Run Daddy Run! A Lifestyle Intervention Focusing on Fathers and Their Children
RDR
Run, Daddy, Run! A Multicomponent eHealth Lifestyle Intervention for the Prevention of Overweight and Obesity: Engaging Fathers and Their Children
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to develop and implement a multicomponent eHealth lifestyle intervention (focusing on (co-) physical activity and screen time) for fathers and their children, aiming to prevent childhood overweight and obesity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedJanuary 29, 2021
September 1, 2020
8 months
September 9, 2020
January 26, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in co-physical Activity
Father-child co-physical activity, will be subjectively measured using a seven-day recall diary, in which fathers will be asked to report all physical activities and screen time activities they performed together with their child in the last 7 days. More specifically, fathers have to report the start hour of the activity/activities, duration of the activity/activities, and the activity/activities itself in this diary, for each day of the week. PA diaries are often economical and can provide information on the types of activity not recorded from more objective measurement methods, such as accelerometers \[66\]. According to Matthews et al. (2002), diary based self-reported instruments can provide, with good participation compliance, accurate and valid assessments of PA \[67\].
8 months (post-test), 14 months (follow-up)
Change in physical activity father
Objective PA data will be collected through accelerometry. Axivity's (model AX3, 3-axial) will be worn by the father and the child for at least 7 consecutive days, on the non-dominant hand, for 24 hours a day. Participants' light (LPA), moderate (MPA), vigorous (VPA) and total PA will be assessed during this time period, which have been shown to be reliable and valid \[60\]. As an additional measure of (self-report) PA, fathers will be asked to complete the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF), for both himself and his child, questioning LPA, MPA and VPA during the past seven days \[61, 62\].Research comparing the IPAQ-SF with objective measures (i.e. accelerometers) shows that the criterion validity of this questionnaire is fair to good, with an ICC 0.30 \[62\]. Overall, the IPAQ-SF has reasonable (test-retest) reliability (ICC=0.65) a good internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha=0.83) \[63\].
8 months (post-test)
Change in physical activity child
Objective PA data will be collected through accelerometry. Axivity's (model AX3, 3-axial) will be worn by the father and the child for at least 7 consecutive days, on the non-dominant hand, for 24 hours a day. Participants' light (LPA), moderate (MPA), vigorous (VPA) and total PA will be assessed during this time period, which have been shown to be reliable and valid \[60\]. As an additional measure of (self-report) PA, fathers will be asked to complete the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF), for both himself and his child, questioning LPA, MPA and VPA during the past seven days \[61, 62\].Research comparing the IPAQ-SF with objective measures (i.e. accelerometers) shows that the criterion validity of this questionnaire is fair to good, with an ICC 0.30 \[62\]. Overall, the IPAQ-SF has reasonable (test-retest) reliability (ICC=0.65) a good internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha=0.83) \[63\].
8 months (post-test)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change in co-screen time
8 months (post-test)
Change in Sedentary behaviour (including screen time) father
8 months (post-test)
Change in Sedentary behaviour (including screen time) child
8 months (post-test)
Change in Father-child relationship (quality of relationship)
8 months (post-test), 14 months (follow-up)
Change in psychosocial determinants (co)PA
8 months (post-test), 14 months (follow-up)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Interactive father-child sessions and use of website
EXPERIMENTALIntervention group will receive the Run Daddy Run intervention.
No intervention (no interactive father-child sessions and use of website)
NO INTERVENTIONIntervention group will not receive the Run Daddy Run intervention.
Interventions
The Run Daddy Run intervention will consist of 5 (inter)active sessions for fathers and their children + 1 follow-up session, each session lasting 90 minutes. These sessions will be given to 8 groups of +- 13 families (fathers and their children), guided by 2 facilitators and will take place every 2 weeks, at a location in the neighborhood of fathers and children (e.g. school of the children). Additionally, a website will be available for the fathers and their children, with additional information about the project, tips and information about being active together (e.g. movement breaks, fundamental movement skills, etc.) and limiting screen time. In addition, fathers and their children will also log their goals on this website, and between two sessions (= a period of 2 weeks) they will be asked to keep track of their co-PA on this website, aiming to reach their goal.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Fathers
- Primary school aged children
You may not qualify if:
- \- Unhealthy/disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Ghentlead
- Research Foundation Flanderscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ghent University
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Related Publications (2)
Latomme J, Morgan PJ, Chastin S, Brondeel R, Cardon G. Effects of a family-based lifestyle intervention on co-physical activity and other health-related outcomes of fathers and their children: the 'Run Daddy Run' intervention. BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;23(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15191-z.
PMID: 36793044DERIVEDLatomme J, Morgan PJ, De Craemer M, Brondeel R, Verloigne M, Cardon G. A Family-Based Lifestyle Intervention Focusing on Fathers and Their Children Using Co-Creation: Study Protocol of the Run Daddy Run Intervention. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 13;18(4):1830. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041830.
PMID: 33668562DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Greet Cardon
University Ghent
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants are allocated to the intervention or control group by the researcher.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2020
First Posted
October 19, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2019
Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
January 29, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share