The Efficacy of a Toothpaste to Reduce Sensitivity
1 other identifier
interventional
626
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hypersensitivity
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Sep 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 30, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 17, 2010
CompletedMarch 7, 2012
June 1, 2011
3 months
September 26, 2008
August 24, 2010
March 5, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Hypersensitivity Tactile(Yeaple Probe)
Measured with an electronic force sensing probe (Yeaple Probe): 10, 20, 30, 40, up to 50 grams of force are applied to hypersensitive tooth until pain elicited. Grams of force needed to elicit pain are recorded as hypersensitivity score for the tooth. For Tactile Hypersensitivity: The higher the score (the more grams of force needed to elicit a response of pain), the lower the hypersensitivity. Hypersensitivity scores on a per study subject basis are recorded as mean scores of two hypersensitive teeth
4 weeks
Hypersensitivity Tactile (Yeaple Probe)
Measured with an electronic force sensing probe (Yeaple Probe): 10, 20, 30, 40, up to 50 grams of force are applied to hypersensitive tooth until pain elicited. Grams of force needed to elicit pain are recorded as hypersensitivity score for the tooth. For Tactile Hypersensitivity: The higher the score (the more grams of force needed to elicit a response of pain), the lower the hypersensitivity. Hypersensitivity scores on a per study subject basis are recorded as mean scores of two hypersensitive teeth
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Air Blast Hypersensitivity (4 Week)
4 weeks
Air Blast Hypersensitivity (8 Week)
8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
A
EXPERIMENTALsensitive toothpaste
B
ACTIVE COMPARATORTriclosan control toothpaste
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female subjects, ages: 12 years or older.
- Availability for the eight-week duration of the study.
- Two sensitive teeth, which must be anterior to the molars, and demonstrate cervical erosion/abrasion or gingival recession.
- Qualifying response to Tactile stimuli (Yeaple Probe) as defined by a score between 10-50 grams of force.
- Qualifying response to the Air Blast stimuli as defined by a score of 2 or 3 on the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale.
- Subjects need to satisfy the qualifying response to stimuli for both parameters assessed (Tactile or Air Blast) on at least two teeth to be entered into the study.
- Good general health with no known allergies to products being tested.
- Use of a non-desensitizing dentifrice for one month prior to entry into the study.
- Signed Informed Consent Form.
You may not qualify if:
- Gross oral pathology, chronic disease, or history of allergy to test products.
- Advanced periodontal disease or treatment for periodontal disease (including surgery) within the past twelve months.
- Sensitive teeth with a mobility greater than one.
- Teeth with extensive/defective restorations (including prosthetic crowns), suspected pulpitis, caries, cracked enamel, or used as abutments for removable partial dentures.
- Regular use of anticonvulsants, antihistamines, sedatives, tranquilizers, anti-inflammatory drugs, or analgesics.
- Participation in a desensitizing dentifrice study or regular use of a desensitizing dentifrice within the past one month.
- Current participation in any other clinical study.
- Allergies to triclosan, or oral care products, personal care consumer products, or their ingredients.
- Medical condition which prohibits not eating/drinking for 4 hours.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Concordia Clinical Research
Cedar Knolls, New Jersey, 08225, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- William De Vizio
- Organization
- Colgate Palmolive Co.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Augusto Elias, DDS
Univ of Puerto Rico
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2008
First Posted
September 30, 2008
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
March 7, 2012
Results First Posted
September 17, 2010
Record last verified: 2011-06