant negative impact on daily functioning and quality of life, hence, many seek out approaches to manage and reduce their tics and the urges people with TS or CTD often feel preceding them. The two main evidence-based approaches to treating tics are behavioural therapies and medication; both of which can be effective, but accessibility and waitlists are often an issue for behavioural therapies and side effects are common with medication use. Consequently, there is an urgent need for the development of alternative, safe and accessible treatments. This study aims to examine the effects of rhythmic pulses of electrical stimulation delivered to the wrist in treating tics in people with TS and CTD. In recent work, the investigators have shown that this type of electrical stimulation known as median nerve stimulation (MNS), can substantially reduce tics and related urges during stimulation. The investigators now want to extend this work to examine the effects of the stimulation on a higher number of people, compared to placebo and treatment as usual. The investigators will do this through assessment of symptom change using questionnaires, interviews and videos collection during four weeks of stimulation and two time points afterwards. The investigators have developed a new MNS device for this trial which is portable and easy to use. The primary hypothesis is that active rhythmic MNS will lead to a reduction in tic severity compared to a placebo condition. The secondary hypothesis is that MNS will also have a positive beneficial effect on urges, impairment, well-being and co-occurring Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) symptoms compared to both sham stimulation and no stimulation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
132

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 7, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 8, 2022

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 18, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 26, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 5, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 13, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

January 7, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 10, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Tourette SyndromeMedian nerve stimulationChronic Tic Disorder

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale - revised (YGTSS-R) total tic severity score

    The primary outcome measure will be the scores from our core measures of tic severity (using scores from YGTSS-R). The YGTSS-R total tic severity score range from 0-50, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome. These will be used to assess any change in tic severity symptoms between groups and over the initial 4 week stimulation period.

    Baseline, week 1, 2, 3 and 4, and at follow-up points 3 and 6 months after starting stimulation

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in Premonitory urge for Tics Scale-Revised (PUTS-R)

    Baseline, week 1, 2, 3 and 4, and at follow-up points 3 and 6 months after starting stimulation

  • Change in Tic impairment (as measured through subscales of YGTSS-R)

    Baseline, week 1, 2, 3 and 4, and at follow-up points 3 and 6 months after starting stimulation

  • Change in Quality of life (as measured by Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome - Quality of Life scale (GTS-QoL))

    Baseline, week 4, and at follow-up points 3 and 6 months after starting stimulation

  • Change in Anxiety symptoms (as measured by Becks anxiety inventory (BAI))

    Baseline, week 4, and at follow-up points 3 and 6 months after starting stimulation

  • Change in OCD symptoms as measured by (Children's) Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale ((C)Y-BOCS)

    Baseline, week 1, 2, 3 and 4, and at follow-up points 3 and 6 months after starting stimulation

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Active stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Active stimulation

Sham stimulation

SHAM COMPARATOR
Device: Sham stimulation

Waitlist (no stimulation)

NO INTERVENTION

Treatment as usual

Interventions

Participants assigned to the active stimulation arm will receive rhythmic MNS 2 minutes on and 1 minute off for 15 minutes. The strength of the stimulation will be set to 120% the intensity needed to produce a visible contraction within the thenar muscle.

Active stimulation

Participants assigned to the sham stimulation arm will receive rhythmic MNS 2 minutes on and 1 minute off for 15 minutes. The strength of the stimulation will be set to 50% the intensity needed to produce a visible contraction within the thenar muscle.

Sham stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 12 years or older. Must also be able to give informed consent (along with parents/guardians).
  • Confirmed or suspected diagnosis of Tourette Syndrome or Chronic Tic Disorder with a moderate amount of tics (to be assessed during an initial screening interview).
  • Stable treatment regime/no treatment for the past 2 months (i.e. if taking medication same drug \& dosage).
  • Internet access \& access to electronic device to complete online questionnaires and video calls.
  • Participants must be able to travel to Nottingham for one visit and have reliable access to the internet.
  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the clinical investigation.
  • Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all clinical investigation requirements
  • Resident in the UK

You may not qualify if:

  • Current diagnosis of epilepsy.
  • Participant or participants guardian (if under 16) unable to read/write in English.
  • Participants will be excluded from the trial if they find the stimulation too uncomfortable during a practice session at the in person baseline visit.
  • Individuals with implanted electronic devices (e.g. pacemakers, insulin pump, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, neurostimulators).
  • Individuals sharing the household with an individual with implanted electronic devices (e.g. pacemakers, insulin pump, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, neurostimulators).
  • Individuals with current/ recent diagnosis or symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 will not be invited to visit the university until it is safe for them to do so (2 weeks following positive test).
  • Individuals with a diagnosis of non-verbal autism or similar condition which would affect ability to give informed consent to take part in the study will not be recruited.
  • Pregnant women will not be recruited for this study.
  • Participants who have participated in previous research studies involving median nerve stimulation
  • Participants aged over 90 years old

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sir Colin Campbell Building

Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2TU, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (23)

  • Jeon S, Walkup JT, Woods DW, Peterson A, Piacentini J, Wilhelm S, Katsovich L, McGuire JF, Dziura J, Scahill L. Detecting a clinically meaningful change in tic severity in Tourette syndrome: a comparison of three methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Nov;36(2):414-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Aug 31.

    PMID: 24001701BACKGROUND
  • Robertson MM, Eapen V, Cavanna AE. The international prevalence, epidemiology, and clinical phenomenology of Tourette syndrome: a cross-cultural perspective. J Psychosom Res. 2009 Dec;67(6):475-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.07.010.

    PMID: 19913651BACKGROUND
  • Cohen SC, Leckman JF, Bloch MH. Clinical assessment of Tourette syndrome and tic disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Jul;37(6):997-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.013. Epub 2012 Dec 1.

    PMID: 23206664BACKGROUND
  • Cavanna AE, Black KJ, Hallett M, Voon V. Neurobiology of the Premonitory Urge in Tourette's Syndrome: Pathophysiology and Treatment Implications. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017 Spring;29(2):95-104. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.16070141. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

    PMID: 28121259BACKGROUND
  • Leckman JF, Walker DE, Cohen DJ. Premonitory urges in Tourette's syndrome. Am J Psychiatry. 1993 Jan;150(1):98-102. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.1.98.

    PMID: 8417589BACKGROUND
  • Freeman RD, Fast DK, Burd L, Kerbeshian J, Robertson MM, Sandor P. An international perspective on Tourette syndrome: selected findings from 3,500 individuals in 22 countries. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000 Jul;42(7):436-47. doi: 10.1017/s0012162200000839.

    PMID: 10972415BACKGROUND
  • Conelea CA, Woods DW, Zinner SH, Budman C, Murphy T, Scahill LD, Compton SN, Walkup J. Exploring the impact of chronic tic disorders on youth: results from the Tourette Syndrome Impact Survey. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2011 Apr;42(2):219-42. doi: 10.1007/s10578-010-0211-4.

    PMID: 21046225BACKGROUND
  • Conelea CA, Woods DW, Zinner SH, Budman CL, Murphy TK, Scahill LD, Compton SN, Walkup JT. The impact of Tourette Syndrome in adults: results from the Tourette Syndrome impact survey. Community Ment Health J. 2013 Feb;49(1):110-20. doi: 10.1007/s10597-011-9465-y. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

    PMID: 22052430BACKGROUND
  • Robertson MM. Mood disorders and Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome: An update on prevalence, etiology, comorbidity, clinical associations, and implications. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Sep;61(3):349-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.07.019.

    PMID: 16938513BACKGROUND
  • Fernandez de la Cruz L, Rydell M, Runeson B, Brander G, Ruck C, D'Onofrio BM, Larsson H, Lichtenstein P, Mataix-Cols D. Suicide in Tourette's and Chronic Tic Disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 15;82(2):111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.08.023. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

    PMID: 27773353BACKGROUND
  • Whittington C, Pennant M, Kendall T, Glazebrook C, Trayner P, Groom M, Hedderly T, Heyman I, Jackson G, Jackson S, Murphy T, Rickards H, Robertson M, Stern J, Hollis C. Practitioner Review: Treatments for Tourette syndrome in children and young people - a systematic review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;57(9):988-1004. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12556. Epub 2016 May 2.

    PMID: 27132945BACKGROUND
  • Roessner V, Plessen KJ, Rothenberger A, Ludolph AG, Rizzo R, Skov L, Strand G, Stern JS, Termine C, Hoekstra PJ; ESSTS Guidelines Group. European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders. Part II: pharmacological treatment. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;20(4):173-96. doi: 10.1007/s00787-011-0163-7.

    PMID: 21445724BACKGROUND
  • Hollis C, Pennant M, Cuenca J, Glazebrook C, Kendall T, Whittington C, Stockton S, Larsson L, Bunton P, Dobson S, Groom M, Hedderly T, Heyman I, Jackson GM, Jackson S, Murphy T, Rickards H, Robertson M, Stern J. Clinical effectiveness and patient perspectives of different treatment strategies for tics in children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome: a systematic review and qualitative analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2016 Jan;20(4):1-450, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta20040.

    PMID: 26786936BACKGROUND
  • Azrin NH, Nunn RG. Habit-reversal: a method of eliminating nervous habits and tics. Behav Res Ther. 1973 Nov;11(4):619-28. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(73)90119-8. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4777653BACKGROUND
  • Piacentini J, Woods DW, Scahill L, Wilhelm S, Peterson AL, Chang S, Ginsburg GS, Deckersbach T, Dziura J, Levi-Pearl S, Walkup JT. Behavior therapy for children with Tourette disorder: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 May 19;303(19):1929-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.607.

    PMID: 20483969BACKGROUND
  • Cuenca J, Glazebrook C, Kendall T, Hedderly T, Heyman I, Jackson G, Murphy T, Rickards H, Robertson M, Stern J, Trayner P, Hollis C. Perceptions of treatment for tics among young people with Tourette syndrome and their parents: a mixed methods study. BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Mar 11;15:46. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0430-0.

    PMID: 25879205BACKGROUND
  • Hsu CW, Wang LJ, Lin PY. Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for Tourette syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Stimul. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):1110-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

    PMID: 29885862BACKGROUND
  • Charvet LE, Shaw MT, Bikson M, Woods AJ, Knotkova H. Supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at home: A guide for clinical research and practice. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):686-693. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

    PMID: 32289698BACKGROUND
  • Fregni F, El-Hagrassy MM, Pacheco-Barrios K, Carvalho S, Leite J, Simis M, Brunelin J, Nakamura-Palacios EM, Marangolo P, Venkatasubramanian G, San-Juan D, Caumo W, Bikson M, Brunoni AR; Neuromodulation Center Working Group. Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 Apr 21;24(4):256-313. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa051.

    PMID: 32710772BACKGROUND
  • Morera Maiquez B, Sigurdsson HP, Dyke K, Clarke E, McGrath P, Pasche M, Rajendran A, Jackson GM, Jackson SR. Entraining Movement-Related Brain Oscillations to Suppress Tics in Tourette Syndrome. Curr Biol. 2020 Jun 22;30(12):2334-2342.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.044. Epub 2020 Jun 4.

    PMID: 32502412BACKGROUND
  • Houlgreave MS, Morera Maiquez B, Brookes MJ, Jackson SR. The oscillatory effects of rhythmic median nerve stimulation. Neuroimage. 2022 May 1;251:118990. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118990. Epub 2022 Feb 11.

    PMID: 35158022BACKGROUND
  • Armstrong S, Sale MV, Cunnington R. Neural Oscillations and the Initiation of Voluntary Movement. Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18;9:2509. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02509. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30618939BACKGROUND
  • Debes N, Jeppesen S, Raghava JM, Groth C, Rostrup E, Skov L. Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Analysis of the Developmental Changes of Tourette Syndrome Reveal Reduced Diffusion in the Cortico-Striato-Thalamo-Cortical Pathways. J Child Neurol. 2015 Sep;30(10):1315-26. doi: 10.1177/0883073814560629. Epub 2014 Dec 22.

    PMID: 25535056BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tourette SyndromeTic Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Basal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement DisordersHeredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous SystemNeurodegenerative DiseasesGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The member of the research team performing allocation will not be involved in the collection or processing of measurement outcomes (questionnaire/ video data). This same researcher will also be responsible for assigning participants to interventions by programming the MNS devices to deliver sham/active stimulation. This member of the research team will be responsible for creating and maintaining a document which links each participants unique ID with the condition they have been assigned to. All other members of the research team, participants and legal guardians will be blind to sham/active group allocation. Participants in the waitlist group and their carers will not be blind to the group they have been allocated to. Participants allocated to the waitlist group will not be blind to the stimulation type they will receive (i.e., all participants initially allocated to the waitlist group will go on to receive active rhythmic MNS at the conclusion of their participation).
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomly allocated into three groups (ratio: 1:1:1): active stimulation, sham stimulation and waitlist (no stimulation). Those in the waitlist group would receive treatment as normal, prior to an open label phase of receiving active stimulation.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2022

First Posted

March 8, 2022

Study Start

March 18, 2022

Primary Completion

September 26, 2022

Study Completion

March 5, 2023

Last Updated

March 13, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations