NCT04588155

Brief Summary

Kinematic and temporal analysis of the movement helps researchers and clinicians to better understand the way humans move and interact within the environment in which they live, better describe the alterations coming from impairments, and finally allow to better tailor interventions for patients. In this perspective, motion analysis has become, in the last 30 years, a remarkable and important field of research. Even if movement assessment should be a cornerstone for definition and modulation of rehabilitation interventions, there are still few motion analysis devices that are able to influence the clinical decision process; motion analysis labs are among those, but their use is unfortunately limited due to the costs of instruments and analysis. Other small unobtrusive wearable devices, easier to use and cost-effective, have been developed, like Inertial measurement units (IMU), composed by accelerometers and gyroscopes. They could therefore represent an incentive for a more widespread use of motion analysis within daily clinical activity in Rehabilitaion. Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) is a simple, widely used, functional test which involves standing up from a chair, walking three meters, turning, and going back to sit. It is used to evaluate movement, mobility, dynamic and static balance in people with musculoskeletal impairment, neurological diseases, aging related conditions, and the quality of life in people with low back pain. The only and easy outcome considered is the time to completion. Nevertheless, the application of an IMU to a subject performing TUG can provide other objective, quantitative data, like temporal and kinematic parameters of the whole test and its sub-phases. The instrumented TUG (iTUG) has already been applied, mainly in the neurorehabilitation field, in particular for Parkinson's disease and for post-stroke impairments. cLBP is one of the most burdensome health problem worldwide. cLBP has been considered a bio-psycho-social disease, characterized by pain in the lumbar region, functional impairments, and condition-related disability. Despite the obvious motor problems affecting people with cLBP, to the best of our knowledge, chronic low back pain (cLBP) has not yet been explored using iTUG. The aim of study is to analyse temporal and kinematic parameters of cLBP subjects compared to BMI and age-matched healthy subjects, through iTUG and to explore the correlations of those parameters with pain and disability.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 9, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 30, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 30, 2020

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 17, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 19, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 19, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

September 17, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 8, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Chronic Low-back PainFunctional assessmentTime Up and Go TestInertial measurement unit

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Temporal parameters of movement

    Temporal analysis of TUG performance

    through study completion, an average of 2 month

  • Kinematic parameters of movement

    Kinematic analysis of TUG performance

    through study completion, an average of 2 month

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

    through study completion, an average of 2 month

  • Numerical Pain Rating Scale

    through study completion, an average of 2 month

Study Arms (2)

Chronic Low-Back Pain

Subjects diagnosed with Chronic Low-Back Pain in rehabilitation program: functional assessment (with temporal and kinematic analysis) and clinical assessment.

Device: Functional assessmentOther: Clinical assessment

Healthy

Healthy subjects: functional assessment (with temporal and kinematic analysis)

Device: Functional assessment

Interventions

Timed Up and Go Test administration with application of Inertial Measurement Unit for a temporal and kinematic assessment of movement performed during test esecution

Chronic Low-Back PainHealthy

Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) to assess the level of functional impairment and disability in the activity of daily living Numerical Pain Rating System (NPRS) administration to quantify level of pain experienced just before the TUG test execution

Chronic Low-Back Pain

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Population of Chronic Low Back Pain subjects participating to an outpatient rehabilitation program; Population of healthy subjects, age and BMI-matched with the Low Back Pian sample.

You may qualify if:

  • Pain from at least 3 months
  • Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) ≥ 4

You may not qualify if:

  • History of neurological impairment or disease,
  • Other orthopaedic impairment within the past 6 months or surgery in the previous 6 months.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus - Centro Ettore Spalenza

Rovato, Brescia, 25038, Italy

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Buraschi R, Pollet J, Villafane JH, Piovanelli B, Negrini S. Temporal and kinematic analyses of timed up and go test in chronic low back pain patients. Gait Posture. 2022 Jul;96:137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.05.027. Epub 2022 May 26.

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2020

First Posted

October 19, 2020

Study Start

December 9, 2019

Primary Completion

January 30, 2020

Study Completion

January 30, 2020

Last Updated

October 19, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Locations