Expansion and Reevaluation of the Implicit Association Test in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters
IAT-S
1 other identifier
observational
447
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A new approach to investigate suicidal processes belongs to the broader neurocognitive picture and are so-called implicit associations. In dual process models of information processing a second functioning mode, the automatic processing mode, complements the conscious processing. Suicidal persons tend to have a stronger implicit association with "death" than non-suicidal persons. In this study, implicit associations between different unconscious cognitive constructs are compared among suicidal and non-suicidal patients. Therefore, an adapted version of the computer-based reaction time task (IAT-S) will be used. Four different versions of IATs are tested in this study. In the first version the implicit association between "self / others" and "death / life" is assessed (1). The second and third version measures the emotional evaluation of "death" (2) and "life" (3). In addition, in the fourth version the implicit association between death / life and internal / external locus of control is assessed (4). The implicit associations of these four IAT-S versions are compared between three groups: patients with suicidal behavior, patients with suicidal ideation, and a clinical group without previous suicide attempts and without suicidal ideation. The following hypotheses are made: in all four versions of the IAT-S, patients with previous suicidal behavior will have stronger implicit associations: between "self" and "death" as well as "death" and "internal locus of control" compared to all other groups. With a more "positive" evaluation of "death" and a more "negative" evaluation of "life" than all other participants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 26, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 26, 2024
CompletedJuly 18, 2025
July 1, 2025
4.5 years
September 23, 2020
July 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Implicit Association Test (IAT)
The German version of the Suicide Implicit Association Test (Rath et al., 2018) is administered using a computer paradigm and is designed to measure implicit associations with death using D-values. D is an individual effect size assessment that reflects the comparative difficulty of performing the two response conditions of the IAT, with a value of 0 indicating that the tasks had equivalent performance (Greenwald et al., 2003). D has a theoretical minimum of -2 and maximum of +2 when blocks of the same size are compared (Nosek \& Sriram, 2007). The more positive the D-values, the stronger the association between the "self" and "death" than between the "self" and "life".
One assessment at baseline after study information and informed consent was given
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire - Revised
One assessment at baseline after study information and informed consent was given
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS)
One assessment at baseline after study information and informed consent was given
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)
One assessment at baseline after study information and informed consent was given
Mee-Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale (MBPPAS)
One assessment at baseline after study information and informed consent was given
Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-scale)
One assessment at baseline after study information and informed consent was given
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Suicide Attempters (1)
patients with a suicide attempt
Suicide Ideators (2)
patients with suicidal ideation
Clinical Control Group (3)
patients without suicide attempt and without suicide ideation
Healthy Control Group (4)
persons without suicide attempt and without suicide ideation, who do not have a psychiatric disorder
Eligibility Criteria
Patients from the University Hospital of Psychiatry
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-65 years
- Ability and willingness to participate in the study
- Ability to give consent
You may not qualify if:
- Foreign language
- Diagnostic criteria: Psychoses, strong cognitive impairments (e.g. dementia)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern
Bern, 3008, Switzerland
Related Publications (14)
Nock MK, Park JM, Finn CT, Deliberto TL, Dour HJ, Banaji MR. Measuring the suicidal mind: implicit cognition predicts suicidal behavior. Psychol Sci. 2010 Apr;21(4):511-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797610364762. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
PMID: 20424092BACKGROUNDPearce CM, Martin G. Locus of control as an indicator of risk for suicidal behaviour among adolescents. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993 Dec;88(6):409-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03482.x.
PMID: 8310847BACKGROUNDRath D, Hallensleben N, Glaesmer H, Spangenberg L, Strauss M, Kersting A, Teismann T, Forkmann T. [Implicit Associations with Death: First Validation of the German Version of the Suicide Implicit Association Test (Suicide IAT)]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2018 Mar;68(3-4):109-117. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-105070. Epub 2017 Jun 29. German.
PMID: 28718868BACKGROUNDEverall, RD, Altrows, KJ, Paulson, BL. Creating a Future: A Study of Resilience in Suicidal Female Adolescents. Journal of Counseling & Development. 2006; 84(4): 461-470.
BACKGROUNDOsman A, Bagge CL, Gutierrez PM, Konick LC, Kopper BA, Barrios FX. The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R): validation with clinical and nonclinical samples. Assessment. 2001 Dec;8(4):443-54. doi: 10.1177/107319110100800409.
PMID: 11785588BACKGROUNDBeck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri W. Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess. 1996 Dec;67(3):588-97. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13.
PMID: 8991972BACKGROUNDBeck AT, Steer RA. BSI, Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation. Psychological Corporation. 1993.
BACKGROUNDKliem S, Brähler E. Beck-Hoffnungslosigkeits-Skala. Deutsche Fassung. Göttingen:Hogrefe. 2016.
BACKGROUNDMee S, Bunney BG, Bunney WE, Hetrick W, Potkin SG, Reist C. Assessment of psychological pain in major depressive episodes. J Psychiatr Res. 2011 Nov;45(11):1504-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
PMID: 21831397BACKGROUNDLukat J, Margraf J, Lutz R, van der Veld WM, Becker ES. Psychometric properties of the Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-scale). BMC Psychol. 2016 Feb 10;4:8. doi: 10.1186/s40359-016-0111-x.
PMID: 26865173BACKGROUNDKemper CJ, Beierlein C, Kovaleva A, Rammstedt B. Eine Kurzskala zur Messung von Kontrollüberzeugung: Die Skala lnternale-Externale Kontrollüberzeugung-4 (IE-4). GESIS Working Papers.2012; 2(19).
BACKGROUNDSheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57.
PMID: 9881538BACKGROUNDNosek BA, Sriram N. Faulty assumptions: A comment on Blanton, Jaccard, Gonzales, and Christie (2006). J Exp Soc Psychol. 2007 May;43(3):393-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.018.
PMID: 18438456BACKGROUNDGreenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):197-216. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197.
PMID: 12916565BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anja C. Gysin-Maillart, PD
University of Bern
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2020
First Posted
October 14, 2020
Study Start
May 27, 2020
Primary Completion
November 26, 2024
Study Completion
November 26, 2024
Last Updated
July 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share