A Novel Training Simulator for Portable Ultrasound Identification of Incorrect Newborn Endotracheal Tube Placement
1 other identifier
observational
292
1 country
1
Brief Summary
First seconds after birth, new born baby go through physiologic changes to successfully adjust to the external environment specially establishment of independent respiration. Majority of the organ systems adaptation in newborns occur gradually, but radical and rapid cardiopulmonary adaptation must occur for neonates to survive. It is during this period that approximately 10% neonates require some level of support in the form of resuscitation. A knowledgeable, quick and skillful response by all caregivers is crucial for extra uterine survival. Tracheal intubation is performed frequently in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) and delivery rooms. Neonatal intubation is a critical and time-sensitive procedure, and failure deprives the sickest newborns of oxygen. Current methods to detect a misplaced esophageal ETT in newborns are suboptimal. Physical examination findings are often unreliable, exhaled carbon-dioxide testing is often unavailable outside of resource-rich facilities and can lead to false positive results ,while chest radiographs are not only time consuming ,labor intensive but also expose vulnerable newborn babies to significant radiation However portable ultrasound machines are relatively available even in small centers mostly being used in the maternity units, being an indispensable tool for managing obstetrics, gynecology and trauma cases. POCUS methods of assessing ETT position offer an alternative that is time saving, cheap and safe, thereby of critical importance in the neonatal "time-is-brain" scenario. Our project aims to demonstrate that POCUS can effectively and accurately detect esophageal intubations, and in shorter period of time than current standard-of-care methods that are colorimetric end- tidal carbon-dioxide (CO2) detector and chest x-ray.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 23, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedJuly 5, 2018
July 1, 2018
1.3 years
May 10, 2018
July 3, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
training of health care workers
To determine if neonatal providers trained in ETT location with the simulator will detect correct ETT placement with \>95% accuracy immediately and after validation of their skills.
4 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
comparison with standard methods
12 months
Interventions
POCUS methods of assessing ETT location offer an alternative that is time saving and thereby of critical importance in the neonatal "time-is-brain" scenario. Recently the government of Pakistan began upgrading health facilities and ensuring placement of essential equipment required to provide competent medical care, which may include provision of ultrasound machines to areas where there is established benefits to their use. Presence of trained staff and provision of portable ultrasound machine with short start-up time can save newborn lives(12).POCUS method empowers health care providers to read and interpret images in real time thereby saving critical time and need for specialized human resources (radiologists).
Eligibility Criteria
phase I health care workers who currently perform standard-of-care ETT location assessment in the delivery room or NICU. phase II all newborns require intubation in labor and delivery room or in NICU.
You may not qualify if:
- Providers who are not involved in newborn resuscitation and assessing ETT location using standard methods
- \- Newborns with any congenital syndromes affecting the oropharynx or airway anatomy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Aga Khan Universitylead
- The Hospital for Sick Childrencollaborator
- Grand Challenges Canadacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Aga Khan University
Karachi, Sindh, 74800, Pakistan
Related Publications (19)
Askin DF. Complications in the transition from fetal to neonatal life. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002 May-Jun;31(3):318-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2002.tb00054.x.
PMID: 12033545BACKGROUNDSimpson K, & Chreehan, P. Newborn adaptation to extrauterine life. Perinatal nursing,. 2nd ed. ed. PA7 Lippincott: Philadelphia; (2001).
BACKGROUNDStenson BJ, Boyle DW, Szyld EG. Initial ventilation strategies during newborn resuscitation. Clin Perinatol. 2006 Mar;33(1):65-82, vi-vii. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2005.11.015.
PMID: 16533634BACKGROUNDAmerican Academy of Pediatrics/American Heart Association. American Academy of Pediatrics/American Heart Association clarification of statement on cardiovascular evaluation and monitoring of children and adolescents with heart disease receiving medications for ADHD: May 16, 2008. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008 Aug;29(4):335. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31318185dc14. No abstract available.
PMID: 18698199BACKGROUNDSchmolzer GM, Kumar M, Pichler G, Aziz K, O'Reilly M, Cheung PY. Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013 Oct 17;347:f5980. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5980.
PMID: 24136633BACKGROUNDJukkala AM, Henly SJ. Readiness for neonatal resuscitation: measuring knowledge, experience, and comfort level. Appl Nurs Res. 2007 May;20(2):78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2006.01.006.
PMID: 17481471BACKGROUNDCarbajal R, Eble B, Anand KJ. Premedication for tracheal intubation in neonates: confusion or controversy? Semin Perinatol. 2007 Oct;31(5):309-17. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.07.006.
PMID: 17905186BACKGROUNDSchmolzer GM, O'Reilly M, Davis PG, Cheung PY, Roehr CC. Confirmation of correct tracheal tube placement in newborn infants. Resuscitation. 2013 Jun;84(6):731-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.11.028. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
PMID: 23211476BACKGROUNDPeterson J, Johnson N, Deakins K, Wilson-Costello D, Jelovsek JE, Chatburn R. Accuracy of the 7-8-9 Rule for endotracheal tube placement in the neonate. J Perinatol. 2006 Jun;26(6):333-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211503.
PMID: 16642028BACKGROUNDDivatia J, Bhowmick K. Complications of endotracheal intubation and other airway management procedures. Indian J Anaesth. 2005;49(4):308-18.
BACKGROUNDAdi O, Chuan TW, Rishya M. A feasibility study on bedside upper airway ultrasonography compared to waveform capnography for verifying endotracheal tube location after intubation. Crit Ultrasound J. 2013 Jul 4;5(1):7. doi: 10.1186/2036-7902-5-7.
PMID: 23826756BACKGROUNDSakhuja P, Finelli M, Hawes J, Whyte H. Is It Time to Review Guidelines for ETT Positioning in the NICU? SCEPTIC-Survey of Challenges Encountered in Placement of Endotracheal Tubes in Canadian NICUs. Int J Pediatr. 2016;2016:7283179. doi: 10.1155/2016/7283179. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
PMID: 26884771BACKGROUNDDemographic P. Health Survey 2012-13: Islamabad. Pakistan, and Calverton, Maryland USA: National Institute of Population Studies and ICF International. 2013.
BACKGROUNDJehan I, Harris H, Salat S, Zeb A, Mobeen N, Pasha O, McClure EM, Moore J, Wright LL, Goldenberg RL. Neonatal mortality, risk factors and causes: a prospective population-based cohort study in urban Pakistan. Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Feb;87(2):130-8. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.050963.
PMID: 19274365BACKGROUNDLawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J; Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005 Mar 5-11;365(9462):891-900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5.
PMID: 15752534BACKGROUNDAga Khan University From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [07.03.2017].
BACKGROUNDChou EH, Dickman E, Tsou PY, Tessaro M, Tsai YM, Ma MH, Lee CC, Marshall J. Ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015 May;90:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
PMID: 25711517BACKGROUNDAli KQ, Soofi SB, Hussain AS, Ansari U, Morris S, Tessaro MO, Ariff S, Merali H. Simulator-based ultrasound training for identification of endotracheal tube placement in a neonatal intensive care unit using point of care ultrasound. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Nov 7;20(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02338-4.
PMID: 33160342DERIVEDMerali HS, Tessaro MO, Ali KQ, Morris SK, Soofi SB, Ariff S. A novel training simulator for portable ultrasound identification of incorrect newborn endotracheal tube placement - observational diagnostic accuracy study protocol. BMC Pediatr. 2019 Nov 13;19(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1717-y.
PMID: 31722685DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shabina Ariff, MBBS, FCPS
Aga Khan University
- STUDY CHAIR
Mark Tessaro, MD, FRCPC
The Hospital for Sick Kids
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Khushboo Qaim, BScN
Aga Khan University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hasan Meerali, MD, FAAP
The Hospital for Sick Kids
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2018
First Posted
May 23, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2018
Primary Completion
October 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
July 5, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share