Point of Care Ultrasound Use by General Practitioners in France (Echo-MG)
Echo-MG
How Point-of-care Ultrasound Affects the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Process in General Practice. A Prospective Follow-up Study in France
1 other identifier
observational
655
1 country
17
Brief Summary
This study explores how Point of Care Ultrasound (POC-US) is used in general practice in France and how it affects the diagnostic process and treatment of patients. General practitioners (GPs) will register information each time they use POC-US during a one month period. The aim of this study is to describe the use of POCUS and its role in the diagnostic and therapeutic process in general medicine.
- Description of the use of POCUS through indication, organs scanned, findings, frequency , time consumption.
- Analysis of the role of POCUS in the diagnostic process: change of diagnostic hypotheses and change of certainty in the main diagnostic hypothesis.
- Analysis of the role of POCUS in the therapeutic process: change in the care pathway and the therapeutic initial plan. This is an observational study without any intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2023
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 12, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 15, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 20, 2026
CompletedJanuary 20, 2026
December 1, 2025
1.5 years
October 5, 2020
July 3, 2025
December 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Number of Patients With Change in the Diagnosis After POCUS Examination
GPs will register their diagnoses before and after the use of POCUS and a change in diagnosis will be described * one main diagnostic hypothesis * other diagnostic hypotheses After the use of POCUS, the GPs are asked if these diagnoses have changed and specify.
20 to 30 minute consultation
Number of Patients With Change in Diagnostic Confidence
The GPs are asked to register any change in their confidence in the diagnostic hypothesis after the use of POCUS by choosing one of the following variables on an ordinal scale: increased confidence, more confident, unchanged confidence, less confident, reduced confidence
30 minutes
Number of Patients With Change in the Referral Plan
Before using POC-US: * acute admission to hospital * subacute referral to hospital * normal referral to hospital * subacute referral to specialist * normal referral to specialist * referral for radiology * other referral (e.g. to physiotherapist, etc) * follow-up in the clinic * no plan for follow-up * other After using POC-US the GP is shown the "before POC-US plan for the patient" and asked if this plan has changed. If the plan has changed, the GP is asked to specify.
20 to 30 minute consultation
Number of Patients With Change in the Planned Treatment
The GPs register their planned treatment before POCUS by choosing one or more of the following categorical variables: * medical treatment * non-medical treatment * no treatment * other After using POCUS, the GP is shown the "before POC-US planned treatment for the patient" and asked if this planned treatment has changed. If the planned treatment has changed, the GP is asked to specify.
20 to 30 minute consultation
Study Arms (1)
Patient physical examination with ultrasound
No intervention
Eligibility Criteria
General practitioners practicing POCUS in rural or urban areas, alone or in groups with fixed or portable devices will be eligible.
You may qualify if:
- minimum use of POCUS on two anatomical areas
- GP activity for minimum two days / week
- A minimum of two scanning probes
- Previous participation in formal education in the use of POC-US
- Minimum six-month experience with POCUS in general practice.
- Estimated use of POCUS on a daily basis (average)
You may not qualify if:
- Conflict of interest, e.g. if the GP is part of the research group or if the GP has/had direct financial interest in selling ultrasound devices.
- If less than five patients have been enrolled
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Agence Regionale de Sante d'Ile de Francecollaborator
- Sorbonne Universitylead
- Aalborg Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (17)
Cabinet de médecine générale
Le Pecq, France, 78230, France
Centre Erdian SOS Médecins
Anglet, 64600, France
Maison de santé
Avon, 77200, France
Cabinet médical
Conches-en-Ouche, 27190, France
Maison Médicale
Égly, 91520, France
CMS Salvador Allende
La Courneuve, 93120, France
Cabinet médical
Limay, 78520, France
Cabinet médical
Mirabeau, 84120, France
Cabinet IPSO
Paris, 75011, France
Cabinet médical
Paris, 75020, France
Maison médicale
Pont-Croix, 29790, France
Cabinet médical
Saint-Etienne, 42000, France
Cabinet médical
Saint-Médard-en-Jalles, 33160, France
Maison médicale
Saint-Nom-la-Bretêche, 78860, France
Cabinet médical
Strasbourg, 67100, France
Cabinet médical Le Vallet
Vallet, 44330, France
SOS médecins
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500, France
Related Publications (33)
Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 24;364(8):749-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0909487. No abstract available.
PMID: 21345104BACKGROUNDDietrich CF, Goudie A, Chiorean L, Cui XW, Gilja OH, Dong Y, Abramowicz JS, Vinayak S, Westerway SC, Nolsoe CP, Chou YH, Blaivas M. Point of Care Ultrasound: A WFUMB Position Paper. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Jan;43(1):49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.06.021. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
PMID: 27472989BACKGROUNDWagner M, Shen-Wagner J, Zhang KX, Flynn T, Bergman K. Point-of-Care Ultrasound Applications in the Outpatient Clinic. South Med J. 2018 Jul;111(7):404-410. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000835.
PMID: 29978225BACKGROUNDÉchographie ciblée pour les cliniciens de soins de première ligne [Internet]. Département de médecine de famille. [Internet]. [cité 1 mai 2020]. Disponible sur: https://www.mcgill.ca/familymed/fr/formation/programme-residence/echographie-ciblee-pour-les-cliniciens-de-soins-de-premiere-ligne
BACKGROUNDBécotte G, Garner M, Lanctôt J-F, Parent MC. Position conjointe de l'Association des médecins d'urgence du Québec (AMUQ) et de l'Association des spécialistes en médecine d'urgence du Québec (ASMUQ) adoptée le 7 novembre 2012. :16.
BACKGROUNDMayordomo-Colunga J, Gonzalez-Cortes R, Bravo MC, Martinez-Mas R, Vazquez-Martinez JL, Renter-Valdovinos L, Conlon TW, Nishisaki A, Cabanas F, Bilbao-Sustacha JA, Oulego-Erroz I. [Point-of-care ultrasound: Is it time to include it in the paediatric specialist training program?]. An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2019 Sep;91(3):206.e1-206.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Aug 6. Spanish.
PMID: 31395389BACKGROUNDTorres-Macho J, Aro T, Bruckner I, Cogliati C, Gilja OH, Gurghean A, Karlafti E, Krsek M, Monhart Z, Muller-Marbach A, Neves J, Sabio R, Serra C, Smallwood N, Tana C, Uyaroglu OA, Von Wowern F, Bosch FH; EFIM s ultrasound working group.. Point-of-care ultrasound in internal medicine: A position paper by the ultrasound working group of the European federation of internal medicine. Eur J Intern Med. 2020 Mar;73:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.11.016. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
PMID: 31836177BACKGROUNDBhagra A, Tierney DM, Sekiguchi H, Soni NJ. Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Primary Care Physicians and General Internists. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Dec;91(12):1811-1827. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.08.023. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
PMID: 27825617BACKGROUNDLiu RB, Donroe JH, McNamara RL, Forman HP, Moore CL. The Practice and Implications of Finding Fluid During Point-of-Care Ultrasonography: A Review. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 1;177(12):1818-1825. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.5048.
PMID: 29059269BACKGROUNDVinayak S, Sande J, Nisenbaum H, Nolsoe CP. Training Midwives to Perform Basic Obstetric Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Rural Areas Using a Tablet Platform and Mobile Phone Transmission Technology-A WFUMB COE Project. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Oct;43(10):2125-2132. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
PMID: 28716434BACKGROUNDMa IWY, Arishenkoff S, Wiseman J, Desy J, Ailon J, Martin L, Otremba M, Halman S, Willemot P, Blouw M; Canadian Internal Medicine Ultrasound (CIMUS) Group*. Internal Medicine Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum: Consensus Recommendations from the Canadian Internal Medicine Ultrasound (CIMUS) Group. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Sep;32(9):1052-1057. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4071-5. Epub 2017 May 11.
PMID: 28497416BACKGROUNDKimura BJ. Point-of-care cardiac ultrasound techniques in the physical examination: better at the bedside. Heart. 2017 Jul;103(13):987-994. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309915. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
PMID: 28259843BACKGROUNDArora S, Cheung AC, Tarique U, Agarwal A, Firdouse M, Ailon J. First-year medical students use of ultrasound or physical examination to diagnose hepatomegaly and ascites: a randomized controlled trial. J Ultrasound. 2017 Aug 19;20(3):199-204. doi: 10.1007/s40477-017-0261-6. eCollection 2017 Sep.
PMID: 28900520BACKGROUNDBuonsenso D, Pata D, Chiaretti A. COVID-19 outbreak: less stethoscope, more ultrasound. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):e27. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30120-X. Epub 2020 Mar 20. No abstract available.
PMID: 32203708BACKGROUNDHocine S. Part de l'échoscopie dans la pratique de l'échographie par les médecins généralistes français. Faculté de sciences médicales et paramédicales de Marseille; 2019.
BACKGROUNDDelannoy Q. Quel est l'impact diagnostique et thérapeutique de l'échoscopie en pratique courante de Médecine Générale : Étude observationnelle et transversale. [Thèse d'exercice]. Sorbonne Université; 2018.
BACKGROUNDSorensen B, Hunskaar S. Point-of-care ultrasound in primary care: a systematic review of generalist performed point-of-care ultrasound in unselected populations. Ultrasound J. 2019 Nov 19;11(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13089-019-0145-4.
PMID: 31749019BACKGROUNDAndersen CA, Davidsen AS, Brodersen J, Graumann O, Jensen MB. Danish general practitioners have found their own way of using point-of-care ultrasonography in primary care: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jun 28;20(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0984-x.
PMID: 31253102BACKGROUNDLokkegaard T, Todsen T, Nayahangan LJ, Andersen CA, Jensen MB, Konge L. Point-of-care ultrasound for general practitioners: a systematic needs assessment. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Mar;38(1):3-11. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1711572. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
PMID: 31955658BACKGROUNDRempell JS, Saldana F, DiSalvo D, Kumar N, Stone MB, Chan W, Luz J, Noble VE, Liteplo A, Kimberly H, Kohler MJ. Pilot Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum at Harvard Medical School: Early Experience. West J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;17(6):734-740. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.8.31387. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
PMID: 27833681BACKGROUNDAmerican Academy of Family Physicians. Recommended Curriculum Guidelines for Family Medicine Residents. Point of Care Ultrasound [Internet]. [cité 28 avr 2020]. Disponible sur: https://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/medical_education_residency/program_directors/Reprint290D_POCUS.pdf
BACKGROUNDBornemann P. Assessment of a Novel Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum's Effect on Competency Measures in Family Medicine Graduate Medical Education. J Ultrasound Med. 2017 Jun;36(6):1205-1211. doi: 10.7863/ultra.16.05002. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
PMID: 28206672BACKGROUNDHoppmann RA, Rao VV, Bell F, Poston MB, Howe DB, Riffle S, Harris S, Riley R, McMahon C, Wilson LB, Blanck E, Richeson NA, Thomas LK, Hartman C, Neuffer FH, Keisler BD, Sims KM, Garber MD, Shuler CO, Blaivas M, Chillag SA, Wagner M, Barron K, Davis D, Wells JR, Kenney DJ, Hall JW, Bornemann PH, Schrift D, Hunt PS, Owens WB, Smith RS, Jackson AG, Hagon K, Wilson SP, Fowler SD, Catroppo JF, Rizvi AA, Powell CK, Cook T, Brown E, Navarro FA, Thornhill J, Burgis J, Jennings WR, McCallum JB, Nottingham JM, Kreiner J, Haddad R, Augustine JR, Pedigo NW, Catalana PV. The evolution of an integrated ultrasound curriculum (iUSC) for medical students: 9-year experience. Crit Ultrasound J. 2015 Dec;7(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13089-015-0035-3. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
PMID: 26589313BACKGROUNDAndersen CA, Holden S, Vela J, Rathleff MS, Jensen MB. Point-of-Care Ultrasound in General Practice: A Systematic Review. Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jan;17(1):61-69. doi: 10.1370/afm.2330.
PMID: 30670398BACKGROUNDSteinmetz P, Oleskevich S. The benefits of doing ultrasound exams in your office. J Fam Pract. 2016 Aug;65(8):517-23.
PMID: 27660835BACKGROUNDVan Gansbeke V. [Sonography : a future imaging modality for the general practitioner ?]. Rev Med Brux. 2018;37(4):205-213. French.
PMID: 30320979BACKGROUNDBornemann P, Jayasekera N, Bergman K, Ramos M, Gerhart J. Point-of-care ultrasound: Coming soon to primary care? J Fam Pract. 2018 Feb;67(2):70-80.
PMID: 29400896BACKGROUNDMyklestul HC, Skonnord T, Brekke M. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in Norwegian general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Jun;38(2):219-225. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1753385. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
PMID: 32314640BACKGROUNDZayyan M. Objective structured clinical examination: the assessment of choice. Oman Med J. 2011 Jul;26(4):219-22. doi: 10.5001/omj.2011.55.
PMID: 22043423BACKGROUNDTodsen T, Tolsgaard MG, Olsen BH, Henriksen BM, Hillingso JG, Konge L, Jensen ML, Ringsted C. Reliable and valid assessment of point-of-care ultrasonography. Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):309-15. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000552.
PMID: 24509198BACKGROUNDWild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, Erikson P; ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):94-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.
PMID: 15804318BACKGROUNDLemanissier M. L'échographe, deuxième stéthoscope du médecin généraliste ? Validation d'une première liste d'indications d'échographies réalisables par le médecin généraliste. [Thèse d'exercice]. Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III; 2013.
BACKGROUNDAakjaer Andersen C, Brodersen J, Davidsen AS, Graumann O, Jensen MBB. Use and impact of point-of-care ultrasonography in general practice: a prospective observational study. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):e037664. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037664.
PMID: 32948563BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mariela Skendi Study Coordinator
- Organization
- General Practice Department Sorbonne University
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mariela Skendi, MD, MSc
General Practice Department Sorbonne University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roxane Liard
General Practice Department Sorbonne University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of General Medicine Department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2020
First Posted
October 12, 2020
Study Start
January 15, 2023
Primary Completion
July 15, 2024
Study Completion
July 15, 2024
Last Updated
January 20, 2026
Results First Posted
January 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 2025
- Access Criteria
- The data are only available for collaborating researchers at the Center for General Practice, University of Aalborg, Denmark. The principal investigator will have access to pseudo-anonymized data registered on the online platform.
The data registered are available for the cooperating researchers at the university in Aalborg Denmark. The purpose of further analyses is to compare the external validity of the questionnaire.