Impact of Metformin on Peripheral Arterial Calcification in Type 1 Diabetes
IMPACT-1D
2 other identifiers
interventional
230
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Vascular calcification (VC) is a complication frequently observed in elderly, in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and in diabetes (particularly in type 1 diabetes). VC is a dynamic pathophysiological process that causes cardiovascular morbidity and is an independent risk factor of major amputation. In vitro and human observational studies have suggested a role of metformin in preventing VC. The investigators propose to test the effect of metformin treatment during two years on lower limb arterial calcification evaluated by CT-scan in patients with type 1 diabetes and without CKD. This research is a phase III double blind randomized controlled trial consisting of 2 years double-blind treatment phase (patients randomized to metformin or placebo) in type 1 diabetic patients. The participants and the investigators will be blinded to the study medications taken during the double-blind treatment period
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jun 2021
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 12, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 2, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 29, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 29, 2027
November 24, 2025
November 1, 2025
6.3 years
October 5, 2020
November 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change between below-knee arterial calcification score evaluated by CT-scan at T0 and T2years in type 1 diabetic patients treated or not with metformin.
Below-knee artery calcification scores will be obtained after scanning with a 128-slice multidetector CT scanner without contrast, in a craniocaudal direction, from the bottom of the patella down to the ankle region. The 3-mm cross-sectional slices were separately analyzed. Analysis was performed by radiologists kept blind about the results of the color duplex ultrasonography, laboratory tests, and clinical examinations, using a commercially available software package (Heartbeat CaScore; Philips Healthcare). On cross-sectional images, areas of calcification along below-knee arteries with a density ≥130 Hounsfield units attenuation and a surface \>1 mm2 were identified automatically. Calcification score, determined according to the method described by Agatston et al, will be obtained separately for each of the main below-knee arteries (distal popliteal, anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and peroneal arteries) and added up to obtain the calc
Change between T0 baseline visit and T2 years
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change between below-knee arterial ultrasonographic occlusion score at T0 and T2years in type 1 diabetic patients treated or not with metformin.
Change between T0 baseline visit and T2 years
Change between ankle and toe brachial indexes at T0 and T2years in type 1 diabetic patients supplemented or not with metformin.
Change between T0 baseline visit and T2 years
Change between pulse wave velocity at T0 and T2years in type 1 diabetic patients supplemented or not with metformin.
Change between T0 baseline visit and T2 years
Change between coronary calcification score evaluated by CT-scan at T0 and T2years in type 1 diabetic patients treated or not with metformin.
Change between T0 baseline visit and T2 years
Change between below- knee arterial calcification score progression between T0 and T2years with initial below-knee arterial calcification score ≤ and >400 (subgroup analysis)
Change between T0 baseline visit and T2 years
Study Arms (2)
Metformin
EXPERIMENTALMetformin, started at 500 mg per day per os and titrated up to 2000 mg during 2 years (increase of 500 mg every two weeks)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo (coated tablet similar to metformin tablet titrated following the same schedule as in the experimental arm), started at 500 mg per day per os and titrated up to 2000 mg during 2 years (increase of 500 mg every two weeks)
Interventions
Metformin, started at 500 mg per day per os and titrated up to 2000 mg during 2 years (increase of 500 mg every two weeks)
Control group : Placebo (coated tablet similar to metformin tablet titrated following the same schedule as in the experimental arm) started at 500 mg per day per os and titrated up to 2000 mg during 2 years (increase of 500 mg every two weeks)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Type 1 diabetes
- Women and Men ≥ 18 years old and ≤ 80 years old with:
- Complications: diabetic retinopathy and/or nephropathy (with creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/mn) and/or neuropathy and/or peripheral arterial occlusive disease and/or cardiopathy and/or stroke and/or
- cardiovascular risk factors : hypertension and/or dyslipidemia (HDL \< 0.35g/L or LDL \> 1.9g/L or treated dyslipidemia) and/or tobacco use (old or active smoking greater than 5 pack years) and/or
- Diabetes duration \>20 years
- For women in childbearing age, effective contraception during the whole trial
- Signed written informed consent
- Affiliation of a social security regime (AME excluded)
You may not qualify if:
- Known metformin contra-indication: severe liver insufficiency -CHILD B or C, heart failure (FEVG\<45%) or history of pulmonary edema, respiratory insufficiency with history of acute respiratory failure or patients receiving oxygen therapy, chronic ethylism, lactic acidosis
- Know sensitivity to metformin or to any of its excipients or placebo excipients (lactose)
- Indication or history of lower limb angioplasty (with stenting) and/or bypass
- HbA1c of less than 3 months \>11%
- Chronic inflammatory disease or chronic immune-suppressive drugs intake
- Pregnancy woman (confirmed by a sanguine beta-human chorionic gonadotropin test) or breastfeeding woman
- Patient under legal protection measure (tutorship or curatorship) or deprived of freedom
- Unable to consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Diabetology department
Paris, 75013, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Olivier OB Bourron, Doctor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2020
First Posted
October 12, 2020
Study Start
June 2, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 29, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 29, 2027
Last Updated
November 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years following article publication. Requests out of these time frame can also be submitted to the sponsor
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.
Data are available upon reasonable request The procedures carried out with the French data privacy authority (CNIL, National Commission for Information Technology and Freedoms) do not provide for the transmission of the database, nor do the information and consent documents signed by the patients. Consultation by the editorial board or interested researchers of individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article after deidentification may nevertheless be considered, subject to prior determination of the terms and conditions of such consultation and in respect for compliance with the applicable regulations.