Influence of Health Determinants on Physical Exercise Therapy With a Neurocognitive Focus on Chronic Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Protocols in which pain neuroscience education is combined with physical exercise have shown recently greater effectiveness in the treatment of low back pain in comparison to protocols based only on one of the two approaches. The professional caregiver has a high incidence of low back pain related to the specific aspects of this collection with the low physical condition, the typical tasks performed and other psychosocial aspects. Individual characteristics of these caregivers may condition the effectiveness of the therapy as well as demographic aspects or the alliance between patient and physiotherapist. The aim of this study is to determine the influence of certain health determinants on the effectiveness of a therapy that combines pain neuroscience education and motor control training from a neurocognitive perspective on chronic low back pain in a population of professional caregivers in Bages, analyzing the reduction of low back pain, the improvement of functionality, the reduction of muscle movement and the improvement of muscle coordination. It will be a quasi-experimental pre-post design, prospective, with a control group, lasting 3 months. The intervention will be performed using a sample of professional caregivers, and the data will be collected before the intervention, at the end of the intervention, and 3-6 months after the intervention. Pain, functionality, conducts of fear/avoidance, and muscular coordination will be analyzed
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2020
CompletedOctober 4, 2019
October 1, 2019
5 months
October 1, 2019
October 3, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change from Baseline in Pain perceived at 3 months: Visual Analogue Scale
Analisis of pain, using the Visual Analogue Scale, that measure from 0 (no pain) to 10 (excruciating pain)
Baseline and 3 months
Change from Baseline in Pain perceived at 6 months: Visual Analogue Scale
Analisis of pain, using the Visual Analogue Scale, that measure from 0 (no pain) to 10 (excruciating pain)
Baseline and 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change from Baseline in Fear and avoidance of movement at 3 months
Baseline and 3 months
Change from Baseline in Pain disability at 3 months: Oswestry Disability Index
Baseline and 3 months
Study Arms (2)
specific intervention (experimental)
EXPERIMENTALSpecific intervention (experimental). The intervention group will carry out 3 sessions of specific pain education + 15 sessions of physical training.
control group (no intervention)
ACTIVE COMPARATORNO intervention
Interventions
The physiotherapist of the institution will execute the intervention on the group: * 3 first pedagogical sessions on the neurophysiology of pain, distributed: 1 group session, 1 individual session at home, 1 in a personal interview format. These 3 sessions will last 2 weeks to be completed. * Afterward, the protocol of physical exercise training will begin, supervised by the same physiotherapist who carried out the three initial sessions. There will be 15 sessions of specific and individualized physical exercise, in small groups of maximum 5 people. The duration of this part will be 10 weeks, so that from week 1 to 5 is 2 times per week, and from week 6 to 10 just 1 time per week.
The control group will follow its normal course of activity
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Of legal age
- Participants who present lumbar or lumbosacral pain all the time for more than 1 year
- Score of 6 on the Visual Analogical Scale
- Have been at work (same position) longer than 1 year
You may not qualify if:
- Other alterations and diseases of the musculoskeletal system that may interfere with the results of the intervention.
- Pregnancy during the study time
- Older than 65 years old
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universitat de Vic-Universitat de Catalunya (UVic-UCC)
Manresa, Barcelona, 08242, Spain
Related Publications (5)
Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Vos T, Buchbinder R. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jun;64(6):2028-37. doi: 10.1002/art.34347. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
PMID: 22231424BACKGROUNDRadebold A, Cholewicki J, Panjabi MM, Patel TC. Muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Apr 15;25(8):947-54. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200004150-00009.
PMID: 10767807BACKGROUNDKamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, Smeets RJ, Ostelo RW, Guzman J, van Tulder MW. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 2;2014(9):CD000963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000963.pub3.
PMID: 25180773BACKGROUNDMalfliet A, Kregel J, Meeus M, Cagnie B, Roussel N, Dolphens M, Danneels L, Nijs J. Applying contemporary neuroscience in exercise interventions for chronic spinal pain: treatment protocol. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):378-387. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
PMID: 28736211BACKGROUNDYang H, Haldeman S, Lu ML, Baker D. Low Back Pain Prevalence and Related Workplace Psychosocial Risk Factors: A Study Using Data From the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Sep;39(7):459-472. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
PMID: 27568831BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Júlia Jubany, PhD
University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2019
First Posted
October 4, 2019
Study Start
December 2, 2019
Primary Completion
April 30, 2020
Study Completion
December 20, 2020
Last Updated
October 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Before the intervention starts
- Access Criteria
- Only for institution director
Data about the protocol intervention, primary outcome measures and final report will be available for the Institution director.