Improving Cancer On-treatment Symptom Management
IMPROVE
Improving Cancer Care by Incorporating the Patient's Voice Into On-treatment Symptom Management
2 other identifiers
observational
104
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is an umbrella term that refers to any report on a health status measure that is reported directly by the patient, without the influence of clinicians or anyone else. PROMs have been shown to more closely reflect a patient's daily health status when compared to physician-reported measures. However, research is needed to evaluate if patient symptom reporting during definitive-intent radiotherapy allows earlier and improved detection of treatment toxicity. The IMPROVE pilot study will describe the proportion of patients with cancer with changes in physician-perception of treatment-related toxicity that result from routine physician review of PROMs reported during definitive radiotherapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Nov 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 6, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 16, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 23, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 25, 2025
CompletedSeptember 25, 2025
September 1, 2025
2.7 years
October 6, 2020
September 4, 2025
September 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Participants With Change in Their Physician-assessed Burden Score
The primary outcome is patients with any change in physicians-assessed burden scores for at least one radiotherapy on-treatment visit. Lee et al. demonstrated the feasibility of using a global burden score to capture the provider's overall perception of the combined burden of all assessed symptoms, using a visual analogue scale demarcating an aggregate score from 0 to 10. This scale uses anchors at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 for no, mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening adverse events, and death, respectively. A 2-point score change correlates to a change to the next anchored score (i.e., mild to moderate, 2 to 4; or moderate to severe, 4 to 6)
Up to 2 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Participants With Changes in the Management of On-treatment Symptoms
Up to 2 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Management Changes as Assessed by a Clinician Feedback Form
Up to 2 months
Study Arms (1)
Patients with cancer treated with definitive-intent radiotherapy
Histologically confirmed loco-regional to advanced primary cancer, including but not limited to lung cancer, esophageal, or gastro-intestinal cancers at risk of developing radiotherapy-related toxicity.
Eligibility Criteria
Our study population will be treating radiation oncologists and their primary cancer patients requiring definitive treatment with radiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy as per the inclusion criteria below. Cancer patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy or hypo-fractionated definitive radiation will not be recruited as these patients represent a different treatment population with a much lower overall treatment toxicity burden.
You may qualify if:
- Men and women over 18 years of age
- Able to read and write in English or able to understand/answer questions with the aid of an interpreter
- Histologically confirmed loco-regional to advanced primary cancer, including but not limited to lung cancer, esophageal, or gastro-intestinal cancers at risk of developing radiotherapy-related toxicity.
- Receiving definitive conventionally-fractionated radiation treatment with or without chemotherapy
You may not qualify if:
- Patients receiving radiation for palliative intent
- Patients who do not provide informed consent
- Patients who chose to withdraw from the study
- Radiation Oncologists
- Must be the physician overseeing the care of the patient who answers the PROMS
- Have not provided informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Bayview Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21227, United States
Khinh Voong
Baltimore, Maryland, 21230, United States
Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231, United States
Suburban Hospital
Bethesda, Maryland, 20814, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ranh Voong, MD
- Organization
- Johns Hopkins University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ranh Voong, MD
SKCCC at Johns hopkins
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2020
First Posted
October 19, 2020
Study Start
November 16, 2020
Primary Completion
July 23, 2023
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
September 25, 2025
Results First Posted
September 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09